Nick wrote: > My responses on this have largely been pushed by advertising hype I read > and conversations I hear. It is quite common to hear something to effect > of "With it's AAAA chine this boat has XXXX stability." or "I paddled X > hard chine boat and Y soft chine boat and the soft chine boat was much > more ZZZZ". My goal is for people to take these broad sweeping statements > with a grain of salt. They usually completely ignore important design > characteristics that are much more important. Nick is dead on here. When I first got into designing canoes and kayaks one would hear tons of nonsense. I am not sure it is better now despite the efforts of some designers. We still have salespeople who make extravagant and unsupported clams about boats. I suppose it reveals the triumph of ignorance and superstition over science. :-) Fortunately, here on Paddlewise we are smarter than the average paddler (well, we try) and can deal with the straight goods without sugar coating. Some of the discussions here have been highly educational. Some of you will recall such topics as whether paddles moved or not, the effectiveness of paddle shapes, the sponson issue (I think we can spell it out now :-) ), to rudder or not to rudder, etc. etc. All good stuff. Cheers John Winters *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon May 16 2005 - 14:16:32 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:20 PDT