Matt wrote: >>I still can't figure out why the paddler made almost the same distance per stroke without also using more energy to go faster (when using a higher stroke rate with the narrower blade). It just doesn't compute. It takes a given amount of energy to move a given kayak at a given speed though the water. If you move it faster that takes more energy. Matt, It is simple, there was more net thrust available from one of the paddles than the other, with presumably the same apparent effort from the paddler. As far as reaching any general conclusions there are a couple of complicating factors: assuming the total power output was the same (which is not related to the stroke rate--lower force x higher stroke rate, or higher force x lower stroke rate could make the same power output), then faster speed would occur with the more efficient paddle, if you had the same power output. OTOH, if the higher stroke rate allowed for a more efficient use of the paddler's available energy because of better suited bio-mechanics of the body/muscle "machine" at the higher stroke rate, than more power would actually be available to create more thrust. So he may have put out more power, even though the effort felt the same. In either case, it is likely that he paddled at the rate he felt comfortable with each paddle at the same apparent effort level. The results was there was more net thrust with the higher aspect ratio blade and higher stroke rate than there was with the other, so he could maintain a higher speed (with the higher drag). Of course the difficulty is that this would vary for one person to the next, and the blade shapes and profiles are probably not the same, nor the weight of each paddle. And the higher speed may have favored that particular blade shape. It is entirely possible that a different weight, size and strength paddler would get different results. So without carefully controlled tests there are no general conclusions to be drawn here except that the higher aspect ratio paddle worked better for him on that day in those conditions. IF all other factors were the same, it can be proven [both theoretically and probably experimentally] that a higher aspect ratio blade will convert more of the available power into thrust than will the lower aspect ratio blade. The problem is there many other complicating factors, the least of which is the variation in human factors from one person to the next, which could nullify any meaningful gain with changes in aspect ratio. One thing for sure, more tests done under controlled conditions with different paddlers, and paddles would be very interesting. Peter *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jul 23 2002 - 19:52:51 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:55 PDT