I second the call for more research on clothing effectiveness in cold water immersion tests. As I see it right now the data may only be relevant for the mythical Joe and Jill average. (Joe and Jill work for the auto giants designing seats that perfectly fit them and no one else.) I'm thinking a 110 pound woman in a wet suit would not do as well as a 200 pound man similarly attired. I think that, but I don't know it. All of the variables added up means one hard to control and expensive test project. You'd need at least 10 volunteers, five men and five women, to represent the various sizes and shapes of paddlers. To this add 10 dry suits, 10 wet suits, plus the various combinations of insulating clothing - all of which would have to be the same make. The test would have to be conducted in a pool so you could control the water and air temperature. This means an extended period of time. It'll take a while to rise and lower the temperatures. Is anyone of us a research scientist with access to lots of money. Maybe we should start lobbying for grant and support monies from government, industry and who ever to get this done. Or we could simply accept the information that Mark and Shawn have put forward, recognize the short comings and move on. Gordin Warner *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Apr 04 2002 - 10:53:39 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:51 PDT