I have both Roads & Rec. (R&R) and MetroGuide (MG) and prefer MG for NavAid and shoreline information. It also includes tide prediction data in many places, but I believe your 76 already has that data. Usually I find MG to have more detail (for ex. it shows Santa Barbara island [S. Cal.] very precisely but R&R just shows a dot), but sometimes R&R is better in certain areas. R&R usually shows more creeks. You can compare MG, Topo and R&R with the Garmin MapViewer at: http://www.garmin.com/cartography/mapSource/ . Be sure to zoom way in and click on More Detail to do the comparison in your area. I haven't used BlueChart, which gives you the same maps as regular paper nautical charts. It costs much more if you want maps for multiple areas and doesn't seem worth it to me unless you need the water depth information. Kenneth Johnson wrote: > Finally made the move to the Garmin GPSMAP 76. Am debating what > MapSource CD would offer the most shoreline detail: BlueChart, Roads & > Recreation, or Topo. From what I have been able to see on the Garmin > homepage, Topo has so much topo detail, it is hard to read the roads, and > many rural roads aren't included. Garmin recommends MetroGuide rather > than Roads & Rec because it has the auto trip planning function to any > destination you select, but the charts don't seem to offer as much > shoreline detail as Roads & Rec. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jun 04 2002 - 09:25:28 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:52 PDT