On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 11:13 AM, Gerald Foodman wrote: > I have been thinking about the wing and wonder if the following makes > sense. > > First a note on efficiency, which by > definition is the amount of energy loss, between the place you put > energy in > and the place you take it out. If you imagine a perfectly vertical > paddle, > drawn straight back parallel to the boat, then, BETWEEN THE BLADE AND > THE > BOAT'S FORWARD MOTION, there is no energy loss at all, INDEPENDENT OF > THE > SHAPE OF THE BLADE. (100% efficiency.) This is because all the work > you do > on the paddle goes into moving the boat forward. The paddle could be > square, or have holes in it and efficiency is still 100%. The paddle > is > just generating drag and changing the drag coefficient has no effect > energy > loss between the blade and forward motion. You are mistaking drag (a force) for energy. While it is true that for every Newton or pound of force generated by the paddler a equal and opposite unit of force is applied to the paddle by the water. All the force generated by the paddle is indeed transfer to the boat to make it move. This does not mean that all the energy is transferred without loss. The surest way to verify this is to look at the water. If there is any sign that the water moves at all due to the paddle, you must assume that there has been energy added water by the paddle. Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the water that could have been kinetic energy for the kayak. If there is energy in the water from the paddle that could have gone towards moving the boat, you must assume that the paddle is not 100% efficient. There is no such thing as a 100% efficient paddle. This is true regardless of the orientation of the blade or its direction of motion. > > Changing the size of the wing blade, or length of the paddle changes > the > gear ratio, just as for the conventional paddle, and should be chosen > for > the best efficiency of the particular paddler and the particular > distance/speed he is racing. The paddler is a motor, and like any > motor, is > most efficient at a particular speed, which is generally not the speed > for > maximum torque. > Changing the size of the blade does not change the gear ratio. The "gear ratio" is only related to the length of the paddle. Changing the size of the blade changes the speed at which it moves through the water, in other words it changes its efficiency. This is more analogous to having a bicycle chain skip or jump on the gears or having the gear rotate slightly relative to the peddle. Changing the blade size does effect the perceived gear ratio because for a given cadence it will take less force, and for a given force it will require a higher cadence. There are good reasons why people don't use huge blades on their paddle, but everything else being equal, smaller blade area means lower efficiency. There are practical reasons like a paddle with 4' x 8' blades would be hard to fit in the car, would be heavy and would just be awkward to swing around. You need to be able to get a paddle in and out of the water fairly easily and the physical construction of humans place certain limits on what is practical and comfortable. And diminishing returns means that at some point the added efficiency just isn't worth the other problems which come with large size. The right balance of overall efficiency of the paddle and comfort for a given paddler will effect the optimum size for the paddler. Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 USA Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847 http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Fri Jun 06 2003 - 10:40:40 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:07 PDT