PaddleWise by thread

From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:21:52 -0300
.
Tord wrote;

> But, the high aspect ratio wing works by having the flow chord-wise,
> across the wing at right angles, which hardly is the case with a Greenland
> paddle, rather the reverse, as most of the flow on a GP paddle is 
> spanwise,

I wonder if this really applies. As I understand the stroke described by 
some who use High Aspect Ratio paddles the flow is across the chord as the 
blade slices in an arc from the surface to a more vertical orientation at 
the bottom of the stroke. If I have this wrong maybe the GP people can 
straighten me out.

> Oars are pretty much like GP paddles, and the longer the blades the more
> efficient I find them, till they get impractically long. And you can, on a
> windless evening, easily see how much longer the vortices remain in
> the water when using better oars!

This is an interesting comment. When I was designing rowing shells just 
about every competitor had shifted over to the modern "hatchet" style of 
blade. I did not see any other type during the recent Olympics but then they 
didn't focus much on oars in the coveage. Have they gone back to the old 
narrow blades?

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Paul Ash <AshP_at_sundaytimes.co.za>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 18:33:41 +0200
Nick wrote:

>I frequently here people talk about paddles working like wings

Aircraft wings create lift because air moves faster over the upper, curved
surface of the wing therefore the air pressure decreases, creating a force
that 'pulls' the wing upwards, ie. lift.

So, I don't see how a forward-stroking Greenland paddle is similar to that of
a glider wing in flight. Like you say, wings produce lift, not propulsion.

Cheers

Paul
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 15:43:39 -0400
A better analogy may be a propeller instead of a glider wing, but I 
still don't see it working as the Greenland stroke is described. With a 
prop, the blades are foil sections which produce thrust through lift.

On Sep 7, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Paul Ash wrote:

> Nick wrote:
>
>> I frequently here people talk about paddles working like wings
>
> Aircraft wings create lift because air moves faster over the upper, 
> curved
> surface of the wing therefore the air pressure decreases, creating a 
> force
> that 'pulls' the wing upwards, ie. lift.
>
> So, I don't see how a forward-stroking Greenland paddle is similar to 
> that of
> a glider wing in flight. Like you say, wings produce lift, not 
> propulsion.
>
Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 08:07:25 -0400
At 03:43 PM 9/7/2004 -0400, Nick Schade wrote:
>A better analogy may be a propeller instead of a glider wing, but I still 
>don't see it working as the Greenland stroke is described. With a prop, 
>the blades are foil sections which produce thrust through lift.

When describing how a paddle can produces lift, in the context of using the 
paddle when sculling for support or for a low/high brace turn, the analogy 
that I usually use is remembering what happens when you put your hand out 
the window of a moving vehicle.  Holding your hand with your fingers 
pointing forward it's easy to feel the effect of raising or lowering your 
fingers.  With just a very small raise of the fingers your hand and arm 
will move up.  Raising the fingers more causes the hand not only to move 
up, but to move backwards as well.  Lower your fingers and the hand dives.

Translating that to the paddle, such that the angle of the paddle blade has 
the leading edge slightly higher than the trailing edge, and the paddle 
will produce lift, and thus support, for a sculling brace or high/low brace 
turn.

Greg Stamer also presented an interesting idea when I did a training 
session with him a couple of years ago.  He was talking about the exit 
portion of the stroke when using a GP.  As a demonstration we stuck the 
paddle in next to our hip with the paddle at about a 30 degree angle. Then, 
rather than pulling back with the paddle we just lifted straight 
up.  Although nobody was setting any speed records it was clear that 
lifting the paddle straight up with the paddle angled was producing some 
forward momentum
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Tord Eriksson <tord_at_tord.nu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Greenland vs Euro paddles
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 00:44:30 +0200
Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com> wrote:

> I frequently here people talk about paddles working like wings and am 
> prepared to accept that it is possible. Yet whenever I ask people to 
> describe how the paddle is working like a wing, their explanations fall 
> flat.

> People like to talk about how Greenland paddles are similar to glider 
> wings etc. But, they never seem to be able to explain how the motion of 
> a forward-stroking Greenland paddle is similar to that of a glider wing 
> through the air.

I agree 100% with Nick, but is not incorrect when Steve Brown wrote:
>High
> aspect ratio wings have high lift-to-drag ratios, which is why they 
> are seen
> on high performance aircraft. Low aspect ratio wings have more lift in 
> when
> stalled so the transition from flying to stalled is less abrupt. This 
> is why
> they are seen on trainer aircraft and aircraft that must operate off 
> short
> fields.

But, the high aspect ratio wing works by having the flow chord-wise,
across the wing at right angles, which hardly is the case with a Greenland
paddle, rather the reverse, as most of the flow on a GP paddle is spanwise,
thus similar to the aerodynamic lift a Sidewinder missile produces from its
body, a lift entirely dependent of vortices - a modern missile can pull 50 G's
in turns, which no high aspect ratio wing ever will be able to, not least to 
their sudden stalls!

So for the vortex system to start you have to push the paddle down and then 
pull backward (same as with a Euro paddle), but due to the GP's extremely
low aspect ratio it eventually produces a more energized vortex, I would 
persume, than the Euro, that has more bite initially, but eventually have 
poorer vortex attachment, due to its shorter blade length.

Oars are pretty much like GP paddles, and the longer the blades the more
efficient I find them, till they get impractically long. And you can, on a 
windless evening, easily see how much longer the vortices remain in 
the water when using better oars! 

I think flutter is the restricting factor when it comes to oars, actually :-)!

Tord
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:39 PDT