Re: [Paddlewise] Chines debate baffles me

From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:22:19 -0800
Kevin wrote:

(SNIP)
> Loophole #2: My arguments are not as solid if the kayak is moving or the
> water is tilted (e.g. waves). When surfing, hard chines certainly
> contribute an added element of stability because they resist broaching
more
> than rounded chines.

John wrote:

>>>>Round bilge boats can do the same thing. Just depends upon design.<<<<<

Okay John, I can think of several ways this might be so and still maintain
round bilges: Lots of V--or a raised keel or rib (skeg--for you NA's) in the
stern quarters, a drop skeg or fixed fin in the stern quarter, a fin keel,
stern quarter bilge keels, stern quarter mounted lee boards, a radically
fish-form/narrow hull combination, lots of rocker in the forebody only, a
stern heavy trim (either through cockpit placement or ballast), and a deep
draft or underslung rudder. Were you thinking of any others I missed? While
what you said is true, I often get frustrated when you make vague statements
like the above without explaining why YOU believe it is so, or giving us any
examples that help make your point. I for one, would like to hear how you
address this issue. For instance, is there anything you have done on one of
your designs, like say the QCC 500, to resist broaching.

Matt Broze
http://www.marinerkayaks.com



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Fri Nov 17 2000 - 04:52:50 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:34 PDT