PaddleWise by thread

From: Peter Rattenbury <ratten_at_uow.edu.au>
subject: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 07:59:01 +1000
	I am strongly opposed to the moves to make it easier for idiots to gain
access to the VHF frequencies.  I strongly believe that we should all have to
study and sit exams for a VHF licence, as was once the case, at least in
Australia.

	John's recent example of a serious distress call being compromised by idiots
is a case in point.

	Professional mariners must be shaking their heads at the stuff that is
infesting the international calling channels these days. Eventually the VHF
channels are going to be as clogged as the 27meg channels.

	Pete Rattenbury, Wollongong, Australia.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 00:56:51 -0400
On 19 Apr 2005 at 7:59, Peter Rattenbury wrote:

>  I am strongly opposed to the moves to make it easier for idiots to
>  gain
> access to the VHF frequencies.  I strongly believe that we should all
> have to study and sit exams for a VHF licence, as was once the case,
> at least in Australia.

So too with me here in the Great White North.  Unfortunately, the 
attitude that the license is not required (in the sense that you 
won't get caught) is quite common.  Add to that the fact that with 
the US dropping license requirements means that US manufactured power-
and sailboats come with marine VHF transceivers as standard 
equipment.  When those boats are sold in Canada, no one says "you 
need a license for this bit."  Ditto the radio shops - when you buy a 
ham radio rig, you need to show a license but when you buy a marine 
VHF (as I did this past weekend), no one asks for anything.  The ham 
radio enthusiasts are keen on keeping their hobby clean, but there's 
no one stepping up for marine VHF.

>  Professional mariners must be shaking their heads at the stuff that
>  is
> infesting the international calling channels these days. Eventually
> the VHF channels are going to be as clogged as the 27meg channels.

They have at least one thing in their favour - commercial operators 
are required to carry DSC enabled gear.  That means that they get a 
digital emergency transmission out on channel 70 with a registration 
number (ID) and GPS position automatically.  No voice competition 
involved.  The followup is on channel 16, but the main message is out 
already.

If all someone wants is good weather info, buy a weather radio 
receiver.  Both NOAA (US) and Environment Canada broadcast weather 
info on the WX1-WX10 channels and no license is required.  If you 
want to chatter with your kayaking buddies, buy a set of FRS radios - 
no license required for that either.  But if you buy marine VHF, 
respect it for what it is.  As Dave says, don't abuse it.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Erik Sprenne <sprenne_at_netnitco.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:11:04 -0500
Michael Daly wrote:
> If you
> want to chatter with your kayaking buddies,
> buy a set of FRS radios - no license required
> for that either.
>

FWIW, having last year purchased FRS radios, it became apparent that
unless one wants to order from a specialty shop, most radios currently
available in the big box stores are combination FRS/GMRS radios.

Although the advertised longer range of the GMRS is appealing (1-5 watt
transmission power, advertised 2-7 mile range), many consumers probably
don't realize that a license is required for the GMRS radios - and it's
often not stated very conspicuously on the package.  Only pure FRS radios
(max 500 milliwatt power - advertised range up to 2 miles) are exempt
from licensing.
see http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/personal/generalmobile/

Erik Sprenne
at the southern tip of Lake Michigan
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:24:06 -0700
[Moderator's Note: Content unaltered. Excessive quoting (including  
headers/footers/sig lines/extraneous text from previous posts, etc.) 
have been removed. Please edit quoted material in addition to removing 
header/trailers when replying to posts.]

It appears that a GMRS license may be required for the dual (FRS/GMRS)
radios even if you don't use the GMRS functions. You get a cool
callsign and everything. And all for only $75. I'm glad mine are older
FRS-only models.

I wonder if Canada and other countries have anything similar to GMRS
and if there is anything about reciprocal licensing.

By the way, if you have any other US-issued licenses or credentials
(pilot's license, USCG Merchant Marine license, etc.) you might not
want to take a chance and operate a GMRS without a license; if they
catch you they can take ALL your licenses away for one infraction of
any US rule.

