John Fereira wrote: > At 05:38 PM 12/20/2004 -0800, Dave Kruger wrote: > >> Flash and dash over substance and content. > > Except for that article on Bracing Drills. Whoever wrote that is really > good. Well...that's perhaps debatable ;), but it certainly wasn't an article designed to appeal to neophytes. If SK really were trying to move towards less hard-core articles, they'd scarely have printed that one. > BTW, I hope that Chris chimes in soon to respond to the criticism. I > know that he subscribes to the list. Several people have accused SK of going where the money is and essentially abandoning us fanatics. This may be a case of the perfect being the enemy of the good. I think SK is the best magazine for sea kayaking out there. Would you rather they focus on articles that appeal only to a small few, lose money, and cut back or fold? In publishing, survival means circulation and advertising. I don't really want to go back to photocopied newsletters. For the record, I think the new format is _graphically_ an improvement, as the old version was really old fashioned. I don't necessarily like it any better, myself. And I'm very far from being a graphics expert. -- Steve Cramer Athens, GAReceived on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 09:00:29 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:18 PDT