Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?

From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:53:37 EDT
Nick,
 
A one piece paddle is a relic! Right up there with my grandpappy's  
muzzleloader over the mantle. ; )
 
Actually, I agree with you that a one piece is a very strong paddle and  once 
a blade design is found that suits ones primary uses, it will arguably last  
longer than a take apart. I thought the Lendal crank was interesting so I  
bought it. I bought the Lendal 4 piece with nylon carbon blades and a full 5 cm  
shorter than my other EP's. I wanted a good rock garden and sea boat surfing  
paddle and chose the Nordkapp blades. A 4 piece paddle such as Lendal's are 
well  made. I need a 4 piece because I fly with paddles at least twice a year. 
The  joint you use an allen wrench on is replaceable.  I had an Aquabound 4  
piece WW paddle that sat under my WW boats float bags as a spare. Before I  
destroyed it, it's joints were loosening up and I was not all that high on it  
after a while.
 
A 2 piece paddle is subject to greater potential damage than a 4 piece in  
the airline's hands. I do not want to start a trip with a hastily purchased  
aluminum Carlysle on my deck and my spare as a primary. I also do not want to  
deal with all the packaging at my destination that protects my equipment.
 
Aside from Lendal's nice blade designs, their interchangability is key.  
Werner's blades are just as good, but AFAIK not interchangeable. My second crank  
purchase was a 210cm (I know, I know, a slave to fashion) with the kinetic  
blades. I do switch them around a bit. I like the Nordkapp blades for their bite 
 and I like the 210cm length. I switched things around and it was my primary 
for  a trip I took a couple months ago where we launched and landed in surf 
every  day. I normally use the kinetic blade with the 210 length, otherwise.
 
Last year I actually broke a tube doing something oafish and when I got  home 
it was a $57 replacement section and not another broken paddle going up on  
the wall.
 
I prefer a 210 now to a 215 so length and feather variability don't matter  
so much to me. However, my buddy bought that feature, for an extra $25 bucks,  
and the 5 cm variability was better for him when the kayak he was in was 3.5  
inches wider and had more freeboard than his home boat.
 
There are 2 issues with the Lendal. You have to shoot freshwater on the  
joint to keep it clean. That's not as maintenance free as a 1 piece. The second  
issue is, *where'd I put that damn key*. I have it lashed permanently in a pfd  
pocket, now.
 
I'm actually surprised you are not making a woodstrip version of your own  
wing blade design. When you turn one of your boats into a sectional and paddle  
someplace you've always wanted to paddle you may find it easier to leave the 
one  piece behind and bring along a 4 piece. 
 
Cheers,
 
Rob G
 
In a message dated 5/19/2005 5:58:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com writes:

The  people I paddle with are all talking about getting the latest 4- 
piece  paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable blades. I can  
understand  the use of a take-apart for an on-deck spare or if you  
have a tiny  little car and can't carry a 1-piece, but 4-piece???

The other big  thing in paddles these days is an adjustable ferrule  
that lets you  change the length or feather.

What is the appeal of these things? Do  people really swap out blades  
all the time? Are they really changing  the length and feather? I can  
understand if you are a new paddler  and don't know what you like, but  
are these features really useful  for an experienced paddler?

I personally make my own paddles, but have  always felt that a 1-piece  
will be lighter and stronger as well as  being immune to jamming and  
loosening. But it is almost impossible  to find a 1-piece paddle  
intended for sea kayaks these days. Stores  don't stock them and  
catalogs don't list them. They are typically a  special order item.  I  
did special order a wing paddle  recently. I got a 1-piece with  
heavier glass blades. It was much  cheaper than the full carbon take- 
apart and only barely heavier.  One-piece paddles are still easily  
available for  whitewater.

My first impression is that manufacturers and dealers are  just trying  
to save oversized shipping charges, or maybe it is a way  to giving  
the appearance of higher value to support higher retail  prices. The  
replaceable blade system is probably a good way to sell  more blades  
as people lose or break one and have to buy two to  replace it.

Why are people buying these things and why can't you find a  good 1- 
piece any more?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu May 19 2005 - 07:53:59 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:20 PDT