PaddleWise by thread

From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] VCP Lid's, Sp*ns*ns, Commercialism, Etc.
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:11:04 -0700
It is my understanding that Paddlewise was founded to get away from the
commercialism (Timmy's Sp*ns*ns) that was clogging up Wave-length's bulletin
board. I vote we try to keep Paddlewise non-commercial. Since I never saw
John's first post, I suspect John contacted Steve back channel to suggest he
back off a bit and respond only to the person requesting the product (as I
had considered doing myself). It looks like Steve inadvertently responded to
the whole list instead of just responding back to John (as I have
inadvertently done before--being on the digest you just can't hit "reply").
If we open Paddlewise up to commercial interests, a whole lot more of us in
kayaking businesses are going to join with the main purpose of advertising
their gear or services to us (a mass audience). I think it is better to let
any commercial interests (or others-shills or not) respond directly to the
person requesting information about a product they sell directly rather than
to everyone on the list. Mariner Kayaks (who BTW also sells VCP replacement
covers:-) and every other store that feels free to post their whole list of
products to the entire list will soon destroy Paddlewise. I, for one, am not
going to wade through a lot of advertising to glean the gems on Paddlewise
and I'm only on the digest (I have enough Spam to delete already).
Commercial interests have to walk a fine line here since anything we say is
going to come from our point of view and that is probably the same point of
view as our business or design philosophy. I have no problem with anyone,
including commercial interests, contacting someone back channel that has
asked for help that a commercial interest can provide. Whether that
suggestion is from the owner of the business or just from someone offering
advice on a business to contact that the person who asked for help might
find valuable would not matter to me.
Is there any way to poll the membership concerning their desires on where to
draw the line with regard to commercial interests?

Matt Broze
www.marinerkayaks.com

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] VCP Lid's, Sp*ns*ns, Commercialism, Etc.
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:00:59 -0400
At 08:11 PM 5/14/02 -0700, Matt Broze wrote:
>It is my understanding that Paddlewise was founded to get away from the
>commercialism (Timmy's Sp*ns*ns) that was clogging up Wave-length's bulletin
>board. I vote we try to keep Paddlewise non-commercial. Since I never saw
>John's first post, I suspect John contacted Steve back channel to suggest he
>back off a bit and respond only to the person requesting the product (as I
>had considered doing myself). It looks like Steve inadvertently responded to
>the whole list instead of just responding back to John (as I have
>inadvertently done before--being on the digest you just can't hit "reply").

It seems that several people didn't see my first post so I should 
clarify/summarize my involvement in the thread.

I saw what I felt was an inappropriate use of the list when Steve responded 
on the list to a request regarding VCP hatch covers.  I responded to the 
list (perhaps I should have done that backchannel) expressing my 
concern.  I had to go back and look at my "outbox" to confirm that both 
Steve and Paddlewise were on the distribution list.  I wouldn't have 
responded at all, had this been an isolated case, but Steve had posted a 
similar response regarding a sprayskirt for a particular kayak.  In both 
cases, I felt that it would have been more appropriate to respond 
backchannel so I responded.  Steve followed up, on the list as well, and 
based on his response I felt that my initial complaint was justified.

>If we open Paddlewise up to commercial interests, a whole lot more of us in
>kayaking businesses are going to join with the main purpose of advertising
>their gear or services to us (a mass audience).

That's the gist of my complaint.  There are not too many places on the 
Internet that are commercial free anymore and private mailing lists seem to 
one of the few remaining places where at least violations of policy are 
someone enforceable.  I will admit that I am a bit sensitive about 
commercial advertising as I am an old school usenet user and remember the 
days when even including a business phone number in a signature file on a 
usenet posting was considered taboo.

>I think it is better to let
>any commercial interests (or others-shills or not) respond directly to the
>person requesting information about a product they sell directly rather than
>to everyone on the list.


Agreed.


>Commercial interests have to walk a fine line here since anything we say is
>going to come from our point of view and that is probably the same point of
>view as our business or design philosophy.

Again, I agree.  If anything, I believe that those with a commercial 
interest here should bend over backwards to avoid crossing that line rather 
than seeing how far they can go over the line before someone calls them on it.


>I have no problem with anyone,
>including commercial interests, contacting someone back channel that has
>asked for help that a commercial interest can provide. Whether that
>suggestion is from the owner of the business or just from someone offering
>advice on a business to contact that the person who asked for help might
>find valuable would not matter to me.

Neither would I.  As I wrote earlier, though, the difference between 
someone offering information about products or services at a business, and 
the business itself promoting itself, is that only the business owner 
retains any profits if any of us choose to use that business.

>Is there any way to poll the membership concerning their desires on where to
>draw the line with regard to commercial interests?

There are a few sites out there that offer free web polling services (e.g 
ballotbox.com).  A polling form could be added to the paddlewise.net site 
easily enough.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:29 PDT