PaddleWise by thread

From: James Durkin <jwd_at_phonogram.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:41:46 -0500
Recently I've become interested in picking up a bent-shaft (crank-shaft??)
paddle.  I got interested recently while looking for a 4-piece break-down
paddle for use with a folding kayak.  The Lendal caught my eye, for
various reasons.  Lendal features their bent-shaft paddles rather
prominently.  Recently, as of this year I guess, Werner got into the act
too.  The Werner design, however, is rather different in the position of
the bent areas, and in the relative position of the blades to the paddle
shaft centerline.  I'm unfamiliar with any other manufacturers producing
such paddles.

So my questions are:

1) Are there other manufacturers I've missed?

2) If you tried these paddles, what do you think of them as compared
   to various straight shaft paddles?

3) Theoretically, do you buy the argument(s) put forth for their
   use?

My one experience with a bent-shaft blade was with a Lendal Archipelago
last year.  While taking a BCU course, I opted for the equipment provided
by the firm offering the course (not wanting to car-top my own boat the
five or so hours each way to the class).  I had a miserable experience
with a boat that fit me poorly (despite making supposed arrangements in
advance of the class to make sure that wouldn't happen).  The paddle I got
was a pure fit too.  I eventually borrowed the above mentioned Lendal from
one of the instructors, and was able to maneuver much more easily than I
had been able to earlier.  It took some getting used to, but gave me good
control.  I forget the manufacturer and model of the first paddle, so
maybe I was comparing against absolute crap, but nonetheless it did peek
my interest.

-- 
James Durkin
jwd_at_phonogram.net
  -or-
jwd_at_acm.org

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:27:46 -0400
At 12:41 AM 9/11/02 -0500, James Durkin wrote:
>Recently I've become interested in picking up a bent-shaft (crank-shaft??)
>paddle.  I got interested recently while looking for a 4-piece break-down
>paddle for use with a folding kayak.  The Lendal caught my eye, for
>various reasons.  Lendal features their bent-shaft paddles rather
>prominently.  Recently, as of this year I guess, Werner got into the act
>too.  The Werner design, however, is rather different in the position of
>the bent areas, and in the relative position of the blades to the paddle
>shaft centerline.  I'm unfamiliar with any other manufacturers producing
>such paddles.

I've used both a bent shaft Lendal and a bent shaft Werner Kaliste.  A 
couple of weeks ago I helped lead a group of the coast of Newfoundland (as 
soon as the outfitter found out I had a lot of experience he volunteered me 
to help lead a group of 12 beginners).  He let me use his bent shaft 
Lendal.  I didn't like it.  The bend felt too far out from where I normally 
hold a paddle so I never felt secure bracing.  A friend of mine recently 
bought a 220cm Werner Kaliste (graphite) and I liked it quite a bit 
more.  I still prefer a straight shaft though.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gabriel L Romeu <romeug_at_erols.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, andrecommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 18:33:37 -0400
I went in with Lew C. from the list and got the Lendal
crankshaft which I really like.  This is not in disagreement
with John as I had the adjustable crankshaft shortened to
210-216 and I don't know where they trimmed the loom.  The
the spread of the bends are just fine.  I find less wrist
issues which can aggravate my carpal tunnel (on both
wrists), but I had long modified my stroke techniques to
compensate on the straight shaft.  Indexing is quite nice on
the crankshaft.
I still can't determine a preference for that, my very
lightweight Epic, or my newest stick.  They all great fun to
paddle with...gabriel


> I've used both a bent shaft Lendal and a bent shaft Werner Kaliste.  A
> couple of weeks ago I helped lead a group of the coast of Newfoundland (as
> soon as the outfitter found out I had a lot of experience he volunteered me
> to help lead a group of 12 beginners).  He let me use his bent shaft
> Lendal.  I didn't like it.  The bend felt too far out from where I normally
> hold a paddle so I never felt secure bracing.  

-- 
 gabriel l romeu 
ø http://studiofurniture.com ø
ø http://journalphoto.org ø 
ø http://kayakoutfitting.org ø
ø http://kayaknavigation.com ø
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gerald Foodman <klagjf_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 10:36:46 -0700
James,
I use an AT bent shaft paddle.  Very expensive, but my 7 other straight
shaft paddles are now for sale.  It took zero time to get used to it.  It
only takes time to get used to a straight shaft paddle nowadays, because the
straight shaft seems so unnatural.

Theoretical arguments are irrelevant.  You must try it.  I do not think all
bent shaft paddles are alike, but I have not tried any but the AT.

