PaddleWise by thread

From: Jeff Rowland <jrowland_at_sprynet.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] AT Xception Paddle
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:52:27 -0500
Am planning to purchase my first kayak paddle and want to spend the


extra money to get good quality and light paddle. Have been 


researching the Internet and wanted to get opions from anyone who has paddled
with a AT Xception paddle(carbon model).


Also would like your comments on other carbon based paddles that


I might consider.


Thanks,






***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Vincent Swendsen <ultrarnr_at_hotmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] AT Xception Paddle
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 06:27:04 EST
Jeff,
    I bought a Werner Camano all carbonfiber paddle a few months ago. VERY 
NICE!!! They are very expensive but the light weight make a big difference 
in reducing arm fatigue on long paddles. My typical paddle is 20 to 30 miles 
on the open ocean. I had used wood paddles before which I loved the looks of 
but I am now a believer in carbonfiber. Also depending on where you are 
paddling and the distance you are going I would highly recommend you carry a 
spare paddle. I have broken two paddles in the last year. Lucky for me I was 
very close to shore but it could have been very ugly if it had happened off 
shore.
    I would recommend you talk to dealers about the AT Xception and find out 
their thoughts as well. Find out if they have ever had them returned because 
of problems and how good is the warranty service.
   Hope this helps, Vinny

No financial interest in Werner.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <HTERVORT_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] AT Xception Paddle
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 21:41:16 EST
In a message dated 11/18/00 5:51:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
jrowland_at_sprynet.com writes:

>  Have been researching the Internet and wanted to get opions from anyone 
who has 
> paddled with a AT Xception paddle(carbon model).

Jeff,

I've only used the AT touring paddle a few times (a 2-day trip and a day 
paddle or two), so I was waiting for those who own the paddle to review it 
for you.  I know there have been members who have crowed warmly about the AT 
on this list in the past.

I found the paddle to be exceptionally well made, light (with very low swing 
weight) and very beautiful.  It has a smooth contour to the blade and shaft 
that are both pleasing to the eye as well as being clean and stable in the 
water.  Since the blade and shaft are made in one piece, there is no 
unsightly, heavy or weakened join between the two.  This also lends to the 
clean lines, making it one of the sleekest of all the top-contender paddles 
I've experienced.

Blades are of small-to-medium area which makes it excellent for long days of 
paddling, *if* you like the feel of a high-cadence paddle.  I would judge it 
as being somewhere between the power of a Little Dipper and Camano.
 
The grip has plenty of indexing and is comfortable in my hand.  It is of a 
somewhat triangular cross-section, which gives it a different feel from the 
round or oval shafts of other paddles -- something which shouldn't take long 
to adjust to.

The crank angle seems about right for me.  The model I used was feathered.  
In spite of the fact that I usually use a straight, traditional paddle for 
touring, I found it easy to use the paddle with low-hand control.  I found it 
liked to be held at a rather higher angle to the horizontal than I use with 
the Greenland stick, but I felt a cleaner entry and more power at the steeper 
angle.

Downsides?
$$$$$$$
The push-button take-apart had only one hole (feathered).  I would have 
preferred using the paddle at 0 feather and would order the paddle with the 
second hole to allow switching.
The distance between the blades and the crank are fixed, regardless of the 
paddle length.  I found the cranks a bit far apart for my style of paddling 
on the 230 cm paddle I used.  I think the 220 cm would be just right for me 
(which is OK since I prefer the shorter paddle}.  But the point is to make 
sure you try the paddle in the length you intend to buy to verify that the 
spacing matches your build and style.

>  
>  Also would like your comments on other carbon based paddles that  I might 
consider.

CD Crank (I don't know the model name)--

If you are specifically looking for a crank paddle, also look at the one 
offered by Current Designs.  Not as clean in construction, more traditional 
in that the blade and shaft are made separately and joined together, but 
paddles just as sweetly and has a few advantages over the AT:

A bit cheaper in graphite.
The distance between the blade and crank can be varied by the manufacturer 
irrespective of the paddle length.  I don't know whether they maintain the 
crank-to-crank distance, but the 230-cm paddle I tried had just the right 
spacing for me.
The grip area is a large oval which is the most comfortable grip I have ever 
experienced on a paddle.  Gave me superior index awareness and grip security 
without placing stress on my hand or wrist. 

Werner--

Can't beat the quality.  Unfortunately, they don't have a crank model and 
they discontinued my favorite shape -- the "skinny dipper" long version of 
the Little Dipper.  Beautiful, light and very light in glass and carbon.  The 
one you see on the water.  Can't go wrong with the classics.

Swift--

Swift makes some moderately priced paddles which are very nice.  Not as beefy 
as the Werners, not as nicely made as the AT or Werners.  No crank.


If possible, get out and try as many paddles as you can.  Compare different 
sizes (length and blade area) in one model until you get a good idea of the 
size paddle you want, then demo different models in like sizes.

Good luck and happy paddling,

Harold

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:19 PDT