RE:[Paddlewise] Secondary stability

From: Nick Schade <schade_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:03:51 -0500
Peter,
  I basically agree with you. I chose the inflection point because it 
is relatively easy to find and it would seem to be a point of some 
significance because it is the point on the graph where the slope is 
steepest. Although the horse has probably long since expired, I'll 
continue to pulverize it just to see if there is any merit to be 
found.

If you lean a boat to a given angle and try to hold it there, the 
inflection point is the angle where it will be hardest to get the 
boat to tip any farther. From this point until you reach the maximum 
of the curve, any increase in tipping force will still be balanced by 
a righting force, but you are over the hump. From the inflection 
point on, it will become progressively easier to force the kayak into 
a capsize.

If the top of the curve is the beginning of the end, maybe the 
inflection point is the end of the beginning.

One of the biggest problems I see with the inflection point theory is 
that many boats don't have an inflection point. For these boats the 
steepest part of the curve is at zero degrees of heel. I am not ready 
to say none of those boats have any secondary stability.

At the very least I hope that my pointing to the inflection point put 
a little spot light on the roll played by the slope of the curve.
Nick


At 1:44 AM -0800 11/21/00, Peter A. Chopelas wrote:
>-snip-
>
>I also question Nick's proposed definition of using the location of the
>inflection point as indicative of the perceived secondary stability.  If
>Matt is not thoroughly confused by now the inflection point is where the
>RATE of CHANGE of a curve reverses.  For example a strait line from the
>"zero, zero" point has a constant rate of change, for each degree of roll
>you get the same increase of correcting moment; for a concave curve the
>rate of change is increasing, for each additional angel of roll the
>increase in correcting moment gets larger, for a convex cure the rate of
>INCREASE of correcting monument gets smaller, BUT IT IS STILL INCREASING,
>just not as much.  If the curve has an inflection point it is where the
>RATE of increase reduces below zero so the RATE of change is getting
>smaller, it would be where the concave cure meets the convex curve.
-snip-
-- 


Nick Schade
Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St, Suite I
Glastonbury, CT 06033
(860) 659-8847

Schade_at_guillemot-kayaks.com
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

>>>>"It's not just Art, It's a Craft!"<<<<

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Nov 21 2000 - 14:05:19 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:34 PDT