Jerry Foodman

> Recently I've become interested in picking up a bent-shaft (crank-shaft??)
> paddle.  > 1) Are there other manufacturers I've missed?
>
> 2) If you tried these paddles, what do you think of them as compared
>    to various straight shaft paddles?
>
> 3) Theoretically, do you buy the argument(s) put forth for their
>    use?


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:45:02 -0400
From: "James Durkin" <jwd_at_phonogram.net>

> 1) Are there other manufacturers I've missed?

Current Designs, AT, Phantom (or whatever it is from Wehnonah)

> 2) If you tried these paddles, what do you think of them as compared
>    to various straight shaft paddles?
> 
> 3) Theoretically, do you buy the argument(s) put forth for their
>    use?

I have a Lendal Archipelago and consider the bent shaft primarily useful 
if you need it.  Mine also has the variable center join so I can have any
feather angle I want.

If you tend to have joint problems, the bent shaft is worth it (assuming,
of course, the specific problem is in the wrist alignment that the bent
shaft corrects).  If you don't need it, then it's purely a preference that 
has a few real advantages and some potential disadvantages.

The disadvantages depend on whether you have a blade that leads the shaft,
trails the shaft or is neutral.  Few of the first are sold; most blades
trail the shaft.  Werner adds the extra bends to make it neutral.  If the
blade isn't neutral, it tends to "caster".  When I first used my Lendal in
a running draw, I nearly flipped over as the blade rotated in line with 
the water flow and pulled under the hull.

I like the way the paddle performs in rolling - it's easy to orient since
the bends make it almost self-orienting.  

The problem I have is that since making Greenland-style paddles (regular 
and a storm as a spare) I rarely use the Lendal. I just got back from 
Nova Scotia and used the Lendal to hold up the tarp.  I find the Greenland 
paddles provide the wrist correction (due to the closer hand position) and
also result in lower stress on the joints in general.  I'm seriously
considering selling the Lendal and sticking to the $20 paddles.

Mike
 


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Melissa Reese <melissa_at_bonnyweeboaty.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:53:04 -0700
On Wednesday, September 11, 2002, at 1:45:02 PM PST, Michael Daly
wrote:

> If you tend to have joint problems, the bent shaft is worth it
> (assuming, of course, the specific problem is in the wrist alignment
> that the bent shaft corrects). If you don't need it, then it's
> purely a preference that has a few real advantages and some
> potential disadvantages.

I agree with you here, and I'll add a little more from my
perspective...

Out of curiosity, I've tried several bent shaft paddles in the past,
and didn't like any of them. This is probably mostly due to my
preferred paddle handling style. I prefer a straight shaft because I
can freely move my hands along the shaft, effectively changing the
length of the paddle - or the width of my grip - for certain
maneuvers/conditions. This is how I've always used a "Euro" paddle.

For the past six months or so, I've been using West Greenland style
paddles exclusively, and basically have no desire to use a "Euro"
paddle anymore. I really like the sliding and extended paddle strokes
of the Greenland technique, and being able to slide my hands
comfortably all along the length of the narrow blades is a great plus
for me.

For years, I used only an 80 degree feather Werner, and never had any
problems with my wrists, hands, arms, etc., so rather than finding any
advantage to the bent shaft paddles, I found only limitations.

I've heard people refer to Greenland paddles as "variable length"
paddles, and it's one of the many things I really love about them. I
also like the fact that the blade faces are symmetrical. It's never a
problem finding the "correct" blade face! I also like it when people
tell me it looks like I'm paddling with a ski! :-)

Melissa
-- 
PGP public keys:
mailto:pgp_keys_at_gmx.co.uk?subject=0x46C29887&Body=Please%20send%20keys
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mary Z <mzuschlag_at_attbi.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Bent-shaft kayak paddles -- pros, cons, and recommendations
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:52:11 -0700
	So my questions are:

	1) Are there other manufacturers I've missed?

	2) If you tried these paddles, what do you think of them as compared
   	to various straight shaft paddles?

	3) Theoretically, do you buy the argument(s) put forth for their
   	use?

1)  I have an Adventure Technology (AT) bent shaft paddle and I love it!
When I loan out my paddle I often times have a hard time getting it back.

2)  I have tried Werner and Swift straight shaft paddles, they are good but
my wrists can't handle it.

3) Absolutely!  I have severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and my wrists have been
hammered by the disease.  I don't think I could paddle as much without a
bench shaft, my wrist simply could not take the punishment.  I feel MUCH
better with a bent shaft. I don't care about the scientific explanations; I
can tell you for someone with joint problems it is heavenly!
-- MZ


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:31 PDT