PaddleWise by thread

From: Michael Edelman <mje_at_spamcop.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 07:59:31 -0400
Pipeguy55_at_aol.com says:

> I'm also new to this style of paddle, but not new to kayaking and I agree
> with all of your points in the post.  My question to you or others is this:
> Do you still use your original paddle or has the "traditional" paddle become
> the exclusive paddle of choice.
>
I pretty much use the high-aspect ratio paddles exclusively-. Currently
that's a Werner Arctic Wind (sort of a pseudo-Greenland paddle) and a
Feathercraft Klatwa.

The one exception is in my double, where I use a pair of Bending
Branches Journey paddles when paddling with a partner, because of the
width of the kayak. If I take the double (a Klepper Aerius II) out as a
single, which is rare, I also use a long Euro-style paddle. Of course,
even my Euro-style paddles are pretty high aspect ratio. My very first
kayak paddle was an original Werner Little Dipper.

>   The reason I'm asking is that it seems to me
> that on high wind or rough water conditions, and on long trips the Greenland
> paddle would be a better choice.  On light wind and short trips, or if I feel
> like "getting aerobic" for a half-hour the Werner Camano is my weapon of
> choice.  I have heard it advised to find a paddle you like and stick with it,
> but so far I don't have a problem switching between the two styles.
>
If it works, why not? The main object is, after all, to have fun!

-- mike
 -------------------------
 Michael Edelman
 mje_at_spamcop.net
 http://www.foldingkayaks.org
 http://www.findascope.com


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Pipeguy55_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 22:43:56 EDT
In a message dated 5/19/01 2:25:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, mje_at_spamcop.net 
writes:


> ,  I'm still a newcomer to this style of paddle, but my
> experience suggests a few possible hypotheses:
> 
> < 4 snips >

Hello Michael,  

I'm also new to this style of paddle, but not new to kayaking and I agree 
with all of your points in the post.  My question to you or others is this:  
Do you still use your original paddle or has the "traditional" paddle become 
the exclusive paddle of choice.  The reason I'm asking is that it seems to me 
that on high wind or rough water conditions, and on long trips the Greenland 
paddle would be a better choice.  On light wind and short trips, or if I feel 
like "getting aerobic" for a half-hour the Werner Camano is my weapon of 
choice.  I have heard it advised to find a paddle you like and stick with it, 
but so far I don't have a problem switching between the two styles.  Feel 
free to get technical, I can handle it!

Thanks,
Steve Schmitz


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dennis, Becky & Natalie <arebecca1_at_qwest.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 13:26:39 -0500
Pipeguy55_at_aol.com wrote:

>  < My question to you or others is this:
> Do you still use your original paddle or has the "traditional" paddle become
> the exclusive paddle of choice. >

If I can horn in on this dialogue:  I switched to a (3 1/2" wide blade, 86" long,
24"loom) white spruce Greenland paddle (produced by Peter Pestalozzi of Odyysey
Designs in Duluth) about a year ago.  Every so often I'll try a Euro paddle again
(I own several - a Mid-Swift, a CD Medusa, etc) to see if I'm missing something;
I'm not.  The Greenland paddle and my 72" storm paddle are all I use now.

> <The reason I'm asking is that it seems to me
> that on high wind or rough water conditions, and on long trips the Greenland
> paddle would be a better choice.  On light wind and short trips, or if I feel
> like "getting aerobic" for a half-hour the Werner Camano is my weapon of
> choice.

Today, on a local chain of lakes, I ran into one of the fittest and most skillful
paddlers in the area.  He regularly paddles in any kind of water in Lake Superior
and can do 40 mile days at a fast pace (4 to 4.5 knots pace).  He is younger and
far fitter than I, so I joined him today and cruised for a bit at his quick tempo
(he uses Lendals) with no difficulty.  Then I asked him if we could sprint for a
bit to see how far behind I might be left with my jGreenland blades.  It didn't
happen, I stayed with him to very near hull speed and did not drop behind.  Given
our relative fitness levels, the only (subjective) conclusion I can come to is
that my Greenland paddle IS as efficient as his Euro paddle.  Oh, by the way , we
both paddle Nordkapp Jubilees and are about the same size.

Dennis - St. Paul

> >***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
> here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
> responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
> Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
> Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
> Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
> ***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <schade_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:06:43 -0400
At 1:26 PM -0500 5/20/01, Dennis, Becky & Natalie wrote:
>
>Today, on a local chain of lakes, I ran into one of the fittest and 
>most skillful
>paddlers in the area.  He regularly paddles in any kind of water in 
>Lake Superior
>and can do 40 mile days at a fast pace (4 to 4.5 knots pace).  He is 
>younger and
>far fitter than I, so I joined him today and cruised for a bit at 
>his quick tempo
>(he uses Lendals) with no difficulty.  Then I asked him if we could 
>sprint for a
>bit to see how far behind I might be left with my jGreenland blades. 
>It didn't
>happen, I stayed with him to very near hull speed and did not drop 
>behind.  Given
>our relative fitness levels, the only (subjective) conclusion I can come to is
>that my Greenland paddle IS as efficient as his Euro paddle.  Oh, by 
>the way , we
>both paddle Nordkapp Jubilees and are about the same size.
>

This means that you are able to apply about as much propulsion force 
with your paddle as he did to his. It does not say anything about 
which is more efficient. And if you were near hull speed, then one of 
you may have been applying more force, but the boat just couldn't 
really go any faster.

