PeterO wrote; > Interesting analysis, though I hope and suspect that like computer generated > music, computer designed kayaks will only ever be a small niche market. Are > cars designed this way? Some notes about using computers in design work. Computers do not design much of anything. I asked mine to design a kayak and left it on for week but nothing happened. Turns out you have to do it yourself. The computer does help with the drawing and calculations though. It helps if you actually know something about design first since you can design bad boat faster on a computer just as easily (or maybe more easily) than designing a good boat.. I think one can fairly say that most things made in industrialized nations for the mass market (and not so mass market) these days take advantage of computers at some stage in the design process. The CAD drawings produced with them provide the information needed for machining and mold making. CAD drawings provide greater accuracy, faster mold production and more accurate machining. far from "being a niche" market products designed using computers have become mainstream. Computers do not design different boats or better boats or worse boats than any other method. People still do the design work. The computer just makes it easier to do. I suspect that the majority of kayaks sold in the USA had plugs or molds made from CAD drawings and machined on CNC machines. These days CNC machines have gotten ridiculously cheap and people who do that kind of work seem to have more than they can do. Most of those Stitch and glue kit boats you see had their designs created on a computer and the parts cut out on a CNC machine. Oh, and yes, most cars get born on computer terminals. > Re modular kayaks, seems we could again learn from the past. I have never > seen craft so beautiful as the sailing boats built by the Indonesians and > the Torres Strait Islanders a few centuries ago. Apparently there was quite > a trade in dugout hulls which were exported from the Indonesian mainland, > where hardwood was readily available. They were sold all over the Torres > Strait Islands where they were outfitted with decks, mast, sails and rigging > wonderfully constructed from palm leaf, bamboo and lines woven from hemp. I don't know about learning it from the Torres Strait islanders but boat builders have sold hull shells (and other parts) to other builders for as long as I have worked in the boat industry (since 1960). They were sold all over the North America where they were outfitted with decks, mast, sails and rigging wonderfully constructed from wood, fiberglass and synthetic lines made from petroleum products. Some even benefited from products made from hemp. ;-) I apologize for that but sometimes I can't control myself. I suspect a lot of the misunderstandings about the topic of copies stems from misunderstandings about what constitutes a copy versus what constitutes derivation. Since even the courts have problems with this it should come as no surprise. Few designers have any problem with people designing or building boats that incorporate certain features that they use in their designs whether individually or in concert. Many, however, get puckered up when the "new" boat looks too much like their own. What constitutes "too much"? There lies the problem. Even if the designers think they know, the courts may not agree. More importantly you may not find two judges or juries that agree on the same case. In a small industry like kayak and canoe building where legal remedies don't make any sense due to their cost it becomes a matter of individual integrity and an educated public. If the buying public could learn to respect the effort that original designers put into the product they enjoy so much maybe they would reject copies. I have found that most people can recognize a near copy when they see it especially when they have the original beside it. Contrary to what we have occasionally read here boats do not get better because of copies and near copies. They get better when designers and builders think creatively. Cheers John Winters *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
G'Day, John and Matt, John wrote: - >Computers do not design much of anything. I asked >mine to design a kayak and left it on for week but >nothing happened. Glad to hear it! But can computers really not design boats? IF boat performance could be characterised by a set of equations or heuristics and IF a boat designer or set of boat designers could incorporate their knowledge into a computer via an Expert Systems program, then surely all a customer need do is enter a set of requirements and choose the color. Whether it would be a good boat or not who knows. Or perhaps its fair to say the design was carried out 'generically' by the expert, because he answered the questions put by the Expert System program during its training phase? Desite the above I don't believe that computers or equations are anywhere near subtle enough or sophisticated enough to take the place of a human brain in designing something as complicated as a truly great kayak. (now thats begging for a response!!) >I think one can fairly say that most things made in >industrialized nations for the mass market (and not >so mass market) these days take advantage of >computers at some stage in the design process. Agree and have been grateful many times for their CAD/CAM/CNC help. (I've designed one or two CNC systems, but that was years ago) >They were sold all over the North America where they were >outfitted with decks, mast, sails and rigging wonderfully >constructed from wood, fiberglass and synthetic lines made >from petroleum products. Some even benefited from products >made from hemp. ;-) Touche, Loved the "lack of self control"! But that Torres Strait boat was