A few clarifications I think are in order, I never wrote that secondary stability was meaningless, I just speculated that it could be something not relevant to large commercial vessels since you can not rapidly shift the CG to alter the ships response like you would on a kayak. I also question Nick's proposed definition of using the location of the inflection point as indicative of the perceived secondary stability. If Matt is not thoroughly confused by now the inflection point is where the RATE of CHANGE of a curve reverses. For example a strait line from the "zero, zero" point has a constant rate of change, for each degree of roll you get the same increase of correcting moment; for a concave curve the rate of change is increasing, for each additional angel of roll the increase in correcting moment gets larger, for a convex cure the rate of INCREASE of correcting monument gets smaller, BUT IT IS STILL INCREASING, just not as much. If the curve has an inflection point it is where the RATE of increase reduces below zero so the RATE of change is getting smaller, it would be where the concave cure meets the convex curve. If you have a "low" stability hull, where large increases in the roll angle only result in a modest increase in correcting moment, I think most people would say it has low secondary stability, regardless of where the inflection point is. I do not think the infection point is something perceptible in the seat of the pants, because even if it the RATE of CHANGE is decreasing, the CORRECTING moment is still INCREASING as you roll the kayak over on its side. I.E. the more you roll it, the higher the resistance to the roll, it would be where you feel the resistance drop off, when you are over the top of the curve, where you start feeling like you are going over. I would also think that if the curve had a sharp peak, it would feel less forgiving since the correcting moment would drop off rapidly with little warning once you pass a certain roll angle. It seems to me that the secondary stability would be (taking the paddlers skill out of the picture) a combination of what is the absolute resistance to rolling is at a given perceived angle of roll, and how much margin you have from this point to the peak, and how much warning you get before the correcting moment drops off. So if you roll up to say 30 degrees and the slope of the curve is at some given angle, but if you have little margin and a real shape break you would likely perceive this as poor secondary stability. OTOH if you have a kayak with a lower slope at 30 degrees angle of roll, but a large margin (i.e. a lot more angle of roll to the top of the curve) and the curve had a flatter top giving you more warning, you would say it had good secondary stability. In fact I would say the higher the peak of the curve on the chart (i.e. highest absolute rolling resistance) would have more influence over the perceived secondary stability than the location of the inflection point. And the overall rate of increase, or average slope, would also have a powerful influence of the perceived secondary stability. I do not claim to be anykind of an expert on hull design but I have spent many years analyzing aircraft stability and control curves know well how to read a chart and its derivatives, you have to look at how the changes affect the "human factors", hard to predict from purely a mathematical stand point. I would suggest someone get together a group of paddlers of various skill levels and compare perceived secondary stability with all kinds of curve properties in various hull designs. If you can find any kind of correlation (which you may well not find) then we might have a working definition, and something to look for in a cure (maybe an article idea for SK mag?). As one of my engineering professors used to say, one simple experiment is worth a thousand expert opinions. Peter *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Nov 21 2000 - 07:17:40 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:34 PDT