PaddleWise by thread

From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 13:43:11 -0300
To my knowledge no one has ever provided proof that one could apply steady 
state theory to paddles. Simply quoting steady state theory does not qualify 
as proof.

Until some one can provide actual test data to support the assumptions that 
rthe esult of steady state flow is sufficently close to the pulsed flow of 
paddles then we cannot lend much credence to it.

I suspect that a lot of the confusion comes from assuming the objective is 
high lift as opposed to high thrust per unit area.  If we change the 
question from How do we generate more lift? to How do we generate more 
thrust we may get another answer.

Another problem we should condsider in the quest for high lift has to do 
with the difficulty in maintaining any angle of attack through the water 
much less the ideal angle of attack. Can paddlers actually achieve and 
maintain the desired angle of attack? How does one compensate for the 
variability in angle of attack due to the ever changing flow direction in 
waves? (with the wave at the crest, vertical down on the front face, against 
the wave direction in the trough and vertically up on the back and, of 
course, everything in between)

Cheers

John Winters 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 14:41:53 -0400
I'm not even certain that we can get to the point where we can worry 
about angle of attack to achieve lift. Any kind of lift is going to 
require the paddle blade move perpendicularly to the direction of boat 
motion. This is either up-down or left-right motion. Paddlers arms are 
pretty short and don't allow much side-to-side motion (maybe 14 - 18"), 
and as long as we are sitting in the middle of a boat, vertical motion 
is limited.

The largest range of motion available to a paddler is available by 
reaching forward and pulling back (about 3' to 4'). It is possible to 
push the blade out to the side a bit while pulling back, but the range 
of motion is substantially limited. There does appear to be some 
benefit to swinging the blade out away from the boat, but this may have 
as much to do with keeping the blade in "clean", undisturbed, still 
water as it does with generating significant "lift".

Since it is so hard to move the paddle in a manner to generate thrust 
with lift, it would seem to be jumping the gun to analyze the virtues 
of different foil configurations. The only stroke I've seen that has 
the potential to generate lift is the wing paddle stroke, and it isn't 
even established they really benefit from lift. We can produce all 
kinds of equation demonstrating the benefits of high-aspect ratio, but 
if the blade doesn't move right, what is the point?

Nick


On Sep 9, 2004, at 12:43 PM, John Winters wrote:

> Another problem we should condsider in the quest for high lift has to 
> do with the difficulty in maintaining any angle of attack through the 
> water much less the ideal angle of attack. Can paddlers actually 
> achieve and maintain the desired angle of attack? How does one 
> compensate for the variability in angle of attack due to the ever 
> changing flow direction in waves? (with the wave at the crest, 
> vertical down on the front face, against the wave direction in the 
> trough and vertically up on the back and, of course, everything in 
> between)

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:24:17 -0700
You can feel the paddle stall, or go deeper into stall. This is extremely
intuitive as (once experienced) we constantly adjust blade angle to get the
right bite.

Like intercepting a fly ball, it's something any practiced child can do, but
would cost millions to try and get a machine to do it.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
....... How does one compensate for the 
variability in angle of attack due to the ever changing flow direction in 
waves? (with the wave at the crest, vertical down on the front face, against

the wave direction in the trough and vertically up on the back and, of 
course, everything in between)

Cheers

John Winters 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 20:59:24 -0300
Steve wrote;

>You can feel the paddle stall, or go deeper into stall. This is extremely
>intuitive as (once experienced) we constantly adjust blade angle to get the
>right bite.

Do you have any tests that prove you can 1. detect stall and discern it from 
any other forces acting on the paddle and 2. Adjust the angle of attack 
rapidly enough to make a difference? By this I mean tests I can perform to 
verify or refute your claim.

If not you will have to forgive me for my skepticism. According to people in 
the field of psychokinetics what you suggest might prove revolutionary.

>Like intercepting a fly ball, it's something any practiced child can do, 
>but
>would cost millions to try and get a machine to do it.

Not sure eye/hand co-ordination has much to do with it.

A for intercepting a fly ball, the US has has already spent billions trying 
to intercept missles. Maybe they would have better luck with the fly balls 
and for less money. :-)

Cheers

John Winters. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:00:13 -0700
Skepticism is healthy.

Use a sculling brace to prove your paddle is a wing that can stall.

When a wing is flying, increasing AOA increases lift. A stall is when
increasing AOA does not increase lift. Continuing to increase it beyond that
critical AOA will actually decrease lift. Drag, however, continues to
increase with AOA. The AOA at which a wing stalls does not change with air
speed, or the weight on the wing. Airspeed effects the lift a wing produces
for a given AOA and the weight on the wing determines how much lift is
required to keep it aloft..

