Nick Schade wrote: > > At 9:36 AM -0500 1/17/02, John Winters wrote: > >However, Dr. Savitsky pointed out that > >the rise in CG during surfing could occur but you could not call it planing > >any more than you could say a person falling off a building was flying > >because he generated some lift. The distinction between planing and not > >planing is the vertical rise caused by the boat's power not an outside > >source. > > OK, I guess there is a definition out there that precludes using the > word "planing" when the boat is "surfing". Can you use "planing" to > describe what is happening with a water ski? How about if you put a > model of a planing boat in a tow tank? Is the data collected > meaningless because the power comes from an outside source? How about > one pontoon of a catamaran where it is the other pontoon that has the > motor. The source of the power strikes me as a funny way of > discriminating how a hull moves through the water. > I've never seen a definition of planing that specified where the propulsion came from. Whether it's from a following wind in a sailboat, a following wave in a surfing kayak, a towline pulling a skiff, or a propellor pushing a motorboat, I'd consider them all to be planing if their hulls rose in the water due to their movement. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Jan 17 2002 - 12:40:46 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:49 PDT