> PS The S4 sail area is 5 sq meters (about 50 sq. ft). 5 sq.m is about 55 sq.ft; I've looked through your new pictures, and was prompted to read all 4 phases of Dal's website again. His final rig is 68 sq.ft (28sq.ft jib + 40 sq.ft Optimist, though listed 35 in specs). He tends to solve problems cheap, I tried this too, but eventually had to buy from Balogh and Folbot, and don't regret. Dal claims an excellent upwind sailing with only 35 (40) sq.ft sail, so your S4 must be equally good with proper rudder and proper leeboard. He also says, btw, that his home-made leeboard (looks at least same big as Klepper's) is too small to prevent a leeway. May be I was too pessimistic about 60-65 degrees upwind sailing after fighting with currents, and missing last ferry to mainland :-). It could be 50-55 deg, but I doubt it was anything better with an aft 32 sq.ft rig. I'm planning to add another, fore sail (smaller, perhaps 24 sq.ft) to my 32 sq.ft aft sail on a hardshell kayak. Mark Balogh assured me once that upwind rigs are "natural upwind climbers". Not really, as I've found. Of course, he knows a lot and could mean something else. Yes, they tend to turn into wind, but don't tend to sail well in this direction :-)... Also, tacking with an aft sail always involves 2-3 paddling strokes, and larger rudder is needed (and preferably foiled). Such adaptations are sometimes unique, - I couldn't find anybody with an aft rig on hardshell kayak or Feathercraft Kahuna, except for experimental Kahuna aft rig by Mark Balogh, not suitable for my purposes. Though, with Kahuna my task was easier due to Tony Niilus project with K1: http://www.geocities.com/niilus/ . Most of dimensions I had to change, adapting it to my boat. Round tubes are probaly used on seas for aerodynamical and uniform strength considerations. 20 * 20 mm square tube has a diagonal same as 20 mm round tube, which means same size at certain directions as in 20mm round tube (= same wind resistance, or even higher due to turbulence around corners) , but I.m not sure how much stronger is a square one. And even then it will be stronger in some directions and weaker in others, while round one has uniform strength. Just thinking aloud... *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Jul 20 2004 - 22:25:22 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:15 PDT