PaddleWise by thread

From: Allan McLane <amcl_at_sover.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Shark story stats
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:25:34 -0500
I thought th group would like to see this article http://www.stats.org/newsletters/0201/shark.htm and a little longer followup http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/techwrapper.jsp?PID=1051-250&CID=1051-022502A

Fine examples of herd-mentality at work...

--allan
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig MacKinnon <elroca_at_earthlink.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Shark story stats
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:58:47 -0500
Here's another angle:

http://slate.msn.com/?id=114958

Here's an example of one story that appeared last year:

http://slate.msn.com/?id=112116

and more information on the Bull Shark:

http://www.seatrek.org/curriculum/reference/species/bull.htm

Craig


----- Original Message -----
From: "Allan McLane" <amcl_at_sover.net>
To: "PaddleWise" <PaddleWise_at_paddlewise.net>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 12:25 PM
Subject: [Paddlewise] Shark story stats


> I thought th group would like to see this article
http://www.stats.org/newsletters/0201/shark.htm and a little longer followup
http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/techwrapper.jsp?PID=1051-250&CID=1051
-022502A
>
> Fine examples of herd-mentality at work...
snip
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Fenton <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Shark story stats
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 17:00:40 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Craig MacKinnon" <elroca_at_earthlink.net>
> 
> Here's another angle:
> 
> http://slate.msn.com/?id=114958


Hardly an article (or author) I'd reference if I wanted the facts on
this subject.  There are over 300 species of sharks.  Only a very small 
number of shark species have been known to attack humans.  Marine
researchers and scientists make the point that the vast majority are 
harmless ("gentle" and "trusted" are Saletan's words and, in his effort
to poke fun at scientists and researchers as well as conservationists, 
he deliberately omits the distinction between the species... informing
the reader of the real facts is not his goal).

Saletan is engaging in the same game of promoting supporting statistics
of which he accuses the "apologists" by claiming 2001 figures are as 
high as 2000 when he's caught short... there turns out to be fewer 
attacks reported in 2001 than 2000... a *full* *eleven* percent! 8-O  
(before anyone thinks the numbers are significant, that's 85 reported
attacks for 2000 and 76 for 2001... but it's *still* eleven percent! :-)  
But Saletan wrote his article on shark attacks in September (during 
the big media feeding frenzy on shark attacks), when the number of 
attacks usually decline and before he could know there would indeed 
be fewer attacks for 2001.  George Burgess referenced the 2001 decline 
in attacks to punctuate the point that it is difficult if not impossible 
for scientists to get real meaning from those figures because... attacks
are so rare.  Burgess refused to acknowledge the lower figures had any 
significance or meaning in shark attacks.

I'm not sure what your point is.  Are you afraid you are going to be
attacked by a shark while out in your kayak, especially a bull shark
(i.e. the URLs you submitted on bull sharks which are believed by
researchers to be the most dangerous)?  My point (and I believe Alan's 
point) was that the sensationalism of shark attacks last summer was 
just that.  I know some folks find rationalism to be pretty boring,
but I find knowing the facts refreshing. And the fact is... there are 
a lot more concerns for kayakers (or the vast majority of the human 
population) than shark attack.  Simply put, it didn't deserve the media
hype and stopped getting coverage when September 11 happened (at least
in this country).  Note, there were 24 more shark attacks reported after
Saletan's Sept 7 article (another 46 percent!) but we just didn't read 
much about them because the media had bigger fish to fry.

I find it unfortunate but accurate when Iain Murray at STATS says 
"Every year there is a struggle between science and journalism that 
science normally loses."

But I do think there is hope.


Jackie

  
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramer_at_coe.uga.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Shark story stats
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:35:07 -0500
Jackie Fenton wrote:
> 
> Marine
> researchers and scientists make the point that the vast majority are
> harmless ("gentle" and "trusted" are Saletan's words and, in his effort
> to poke fun at scientists and researchers as well as conservationists,
> he deliberately omits the distinction between the species... informing
> the reader of the real facts is not his goal).

This article reminded me of the line from Bill Bryson's book _A Walk in
the Woods_ about the Appalachian Trail, which I quote from memory:

"We know from statistics that the chances of being eaten by a bear are
very low, but--and this is the absolutely crucial part--if it's you
that's eaten, once is enough"

I'm much more worried about jetskis, hypothermia, and poisonous jellies
than I am about sharks, but if one bites me I'll bet it will ruin my
whole day. Won't for an instant keep me off the water, of course, and
I'll consider a shark sighting a rare priviledge.

-- 
Steve
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:28 PDT