This is what makes the discussion so confusing. Anybody can do a test 
like yours and it would seem that you have answered the paddle 
efficiency question. But unless you do some test which measure how 
much energy each of you expended to create the force to make you go 
that fast, you still don't know anything about the efficiency.
-- 
Nick Schade
Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
(860) 659-8847
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <KiAyker_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 09:48:53 EDT
   Ya know, there are a lot of different styles of boats available today each 
designed with it's own purpose and characteristics. A K-1 would be pretty 
lousy for surfing. A surf kayak would be pretty lousy for touring. Even among 
the "touring" kayaks there are any number of different designs and styles 
available to fit the individuals needs and desires. Is there one single kayak 
design out there that surpasses all the others for efficiency? I sincerely 
doubt it. especially since each one of us probably has our own definition of 
what efficiency in a kayak is.
  When you get right down to it, a kayak is not the "most efficient" choice 
for doing much of anything. I could carry a lot more gear more easily in a 
power boat. I could go a whole lot faster as well. But that's not really the 
point of this sport is it? As several other people have pointed out, we're 
here to have fun. And I'll bet each one of us has his or her own definition 
of what fun is as well. If my idea of fun is paddling my own homebuilt skin 
on frame boat and propelling it with a hand carved Inuit style paddle, so be 
it. If I want the fastest kevlar touring boat available which I can push 
really fast with a carbon fiber wing paddle, well that's fine too. Neither 
one is right or wrong. They're just different styles.
  And so it is in kayak paddles as well. I have no doubt that some paddle 
designs are superior to others in performing certain tasks. If all you are 
interested in is pushing your boat as fast as possible over a short course, 
then we can probably narrow the field as to what paddles would be the best 
suited to your needs. The same thing applies to long distance touring, or 
surfing or rolling or what have you. But if you are looking for one paddle 
that can do it all, then I think you are simply going to have to settle on 
some compromise. Just what and where that compromise is will be up to the 
individual.
  I enjoy experimenting with different kinds of equipment. And while much of 
these techie discussions about paddle and boat designs are a bit over my 
head, I still try to wade through them and understand what I can. I think 
it's fascinating, and I am in awe of the people who do seem to have a solid 
grasp of this stuff. I do hope you folks keep it coming. I figure the more I 
read about it, the better the chance that some of it will sink in. And while 
I think we really should try to be civil in our discussions, I particularly 
enjoy the debates from opposing sides. I think hearing both sides of any 
argument is really the best way to try to figure out just where the truth 
lies.
  Anyways, just my two cents.

Scott
So.Cal.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Wes Boyd <boydwe_at_dmci.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 20:41:48
At 09:48 AM 5/20/01 EDT, KiAyker_at_aol.com wrote:

>  I enjoy experimenting with different kinds of equipment. And while much of 
>these techie discussions about paddle and boat designs are a bit over my 
>head, I still try to wade through them and understand what I can. I think 
>it's fascinating, and I am in awe of the people who do seem to have a solid 
>grasp of this stuff. I do hope you folks keep it coming. I figure the more I 
>read about it, the better the chance that some of it will sink in. And while 

>  Anyways, just my two cents.

It's been a while since we've had a good technical knock down, drag out on
P-wise, and I think a few people have forgotten what it's like to have
people like Matt, Nick and John throwing equations at each other. (BTW,
welcome back, John -- we've missed you!) But, I had an interesting time
today trying several paddles, and think I learned something useful.

It was a beautiful spring day today -- a light breeze, warm, but not
exceptionally so -- I figured that it wouldn't be particularly good for
observing the coefficient of exposure demonstrated by various bikinis along
the way, but was proved wrong. Two regular paddle partners and I had
decided to do an easy paddle, just to enjoy the day.

Problem: my regular paddle is momentarily deadlined, waiting for varnish to
dry after I sanded out a few scratches. Just to have something to use, I
grabbed a paddle I had laying around. This is an aluminum shaft job, big
plastic blades, and rather heavy, but cheap -- I think I paid $44 for it,
just to have something around when I needed a spare paddle. But, inspired
by the discussion on Paddlewise the past few days, I asked a buddy to bring
along his Superior Inuit paddle. I've played with it a couple times, but
never for any distance. Well, we took our time, and I was continually
struggling to keep up with it, churning out a stroke rate perhaps twice the
normal rate. It took us over an hour to go about three miles, although I
will admit that we stopped for a while to look at some guys playing with
some loud, fast RC model boats. I'd hate to take one of those in the side
of the hull when it was going full bore, but so would the owner -- we
discovered that they cost about three grand each! 

