Peter said (snip): >>"...Andrew's ...choice of using a reasonably ordinary kayak... As a >>general rule, your typical sea kayak isn't designed for long crossings"<< >At some point, the style in which the trip is attempted is important. What >would be the point in crossing the Tasman in a 40' yacht? On the other >hand, swimming across is likely too hard. So if you decide to use a sea >kayak, how much modification of the kayak is OK before the trip is not >worthwhile? Is a Peter Bray / Atlantic trip a sea kayak trip?< Those are all very good questions Peter. I guess yatchs do sink from time to time; not very often. Those who cross rough-known seas in specialized ocean row boats for that matter, sometimes come to grief - most make it obviously. Swimmers have pushed boundaries with every new year that passes. But Andrew was a kayaker. So the point is a bit mute. Peter Bray is a kayaker too, I remind myself. And some kayak paddlers are successful taking the challenge of a long, seemingly endless crossing in Kleppers, while others have proven that overnighting in a single-occupancy, double fiberglass kayak can be done for a long ocean crossing. I can't ansewer the question of when the modifications or the type of kayaked vessel used - or the level employed of modificational ingenuity toward a traditional styled kayak - might impeed the purity of the crossing in any objective reasoning. Nor can I make an objective comment about the use of specialized, factory-built kayaks made for long crossings. >I am sure Andrew felt that the trip had to count as a sea kayak crossing, >and only allowed himself certain modifications and additions.< While it had to be arbitrary, yes, there must have been a point where he felt the trip was still being undertaken in a vessel ordinary paddlers could relate to, but modified enough to be pragmatic. I heard he had a factory-stretched Mirage, along with his capsule addition. Nobody would take away the fact that Andrew had attempted something hitherto unheard of in a reasonably normal sea kayak. >But there is a real division. Anyone taking great risk like Andrew, with >whatever skill and preparation, is still going to need a good dose of luck. >If "stuff happens", did the adventurer understand the magnitude of the >impending disaster before taking on the risk? Does anyone really have an >idea of what they are doing when playing with their own life?< I meant no criticism or judgment in Andrew's case regarding equipment choice. Nor was I attempting to disseminate the issue of individual acceptable risk level - or even the bigger question of a particular paddler's struggle to wrestle out of the water with objectivity, that part of the equation. I do personally think only an idiot wouldn't have thought through some of the ramifications. That's a category most paddlers of Andrew's caliber don't fit. In the end, one's skill, their equipment, and the anticipated conditions are all significant co-factors directly related to a successful outcome. Good luck will always play some roll when dealing with a capricious, dangerous environment during longer exposure especially. Sleeping in a kayak, dealing with day-to-day needs in that same kayak - one not specifically designed for that purpose (though modified to accommodate that activity) - is an added variable. I was merely suggesting the "luck" factor appears to have to increase for a successful crossing the more that vessel becomes less specialized. It's just my own opinion and was a simple statement of what I believe to be fact. I do remain regretful that you and your countrymen lost such a remarkable man like Andrew. Doug Lloyd Victoria BC *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sun Mar 25 2007 - 15:06:52 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:23 PDT