The procedure for stall recovery in an airplane is to put the nose down
(reduce angle of attack), use gravity (and full power) to regain airspeed
(increase lift) so that the weight of the airplane can again be carried
without exceeding the maximum AOA, and then level out.

With a kayak paddle, a stall is most easily experienced when bracing. The
procedure for stall recovery during a paddle brace is sculling. Effectively
reducing the AOA, and regaining water speed across the blade so that
adequate lift can be maintained without again exceeding the maximum
acceptable angle of attack.

Many, if not all on this list can easily manipulate their paddle during a
sculling brace to prevent it from stalling. Too much AOA and you start
kicking up tons of water (increased drag), but you still continue to sink
(loss of lift). As you slow or speed up sculling, you will intuitively (once
practiced) increase or decrease the AOA to maintain the lift necessary for
the brace.

I know what a wing stall feels like, because I've done it in an airplane. On
the other hand, I can't prove that it was a stall because I didn't
specifically measure airflow separation. On the other hand (that's three
hands), the stall horn was blaring, the nose dropped, and it had all the
symptoms of dramatic reduction in the lift-to-drag ratio. Same with a paddle
brace (except the stall horn)

I think most who have paddled with a Greenland paddle can feel the effect.
If the angle of attack gets too high, the blade dramatically loses lift
(thrust, or whatever the term should be in a kayak). That is why the stroke
always morphs into one that keeps the blade flying. I will not insist that I
keep the blade from stalling entirely during a forward stroke, because
stalled wings do produce lift, but I am sure that I am keeping it from going
too deeply into a stall, and possibly keep it out of stall for most of the
stroke.  The effect of stalling (or deep stall) for a forward stroke would
be reduced efficiency, which is much more subtle than a failed brace. It
took me a while to learn not to just yank the blade back through the water,
and I'm not sure if I ever really mastered it to full efficiency (probably
didn't)

Have I proven that this is a stall? No, but it has all the same symptoms as
a wing stall so I'm content assuming that it is one in the absence of
conflicting information (which I am open to if shared).

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
....

Do you have any tests that prove you can 1. detect stall and discern it from

any other forces acting on the paddle and 2. Adjust the angle of attack 
rapidly enough to make a difference? By this I mean tests I can perform to 
verify or refute your claim.

.....

Cheers

John Winters. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:23:50 -0400
On 9 Sep 2004 at 18:00, Steve Brown wrote:

> Many, if not all on this list can easily manipulate their paddle 
> during a sculling brace to prevent it from stalling.

This is true if the paddle is fully submerged.  If you're talking 
about a paddle blade on the surface, then the blade is planing and 
we're not dealing with lift.  Increasing the "AoA" of a planing blade 
means that you're changing the ability to plane and the behavior is 
not the same as a stall.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:17:18 -0700
I understand lift decently, but I have to admit I'm not quite sure about the
mechanics behind planning at all.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
 This is true if the paddle is fully submerged.  If you're talking 
about a paddle blade on the surface, then the blade is planing and 
we're not dealing with lift.  Increasing the "AoA" of a planing blade 
means that you're changing the ability to plane and the behavior is 
not the same as a stall.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Clarification?
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:37:55 -0300
Steve wrote;

SNIP
Thanks for the discussion on stall but I already knew that. What I hoped to 
read was how you could prove you could detect and respond to stall in your 
paddle stroke.

>I know what a wing stall feels like, because I've done it in an airplane.

Does the magnitude of the effect help you in the airplane? I too have 
experienced it in an airplane and it was damned dramatic. Given the forces 
etc. on a paddle it doesn't sound equivalent.

>I think most who have paddled with a Greenland paddle can feel the effect.
>If the angle of attack gets too high, the blade dramatically loses lift
>(thrust, or whatever the term should be in a kayak).

Can most feel it? How do you know? Once you lose lift how do you separate 
the sensation of increased drag from the loss of lift particularly when you 
may have little or no decrease in boat speed?

>That is why the stroke
>always morphs into one that keeps the blade flying.

Always? (See below)

>I will not insist that I keep the blade from stalling entirely during a 
>forward stroke, because
>stalled wings do produce lift, but I am sure that I am keeping it from 
>going
>too deeply into a stall, and possibly keep it out of stall for most of the
>stroke.  The effect of stalling (or deep stall) for a forward stroke would
>be reduced efficiency, which is much more subtle than a failed brace. It
>took me a while to learn not to just yank the blade back through the water,
>and I'm not sure if I ever really mastered it to full efficiency (probably
>didn't)

My point exactly but without the optimism. Keep in mind that paddlers using 
GP paddles and a drag oriented stroke can, at cruising speeds at least, 
keep up with other GP using paddlers supposedly using lift oriented strokes. 
How do you tell what part of the stroke is stall or lift if the resultant 
thrust remains the same or similar?

