PaddleWise by thread

From: Mel Lammers <mslammers_at_earthlink.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Paddle Bouyancy
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 18:54:34 -0400
I would question the amount of buoyant force from a high-aspect (I hope this
is the Greenland version which is what I am talking about) paddle.  While I
am sure that if wood, it would be more buoyant than a unfilled carbon fiber
or fiberglass, I would think the force would be small.  Wood, after all, is
normally of a density in the range of .35 - .6  which might be met or exceed
by foam filling in the shaft and possibly in the blade.  In any case, the
force would be small since the volume in the water is small in either case.
At least it seems that way to me. Does anyone have any data in terms of
force for specific paddles instead of theoretical assumptions?

As I get older, I desire any change which makes my paddling more efficient
in terms of HP in --HP out with the 2 numbers being closer in value. So my
questions are:

If I change from my carbon fiber Werner Camano (230 CM) to a 230 CM
Greenland wooden paddle, would I feel less tired at the end of an hour, 2
hours, 3 hours, etc.?
What additional specifications should I seek?
Can I get a 4 piece version for transportability on airplanes?
Does anyone have data to support answers to the above, other than anecdotal?
(not that this is bad, just the engineer in me coming to the fore)


--Mel--
=^..^=
http://home.earthlink.net/~mslammers
mslammers_at_earthlink.net
mellammers_at_mellammers.net
bagboater_at_yahoogroups.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bagboater
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DFWseayakers
http://www.mellammers.net
http://www.geocities.com/mslammers

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Albert Wang <albertwang1_at_home.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Paddle Bouyancy
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:52:52 -0700
Maybe I don't understand...

How does filling a paddle with foam or having the paddle be made out of wood
make it more bouyant?

Foam can decrease the need for higher density structural materials. But just
filling air with foam or wood makes it less bouyant not more.

Greenlanders typically have a higher volume, hence more buoyancy. If you
made one out of carbon and left it hollow, it would be more bouyant than the
same paddle in wood.

live long and paddle,

albert



> I would question the amount of buoyant force from a high-aspect (I hope
this
> is the Greenland version which is what I am talking about) paddle.  While
I
> am sure that if wood, it would be more buoyant than a unfilled carbon
fiber
> or fiberglass, I would think the force would be small.  Wood, after all,
is
> normally of a density in the range of .35 - .6  which might be met or
exceed
> by foam filling in the shaft and possibly in the blade.  In any case, the
> force would be small since the volume in the water is small in either
case.
> At least it seems that way to me. Does anyone have any data in terms of
> force for specific paddles instead of theoretical assumptions?
>
> As I get older, I desire any change which makes my paddling more efficient
> in terms of HP in --HP out with the 2 numbers being closer in value. So my
> questions are:
>
> If I change from my carbon fiber Werner Camano (230 CM) to a 230 CM
> Greenland wooden paddle, would I feel less tired at the end of an hour, 2
> hours, 3 hours, etc.?
> What additional specifications should I seek?
> Can I get a 4 piece version for transportability on airplanes?
> Does anyone have data to support answers to the above, other than
anecdotal?
> (not that this is bad, just the engineer in me coming to the fore)
>
>
> --Mel--
> =^..^=
> http://home.earthlink.net/~mslammers
> mslammers_at_earthlink.net
> mellammers_at_mellammers.net
> bagboater_at_yahoogroups.com
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bagboater
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DFWseayakers
> http://www.mellammers.net
> http://www.geocities.com/mslammers
>
>
***************************************************************************
> PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
> here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
> responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
> Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
> Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
> Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
>
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mel Lammers <mslammers_at_earthlink.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Paddle Bouyancy
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 21:03:17 -0400
First, let me say that I am not an expert in this area.  That said, the
filling of a low-aspect paddle would increase stiffness and therefore reduce
the need for the amount of shell material.  That should reduce the total
density.  In the case of the shaft, it prevents water from filling the
cavity.  I hadn't thought about the volume of the wooden paddle.

In any case, we are talking about a small amount of bouyant force it seems
to me.  Maybe since it is at the end of a relatively long shaft, the force
doesn't need to be large.
--Mel--
=^..^=
http://home.earthlink.net/~mslammers
mslammers_at_earthlink.net
mellammers_at_mellammers.net
bagboater_at_yahoogroups.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bagboater
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DFWseayakers
http://www.mellammers.net
http://www.geocities.com/mslammers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert Wang" <albertwang1_at_home.com>
To: "Mel Lammers" <mslammers_at_earthlink.net>; <Paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 7:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Paddle Bouyancy


> Maybe I don't understand...
>
> How does filling a paddle with foam or having the paddle be made out of
wood
> make it more bouyant?
>
> Foam can decrease the need for higher density structural materials. But
just
> filling air with foam or wood makes it less bouyant not more.
>
> Greenlanders typically have a higher volume, hence more buoyancy. If you
> made one out of carbon and left it hollow, it would be more bouyant than
the
> same paddle in wood.
>
> live long and paddle,
>
> albert
>
>
>
> > I would question the amount of buoyant force from a high-aspect (I hope
> this
> > is the Greenland version which is what I am talking about) paddle.
While
> I
> > am sure that if wood, it would be more buoyant than a unfilled carbon
> fiber
> > or fiberglass, I would think the force would be small.  Wood, after all,
> is
> > normally of a density in the range of .35 - .6  which might be met or
> exceed
> > by foam filling in the shaft and possibly in the blade.  In any case,
the
> > force would be small since the volume in the water is small in either
> case.
> > At least it seems that way to me. Does anyone have any data in terms of
> > force for specific paddles instead of theoretical assumptions?
> >
> > As I get older, I desire any change which makes my paddling more
efficient
> > in terms of HP in --HP out with the 2 numbers being closer in value. So
my
> > questions are:
> >
> > If I change from my carbon fiber Werner Camano (230 CM) to a 230 CM
> > Greenland wooden paddle, would I feel less tired at the end of an hour,
2
> > hours, 3 hours, etc.?
> > What additional specifications should I seek?
> > Can I get a 4 piece version for transportability on airplanes?
> > Does anyone have data to support answers to the above, other than
> anecdotal?
> > (not that this is bad, just the engineer in me coming to the fore)
> >
> >
> > --Mel--
> > =^..^=
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~mslammers
> > mslammers_at_earthlink.net
> > mellammers_at_mellammers.net
> > bagboater_at_yahoogroups.com
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Bagboater
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DFWseayakers
> > http://www.mellammers.net
> > http://www.geocities.com/mslammers
> >
> >
>
***************************************************************************
> > PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
> > here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
> > responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the
author.
> > Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
> > Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
> > Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
> >
>
***************************************************************************
>
>

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:22 PDT