But, I digress. My arms were getting pretty tired from the high stroke
rate, partly due to the weight that has to get moved around (arms plus
paddle), and partly due to the fact that I didn't feel that the blades had
bite enough to keep the boat on course in a gusty crosswind -- to the point
where I put the rudder down for the first time this year. I was rather glad
to get up to the break point, where I put the Inuit paddle under the deck
lines, and dug out the aluminum and plastic cheapie I'd brought along just
in case. We made the trip back in considerably less time, in spite of the
heavier feel of the cheapie, its better bite of the water meant that my
stroke rate was something I was more comfortable with, in spite of the
feeling that I was putting more effort into each stroke. 

We stopped again, sat on the shore, drank cool drinks, and watched boats
and pontoons go up and down the narrow channel, most loaded with people, a
few of them wearing colorful high exposure coefficent immersion gear. After
a while, we got going again. 

My buddy decided he wanted to paddle with the Inuit paddle for a while, so
I put the aluminum cheapie back under the deck lines, and took his regular
paddle, which is a carbon-fiber Epic that weighs only 17 or 19 ounces --
You barely feel like there's anything there, and although it's supposed to
be stronger than dirt, I didn't feel like putting any stress on it. While
it's not supposed to break, it would be painful to replace. Worse, it's a
one-piece, with a fixed right control, and I'm the only person I know that
paddle left control (carpial tunnel is involved). I was probably slower
with this paddle than with the others, only because I had to stop and think
about what I was doing. So long as I could remember to keep my right wrist
moving, it was fine, but if I stopped thinking about it, sooner or later
I'd control the wrong hand, and Whoops! Unfortunately, for some of the
distance we followed a pontoon loaded with high school girls wearing, well,
you guessed it, and keeping my mind on my paddling was difficult.

At the turnaround point, I switched back to the cheapie, which now really
felt like lead, but at least which I could control. On the way back, I
reflected that much of paddle selection is involved in a personal decision,
and in what you are used to and comfortable with. No doubt, I could get a
little more comfortable with either of the odd paddles, given time, and the
Inuit paddle has some distinct advantages in things like recoveries. But,
for the time being, I think I'm going to send this off and get another coat
of varnish on my regular paddle.

-- Wes
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wes Boyd's Kayak Place               http://www2.dmci.net/wesboyd/kayak.htm
Kayaks for Big Guys (And Gals) | Trip Reports | Places To Go | Boats & Gear
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <schade_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:59:03 -0400
At 9:48 AM -0400 5/20/01, KiAyker_at_aol.com wrote:
>    Ya know, there are a lot of different styles of boats available today each
>designed with it's own purpose and characteristics. A K-1 would be pretty
>lousy for surfing. A surf kayak would be pretty lousy for touring. Even among
>the "touring" kayaks there are any number of different designs and styles
>available to fit the individuals needs and desires. Is there one single kayak
>design out there that surpasses all the others for efficiency? I sincerely
>doubt it. especially since each one of us probably has our own definition of
>what efficiency in a kayak is.

<snip>


While I don't agree that the definition of "efficiency" changes, I do 
think that different kinds of paddling or paddlers will require 
different techniques and different paddles to perform at the most 
efficient level. Efficiency is just the ability to go farther/faster 
with the same effort, or going the same distance/speed with less 
effort. Given a choice, everyone would prefer the most efficient. And 
the right paddle is one aspect of this ability. The best paddle for 
each person and their paddling goals will be different. But since all 
paddles work by making water move, the same principles will apply to 
all paddles regardless of the generic type.

Nick
-- 
Nick Schade
Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
(860) 659-8847
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <volinjo_at_juno.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Advantages of the high aspect ratio paddle?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 21:17:15 -0400
I switch around among my two greenland paddles (different lenghths and
different weights) and my two euro paddles (Werner's San Juan & Camano). 
I like to try all of them, and sometimes one feels right and sometimes
another.  Also, I paddle with a BCU affiliated company, and all of the
instruction and assessment is with euro paddles.  I have some rotator
cuff problems, and when my shoulders bother me, the greenland paddle is
definitely better for me.  Also, the greenland paddle makes bracing and
rolling so easy that I feel like I'm cheating if I don't try to do it
with the euro paddle too.

Joan
  My question to you or others 
> is this:  
> Do you still use your original paddle or has the "traditional" 
> paddle become 
> the exclusive paddle of choice.  The reason I'm asking is that it 
> seems to me 
> that on high wind or rough water conditions, and on long trips the 
> Greenland 
> paddle would be a better choice.  On light wind and short trips, or 
> if I feel 
> like "getting aerobic" for a half-hour the Werner Camano is my 
> weapon of 
> choice.  I have heard it advised to find a paddle you like and stick 
> with it, 
> but so far I don't have a problem switching between the two styles.  
> Feel 
> free to get technical, I can handle it!
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Schmitz
> 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:22 PDT