>Have I proven that this is a stall? No, but it has all the same symptoms as
>a wing stall so I'm content assuming that it is one in the absence of
>conflicting information (which I am open to if shared).

Most know that GP paddles can stall . I asked if you could prove that you 
could both recognize it during the stroke and make the appropriate 
adjustments to the angle of attack to stop the stall which hasn't been 
forthcoming.  Your answer didn't help much.

John Winters 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Brown <steve_at_brown-web.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Clarification? - shift
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 07:17:20 -0700
Morning John,

I'm claiming they're all lift oriented forward strokes, even with a euro
blade. It's just that the shape of the euro blade delays stall at higher AOA
and provides more lift at AOA beyond stall so they're not as fussy.

Check out these wingtip vortices:
http://www.geocities.com/jefferyjg/wake.html

They are only created (in any size), by wings lifting at high AOA, such as
during takeoff or steep turns.
The little swirl paddler leave behind on either side of their boat (visible
on a calm day) look suspiciously similar except rotated 90 degrees.

By trial and error I learned which stroke gave the best pull with the GL
paddle, same as I learned how to successfully do a sculling brace. After
reading the sea kayaker article I mentioned a few posts ago, I learned the
reason behind it. That article showed clearly how the shape of a euro paddle
or especially a wing paddle helped keep water moving parallel to the blade
face, but that with the Greenland paddle, the paddler had to supply the
motion to do that.

I'm definitely not saying that I was out paddling with my GL and paddle and
suddenly realized my blade was stalling. What I am saying is that through
trial and error I did learn how to generate the most pull (the feedback
mechanism). Once this was learned, it became "automatic" and no longer
required thought. Effectively, I had learned to continuously adjust AOA to
avoid stall (or deep stall) without knowing it. I suppose the degree of
success in doing this is at least one element that determines a person's
forward stoke efficiency.

Trying to explain, or prove how I did that is like trying to explain how I
learned to catch a fly ball (usually). It is evident that I did, but
explaining it with any accuracy would require a million lines of computer
code. The reason for this example is not to imply that effective paddling is
about the eye / hand / leg coordination required for catching a fly ball,
but that the human brain is capable of solving very sophisticated problems
which defy simple explanation or proof.

Anyway, it seems like we are about 1" apart in our positions, but that we
would each wear out our keyboards trying to close that gap - without
success. 

One thing I am wondering, is whether the fussiness of the GL paddle (which
we agree on) is integral to it's easiness on the body, or if it's the small
submerged blade area during a cruising stroke, or both.

I don't know if there are any extreme high aspect ratio paddles out there
with curved asymmetrical blades? If so, it would be interesting to see if
they retain the same benefits on the body for cruising, even though they
would not retain the GL paddles benefits for sculling.

Steve Brown
 

-----Original Message-----
......

My point exactly but without the optimism. Keep in mind that paddlers using 
GP paddles and a drag oriented stroke can, at cruising speeds at least, 
keep up with other GP using paddlers supposedly using lift oriented strokes.

How do you tell what part of the stroke is stall or lift if the resultant 
thrust remains the same or similar?
.....
Most know that GP paddles can stall . I asked if you could prove that you 
could both recognize it during the stroke and make the appropriate 
adjustments to the angle of attack to stop the stall which hasn't been 
forthcoming.  Your answer didn't help much.

John Winters 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Winters <jdwinters_at_eastlink.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Clarification? - shift
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 21:45:19 -0300
Steve wrote;

SNIP

>Anyway, it seems like we are about 1" apart in our positions, but that we
>would each wear out our keyboards trying to close that gap - without
>success.

That sometimes happens.


>One thing I am wondering, is whether the fussiness of the GL paddle (which
>we agree on) is integral to it's easiness on the body, or if it's the small
>submerged blade area during a cruising stroke, or both.

Maybe both. My own experience suggests that one can duplicate the feel of a 
GP paddle using a small area low aspect ratio paddle. Unfortunately, this 
also falls into the opinion category so I would never suggest that it 
actually happens only that it seemd to me that it did.

>I don't know if there are any extreme high aspect ratio paddles out there
>with curved asymmetrical blades? If so, it would be interesting to see if
>they retain the same benefits on the body for cruising, even though they
>would not retain the GL paddles benefits for sculling.

I made one,  tried it and it felt really strange unless I used the sprint 
racer's stroke. Didn't feel all that bad then but it did act strange in 
anything but a forward stroke.

If I had spent mor time with it maybe I would have changed my mind but time 
was in short supply at the time.

Cheers

John Winters
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:39 PDT