At 12:59 AM -0700 7/27/02, Matt Broze wrote: > >Nick continued: >>>>>.Imagine two kayaks paddling side by side at the same speed. Guy A has >his paddle in the water for 1 second and then out for one second, the >Guy B is paddling with in the water for 2 seconds and out for 1. >They both will decelerate similarly between strokes, but Guy B will >not need to accelerate as much during the time his paddle in the >water. As a result he won't need to apply as much force and his >stroke will be more efficient.<<<<<, > >I don't think I can agree with that. Given--for the sake of simplicity--that >each paddler keeps his own paddling force equal throughout their stroking >time (but not equal between paddlers). They will both need to accelerate up >to the same speed again after each one second of rest and deceleration, but >guy B will have twice as long to do it so his rate of acceleration will be >only half that of guy A's. Guy A will make 6 strokes in 12 seconds while guy >B will have only taken 4 strokes to work against the kayaks (same) drag over >the same distance at the same speed. Therefore Guy B will be working against >the kayaks drag for a total of 8 seconds and have had 4 seconds of rest >while guy A will only be working against that same drag for 6 seconds of the >12 and have had 6 seconds of rest between strokes. Guy B only has to >accelerate back up to speed 4 times and guy A 6 times in the 12 seconds they >traveled the same distance at the same speed. The questions are who is >working harder and which strategy is most efficient? I don't know, and >unfortunately I'm not up to trying to figure out the math right now, Any of >the mathematically adept out there want to give it a shot? I did a little analysis in Excel. Bottom line: Guy B (slower cadence,longer stroke, same rest) works less. Obviously, the amount of effort saved depends on drag. With no drag, Guy B applies 75% of the force to maintain the same speed. I haven't worked out the math yet, but this results in the same amount of work. As drag increases the relative force required by Guy B decreases. As drag increases Guy B needs to apply less than 75% of the force while maintaining the same cadence. The advantage accumulates slowly, but it is perceptible. Because Guy B can apply his effort over a longer time he does not need to accelerate the kayak to as high a speed to maintain the same average speed. Since drag increases with speed he is working on moving a boat that has lower average drag. This means less force required and less overall effort. Because the effect is drag dependant (Higher speed -> more efficiency due to longer stroke) the effect will be most pronounced at higher speeds. While Guy B does not get as much rest, he is using less effort to maintain the same speed, so he does not need as much rest. I also ran the analysis with Guy B going at the same cadence as Guy A (ie a stroke every 2 seconds) but with a shorter coasting time. And as expected this saved even more effort than stretching out the stroke. BTW I chose the paddling rates based on being easy to deal with not because they were in any way reasonable. A 2 second long stroke is probably unreasonable, but it is easy to understand. -- Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 (860) 659-8847 *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon Jul 29 2002 - 09:47:21 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:56 PDT