Craig Jungers
Royal City, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:43:46 -0400
On 20 Apr 2005 at 7:24, Craig Jungers wrote:

> I wonder if Canada and other countries have anything similar to GMRS
> and if there is anything about reciprocal licensing.

Canada has introduced both FRS and GMRS after a few years lag behind 
the US.  GMRS is also restricted to 2 watts (not 5W) in Canada.  At 
this low power, they are exempt from requiring a license.  Note that 
there were licensed LMR bands in the GMRS frequency range prior to 
the introduction of GMRS - they remain licensed.

I guess they restricted the power so that they would not have to deal 
with licensing issues.  As such, you can't use the US GMRS devices in 
Canada at 5W.  

As such, I see FRS, GMRS and FRS/GMRS units in a lot of stores here.  
Erik mentions that FRS-only units are getting hard to find in the US. 
I find that surprising given that the license is mandatory.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Keith Wrage <keith.wrage_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:49:51 -0500
 From this document: (Canadian study guide for radio licensure)
http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/internet/insmt-gst.nsf/vwapj/ric26.pdf/$FILE/ric26.pdf

On page 7:

Radio Silence Periods
In order to make it possible for distress and urgency calls to be heard 
readily, periods of
silence have been made mandatory on 2 182 kHz in the Maritime Service. 
These periods of
silence commence on the hour until three minutes past the hour, and repeat 
on the half-hour
until thirty-three minutes past the hour. Unless in a distress or urgency 
situation, all
stations fitted with the MF radiotelephone international distress and 
calling frequency of
2 182 kHz must maintain listening watch and radio silence during the 
silence periods.
Stations should increase the level of their 2 182 kHz receiver volume 
controls during these
periods in order to better hear weak distress signals (see the section 
entitled "Distress
Frequency Watch Receiver" in this publication).

Radio silence periods are not required to be maintained on the VHF (Very 
High Frequency)
International Distress and Calling Frequency of 156.8 MHz (Channel 16).

The last line indicates CH 16 is NOT included in radio silence, right?

K
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: alex <al.m_at_3web.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 21:10:57 -0700
> Radio silence periods are not required to be maintained on the VHF (Very
> High Frequency)
> International Distress and Calling Frequency of 156.8 MHz (Channel 16).
>
> The last line indicates CH 16 is NOT included in radio silence, right?


Correct; because it is not a regular calling channnel.  Nobody is supposed
to use it unless in emergency.  But like I said, in Mexico they use CH 16
widely: http://www.thelog.com/printer/article.asp?c=78408 - seems like all
marinas on the list use CH 16 - or I don't undestand what they wanted to say
in this document.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:06:16 -0400
On 19 Apr 2005 at 20:49, Keith Wrage wrote:

> urgency situation, all stations fitted with the MF radiotelephone
> international distress and calling frequency of 2 182 kHz must
> maintain listening watch and radio silence during the silence periods.
[...]
> Radio silence periods are not required to be maintained on the VHF
> (Very High Frequency) International Distress and Calling Frequency of
> 156.8 MHz (Channel 16).
> 
> The last line indicates CH 16 is NOT included in radio silence, right?

Right.  These are two different systems and have two different 
protocols.  The former is a long-range service (in roughly the same 
frequency range as some ham radio bands) that is used in 
international waters.  The latter operates over shorter distances in 
territorial waters.  Unless you're in the same league as Lindemann or 
other ocean crossers, you're not going to use the MF radio.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] correct radio procedure
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:43:45 -0400
On 20 Apr 2005 at 3:06, Michael Daly wrote:

> The former is a long-range service (in roughly the same
> frequency range as some ham radio bands)

I managed a "duh" moment here.  The MF _frequency_ is roughly 2MHz, 
the ham bands are around 2 meter _wavelength_.   Sorry for the mixup.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:41 PDT