RE: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles

From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 06:39:59 -0700
I paddled with a Greenland paddle for a while and experienced all the
benefits to joints, tendons, etc, that you and all the others have
described. My cruising speeds did not seem at all diminished. All my
ailments went away and when I returned to the Euro paddle they returned. I
always paddle un-feathered so none of this was due to dealing with feather
angles.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with your assessment that once buried, the
Greenland has the bite of a Euro. Paddles operate similarly to wings. High
aspect ratio wings have high lift-to-drag ratios, which is why they are seen
on high performance aircraft. Low aspect ratio wings have more lift in when
stalled so the transition from flying to stalled is less abrupt. This is why
they are seen on trainer aircraft and aircraft that must operate off short
fields.

Effective Greenland strokes all seem to revolve around "flying" the blade,
even the forward stroke. When it comes to "stalled" strokes such as braces
(non-sculled) and raw standing start acceleration, the Euro (lower aspect
ratio) has the advantage.

It's not just about surface area.

That makes sense from a theoretical standpoint (everything I know about
wings is in this email, so please don't probe any deeper!), but is also my
personal observation. Accelerating out through the surf or out from behind a
reef was much more trying with a Greenland paddle.

Still, I'm thinking of returning to a Greenland paddle for sea kayak
cruising to preserve all my body parts so they are ready for abuse when
surfing and rock gardening - with a euro paddle.

One recent revelation for me (though I'm sure I was the last to figure it
out) is the dramatic difference between different "euro" paddles when it
comes to inflicting pain on the body. I have been paddling exclusively with
203CM WW paddles for all my paddling for the past couple of years. They have
short fat blades and stiff large diameter shafts. The pain factor has
definitely increased, but I thought it was just due to getting older. 
In the past few weeks I decided to try a longer (220CM) touring paddle with
longer narrower (relatively) blades for touring. I wanted to see if I could
increase my speed for covering distance. The difference was dramatic. I
could feel the shaft flexing like it was made from rubber. I got used to
this very quickly, I think my speed did increase a little, but most
important benefit was that pain was dramatically reduced both while paddling
and the next day. 

By the way, why are they called "euro" paddles? Some of the pictures of
native North Pacific paddles look a lot like "euro" paddles to me. Seems
like they come from the American continent and should therefore be called
"American" paddles.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
............. The difference is in the "aspect ratio" of the blade 
- longer and thinner on the Greenland blade, which provides for a more 
gradual entry and "catch". But once the blade is in the water - all the 
blade - the surface areas of the Greenland and the Euro are essentially 
identical and you can generate as much power as you want, every time. ....

Every stroke which can be done with a Euro can be done with a Greenland
..........

Bill Hansen
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Sat Sep 04 2004 - 06:40:25 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:17 PDT