At 12:00 PM 12/21/2004 -0500, Steve Cramer wrote: >John Fereira wrote: > >>At 05:38 PM 12/20/2004 -0800, Dave Kruger wrote: >> >>>Flash and dash over substance and content. >>Except for that article on Bracing Drills. Whoever wrote that is really good. > >Well...that's perhaps debatable ;), but it certainly wasn't an article >designed to appeal to neophytes. If SK really were trying to move towards >less hard-core articles, they'd scarely have printed that one. > >>BTW, I hope that Chris chimes in soon to respond to the criticism. I >>know that he subscribes to the list. > >Several people have accused SK of going where the money is and essentially >abandoning us fanatics. This may be a case of the perfect being the enemy >of the good. I think SK is the best magazine for sea kayaking out there. >Would you rather they focus on articles that appeal only to a small few, >lose money, and cut back or fold? In publishing, survival means >circulation and advertising. I don't really want to go back to photocopied >newsletters. It's not just publications. I know of three retail/rental shops for which survival is a real issue. Not only are they not profit mongers getting rich off a mass market of consumers, they're reevaluating whether or not they can stay in business when competing with mall outdoor stores staffed by people that may not have ever paddled a kayak.Received on Tue Dec 21 2004 - 09:24:53 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:18 PDT