I have had the impression that students of paddle design are convinced, based on testimonials and math equations, that one sort of paddle will allow or encourage a more efficient stroke than can be accomplished using a longer or different paddle. In order to test the question, one must have expectations about the outcome of the tests. For me, the only issue of interest concerns whether or not one paddle or another allows the engine driving the boat at some constant speed for some fixed distance to do so with greater efficiency. That means doing less work with one paddle than with another to achieve that constant speed over the fixed distance. Do you believe that such a difference, if it exists, will be detectable? What % change in work is anticipated? Do you think this change will be statistically detectable (significant at the 95% level)? Would you accept the possibility that there is no difference in the work required to push the boat as described above, but that under certain circumstances, sets of muscle better suited for sustained paddling are brought into play with certain paddles, which causes the perception that "less work" is being required to drive the boat? I would appreciate a clearer discussion about the nature of the questions being proposed for testing. Thanks, Chuck Sutherland *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Jun 21 2003 - 14:43:06 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:08 PDT