[Paddlewise] Mirage vs Barton et al.

From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 11:02:51 -0300
I suspect a number of factors. Certanly the steady power output made a huge
difference. Also the difference between leg and arm power. I have not looked
closely at the Mirage propulsion system but it may have a design more
suitable for low speed high thrust than high speed. Sort of like the
difference between a tug boat and a destroyer. The one has a large propellor
operating at low speed and the other  a smaller propellor operating at high
speed. They may have had a much different result had they had the battle
between a sprint canoeist and the Mirage. Sprint canoeists use huge paddles
(realatively speaking) and lots of upper body strength. At the top level
canoeists will pull away form kayaks in the first 50  to 100 meters and then
fall behind.

Wouldn't you love to see a power curve for the two.

Yes, Matt, you probably have it right - they sucker punched Barton.

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 07:03:26 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:16 PDT