PaddleWise by thread

From: Peter Chopelas <pac_at_premier1.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] [PaddleWise] Clarification?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:40:14 -0700
 John Winters wrote:

>I suspect that a lot of the confusion comes from assuming the objective is
high lift as opposed to high thrust per unit area.  If we change the
question from How do we generate more lift? to How do we generate more
thrust we may get another answer.

Why are you assuming that the important objective is high thrust per unit
area?  I think there is another element that is more important perhaps than
thrust per unit area.  I can not see how thrust per unit area is even
relevant to what is important to a paddler.  I would think that for long
distance paddling what you want to measure and optimize is thrust output per
power input (the power input is the work rate of the paddler's muscles),
this would yield the maximum distance for a given available energy.  For a
racer you would want to measure and maximize thrust output per force input
(at the shaft), this would yield the maximum speed for a given paddler's
strength.  The maximum thrust that can be generated from a given blade size
is not necessarily the most efficient paddle, efficiency has to be measured
as energy in vs. energy out, or more accurately thrust output vs. work
input.

An aircraft analogy is Short Take-off and Landing airplanes (STOL).  The
wings are shaped to generate high lift per unit area, at the expense of a
very draggy wing design in normal cruise (higher speed) mode.  The highest
lift per unit area on a wing yields a very slow and inefficient aircraft.
The most efficient aircraft do not have high lift wings, but rather high L/D
(or lift to drag ratio) wings.

Although the area of the blade may be indirectly related to these things,
ISTM that if you do not establish the correct measurements you will end up
with meaningless results.

Peter
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 18:08:35 -0400
On 14 Sep 2004 at 20:40, Peter Chopelas wrote:

> efficiency has to be measured
> as energy in vs. energy out, 

One measure of efficiency is energy in vs out.  There can be other 
efficiencies measured.


> or more accurately thrust output vs. work input.

One's a vector, the other's a scalor; the units of measure don't 
match. You're were better off with energy in and out.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 16:54:07 -0700
Peter wrote:

> > or more accurately thrust output vs. work input.

To which Michael Daly" <mikedaly_at_magma.ca> replied:

> One's a vector, the other's a scalor; the units of measure don't
> match. You're were better off with energy in and out.

True, they usually refer to different things:  one is a force, and the other
is a work unit.  I wonder if Peter is using "thrust" in some different way
than what I have normally seen.  Can "thrust" refer to foot-pounds?  I
always thought it meant force.  Maybe Peter can clear this up.

I think the comparison to make might be the work the paddle does on the
water (how in heck you would measure that, I don't know) compared to the
work input by the paddler on the paddle.  I bet the former is what Peter
means by "thrust."

I agree with Peter's suggestion that monitoring (and normalizing) a
paddler's respiratory demand is perhaps a decent way to eliminate or reduce
differences in real effort by the paddler.

--
Dave Kruger
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:39 PDT