Had a pleasant paddle this afternoon, down the backwater of a small dam. Nice, easy mid-January inland paddle with a couple of friends -- a nice thing to do in a time of year that most years sees all too much ice, snow, and time spent on the computer rather than out in the big world. After the paddle was over, we were sitting on the back of his boathouse, taking in the sun and relaxing muscles too long gone unused, and one of us mentioned a guy that he'd seen or read somewhere that had used a Smoker canoe as the body of a Bonneville salt flats racer -- powered, I presume, by a honking V-8. Though there are days when I'd like to have had a little power in a canoe, this seemed a little much. I got to wondering, however, of the aerodynamics of canoes and kayaks at high speed, however. It's not such a dumb thing -- most of us have had our kayaks out in relative windspeeds of 100 mph or more, say, strapped to the rooftop rack, heading 70 mph down the highway into a 30 knot wind. Those reading from Germany, with no speed limit autobahns, may have had considerably higher relative windspeeds. Now, I will admit to having spent a few bad-weather Sunday afternoons sleeping through NASCAR races on the idiot eye. On the occasions that I have been awake for at least part of the race I've noticed that the announcers spend a lot of time talking about downforce, spoilers, drag, and other things aerodynamic. I suspect that the average kayak designer rarely spends much time thinking about spoilers on a kayak, but as I drove home I spent a little time visualizing what happens to a kayak sitting on the roof of a car at speed. My question, then, is fairly simple: to throw out variables, for the sake of disucssion, let's consider a car with a single kayak heading down a road, with dead calm winds. Ignoring the straps and such that hold it down, is the kayak generating upforce or downforce? My guess is downforce, and probably not an insubstantial amount, mostly because the area between the bottom of the boat and the roof of the car is going to present something of a venturi that Bernoulli's principal can grab hold of. But, there are complications, the biggest one being the wind being deflected upward from the windshield and hood of the car onto the underside of the forepart of the boat hanging out in the breeze. The boat is going to be affected by this, of course; under some circumstances, the upforce will raise the bow of the boat, increasing the frontal area and hence the drag, and the situation will worsen and the boat will do a backflip before you can say, "Did you remember the tiedown straps?" Let's remove some complications and reduce it to simplicity. Mount that boat on a rack on the back of a semi-trailer for the test, just to get rid of the upward force and try to get the airflow coming at it from directly in front. Make a special rack for the test, say, a pair of rods that would fit through fore and aft grab loops on the end of the boat, so the boat can move up or down as necessary without moving backward, and put some scales under the boat. Upforce or downforce? Little or lots? Why do you think so? I know this is a nearly useless question, but it's something to think about while facing the prospect that the weather is supposed to turn colder and it may be a while before I can get out again. -- Wes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Boyd's Kayak Place http://www2.dmci.net/wesboyd/kayak.htm Kayaks for Big Guys (And Gals) | Trip Reports | Places To Go | Boats & Gear --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Jan 27 2002 - 15:43:28 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:50 PDT