beautiful! Didn't know that hulls were sold as you described. Do they do this for kayaks yet? Regarding copying in general, I agree with all you say, wholeheartedly. And regarding creativity, I know very little about kayak design but on looking at the pictures of Matts boat the hull asymmetry from bow to stern struck me as inspired. The way the chines seem to disappear halfway and the 'fixed rudder' takes over, it looks as if seat movement, or even better, body lean could be used to very great effect with such a hull. But I don't intend this in any way as a comment on the debate between Peter Treby and Matt Broze where the issues seem to be deeper and also I don't want to comment in Dave's absence. If there are still issues between Matt and Dave and If Matt thinks its worth it, I would be prepared to approach Dave, who I regard as a friend, and see if something can be resolved. By the way I haven't discussed this with Dave. He lives 500km south of Sydney, but I want to see him anyway. I know this is not a perfect solution. Matt if you think this is worth trying would you be willing to brief me privately? I would respect your confidence and Dave's absolutely. All the best, PeterO *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
On Aug 17, 2004, at 7:36 AM, John Winters wrote: > PeterO wrote; > >> Interesting analysis, though I hope and suspect that like computer > generated >> music, computer designed kayaks will only ever be a small niche >> market. > Are >> cars designed this way? > > Some notes about using computers in design work. > > Computers do not design much of anything. I asked mine to design a > kayak and > left it on for week but nothing happened. Turns out you have to do it > yourself. The computer does help with the drawing and calculations > though. > It helps if you actually know something about design first since you > can > design bad boat faster on a computer just as easily (or maybe more > easily) > than designing a good boat.. The Godzilla portion of the Michlet analysis program is as close to a computer designing a hull as I know of at this point. Of course this only "designs" the part of the boat below the waterline and leaves the above water shape to the human designer. For those unfamiliar with Godzilla, it works with the drag prediction program Michlet. It creates a random family of hull shapes which are constrained to things like length, width, displacement, etc by the user. It then lets Michlet analyze all the hulls. It selects the one that best fits a suitability factor. This factor would typically be the lowest drag at a given speed or range of speeds. From this choice it randomly distorts the hull shape by a small amount to create another family of hull shapes. Which it then analyzes to find the best one. It repeats this process until the user gets tired of waiting. In this way it can attempt to evolve an "optimum" hull shape within the desired constraints. While it is still up to the user to determine the constraints (thus acting as a designer) it is the computer that determines the ultimate shape. I have used this system to define the below-the-water hull shape for one design as a science experiment and I am happy with the results. There was still a lot of work to create a above-water-shape but the wetted hull shape seems good. With ever increasing capabilities to analyze varying aspects of performance, it is at least conceivable that this type of system could provide more and more sophisticated design creation possibilities. For example, rough water drag components could be added to find an "optimum" design for going at a desired speed into a given sea state. Performance characteristics such as maneuverability could at least theoretically be included. It would still be up to the user/designer to choose the constraints and desired characteristics to optimize. But then maybe you could leave the computer for a week and actually see something kayak-like result when you come back. Of course it might take a month to create the appropriate set of constraints. Nick Schade Guillemot Kayaks 824 Thompson St Glastonbury, CT 06033 USA Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847 http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/ *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
G'Day John and Nick, Nick wrote: - >The Godzilla portion of the Michlet analysis >program is as close to a computer designing >a hull as I know of at this point. Appreciated your explanation on using computers in kayak design and the description of Godzilla and Michlet. Someone told me today I wouldn't see a fusion power station until after I was dead - sounds like automating the leap from a paddlers description of the boat they want, to specifications and then to design constraints is going to take just as long. Can't say I'm unhappy about that:~) John Winters wrote: - >I know some companies that might sell hulls. I was just reminded of a debate on seam strength some years ago. Would the strength of the bond between a fully cured deck and a fully cured hull be adequate for a sea kayak? i.e could it be made as strong as a well made join between a partially cured deck and hull? All the best, PeterO *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
Peter replied (snip): >Touche, Loved the "lack of self control"! But that Torres Strait boat was beautiful! Didn't know that hulls were sold as you described. Do they do this for kayaks yet?< Looks like someone supplied a wooden kayak builder with a Kevlar hull here. Click on the Kevlar-woodstrip hybrid project: http://www.homegrownboats.com/ Hmmm, homegrown. Maybe John should also look at this site, and make comment (perhaps we will get a "Froudean"-slip or two). Doug Lloyd Victoria BC *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:38 PDT