> we share that tangential relationship with divers, board > surfers, waterfowl hunters, recreational fishermen, commercial fishermen, > water skiers, swimmers, wind surfers, sailors, etc. That's a point that is being missed by a lot of people --- in most states, navigable waters are held in public trust, meaning they are for everyone to use, and are in effect public property. To exclude anyone would be discrimination. Sure, I like to have the water to myself, and so does everyone else. There are just plain too many people to accomodate everyone's wishes. That's one of the reasons that waters are held in public trust -- to keep one group from barring all others from using "their" waters. If you have a gripe with a particular type of craft, lobby to correct the craft's shortcomings, or to lower speed limits on particular bodies of water. It is possible to build cleaner-burning power craft (They did it with cars!), and add mufflers, and fuel and oil spillage safeguards. Nobody wants to spend the money to do it, and nobody wants to pay the taxes required to enforce it. So back to the beginning we go..... As nice as it may be to have an "X type of craft only" area, it sets a dangerous precedent for the future. At least that's how I see it. Wayne Smith wsmith16_at_charter.net Check out my website! http://webpages.charter.net/wsmith16/home.html *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
[Moderator's Note: Quoted content mildly altered. Excessive quoting (including headers/footers/sig lines/extraneous text from previous posts, etc.) have been removed. Please edit quoted material in addition to removing header/trailers when replying to posts.] Hi Robert, thanks for your post. Maybe I didn't use a correct analogy. My appologies. I was not thinking about oil tankers of the shipping kind, but of such activities which allowed our water resources to burn just a couple of decades ago. It was conservation that cleaned our water world up. Our waters are as much at risk from mountain top mining as commercialism as from lack of conservation to preseve what we have. cheers, tom martin ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert A. Glantz, Jr. > The extremism of some of the environmental members are what > turn the rest of us off to their message. > > Rolling in an oil slick? As if they are PURPOSELY trying to > lose MILLIONS of $$$ when a tanker runs aground or spills MILLIONS of > $$$ in crude oil.. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:36 PDT