PaddleWise by thread

From: Matt Broze <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: FW: Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 02:17:06 -0700
Bradford wrote:

>>>>>>>As many of you already know, the tidal shorelines in Washington are
private property, all the way to the water's edge. Makes it difficult to get
out of your kayak.<<<<<<<

This is not correct for many if not most of the beaches of WA. And where
Bradford is correct, it is usually the average high tide line (approximately
the log line) that is the border between public beach and private property.
So the public beach is legally available to kayakers for landing most of the
time except high tide. In fact, I think most of the beaches below the high
tide line are public in WA. The Dept. of Natural Resources has some booklets
for the San Juan Islands (and also a map of the islands) and the Straits of
Juan de Fuca (and maybe more) that show which beaches fall into which
category and even with arial photos of where the boundries between the
various "jurisdictions" or "types of ownership" are. I think the title (or
subtitle) of the booklets was "Your Public Beaches".

Of course, the upland property owners often believe (or pretend to believe)
that they also own the beach. This (and the need for shoreline toilet
facilities) has caused kayakers to be seen as undesirable vermin in the San
Juan Islands. As a result residents have done what they can to reduce the
number of put-ins available for kayakers in those islands whenever they
could. They have been quite successful in that endeavor. Most of the
traditional put-ins near ferry docks that were available in the 1980's have
been eliminated so paddlers need to drive on the ferries rather than just
wheel their boats on them (as we used to do) in order to get on the water
from all the islands except San Juan Island. On San Juan Island (the last
time I tried anyhow) one needed to wheel ones kayak a few blocks to a marina
to launch. This has been quite a disappointing experience for me When I
started paddling most residents considered the few kayakers as interesting
visitors. This probably has some parallels with the European invasion of
Norht America and the changing attitude of the Natives as numbers of
Europeans increased and began abusing the land and competing for resourses.
I recently saw a great poster of famous picture of Geronimo with a grim
expression on his face and a rifle under the caption "Fighting Terrorism
since 1492".

Matt Broze
www.marinerkayaks.com  
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kork4_at_cluemail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:48:28 -0400
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 02:17:06 -0700, "Matt Broze" <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
said:

> This is not correct for many if not most of the beaches of WA. And where
> Bradford is correct, it is usually the average high tide line
> (approximately the log line) that is the border between public beach and private
> property. So the public beach is legally available to kayakers for landing most of
> the time except high tide. 

Public access and property laws vary across the united states.  In
Massachusetts the property owners own to the LOW tide line.  You can
only legally walk the beach if you have a fishing rod - a fine
antiquated law.  From what I've heard Colorado has the worst access laws
in the US.  The property owner owns the stream beds and the air above
the water - this is my recollection and far from definitive.

> As a result residents have done what they can to reduce the
> number of put-ins available for kayakers in those islands whenever they
> could. They have been quite successful in that endeavor.

Access definitely varies by town.  In Orleans Massachusetts (on cape
cod) there are 37 public landings, which I find phenomenal for a single
town.  30+ town landings has the advantage of distributing the load so
no one area is overwhelmed.  I haven't the slightest idea how Orleans
came to have so many public landings, having that many launch sites is
wonderful.

Kirk
-- 
  Kirk Olsen
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bradford_Crain <crainb_at_pdx.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: FW: Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:00:00 -0700
       I won't try to refute or agree with what Matt said, since I have 
never researched
  this topic and do not live in Washington. But I will relate an incident 
when a group
  of us form the Portland, Oregon area were paddling near Boston Harbor in 
Puget
  Sound, and were getting pounded by some nasty opposing tidal flows, 
surges, and wind.
  Our group was of mixed abilities, and we sought refuge on a nearby beach.
  Upon landing, a person came running down to the water's edge, yelling and
  screaming, demanding that we re-enter the maelstrom immediately and die. I 
will never
  forget that day.

BRC

> Bradford wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>As many of you already know, the tidal shorelines in Washington are
> private property, all the way to the water's edge. Makes it difficult to 
> get
> out of your kayak.<<<<<<<
>
> This is not correct for many if not most of the beaches of WA. And where
> Bradford is correct, it is usually the average high tide line 
> (approximately
> the log line) that is the border between public beach and private 
> property.
> So the public beach is legally available to kayakers for landing most of 
> the
> time except high tide. In fact, I think most of the beaches below the high
> tide line are public in WA. The Dept. of Natural Resources has some 
> booklets
> for the San Juan Islands (and also a map of the islands) and the Straits 
> of
> Juan de Fuca (and maybe more) that show which beaches fall into which
> category and even with arial photos of where the boundries between the
> various "jurisdictions" or "types of ownership" are. I think the title (or
> subtitle) of the booklets was "Your Public Beaches".
>
> Of course, the upland property owners often believe (or pretend to 
> believe)
> that they also own the beach. This (and the need for shoreline toilet
> facilities) has caused kayakers to be seen as undesirable vermin in the 
> San
> Juan Islands. As a result residents have done what they can to reduce the
> number of put-ins available for kayakers in those islands whenever they
> could. They have been quite successful in that endeavor. Most of the
> traditional put-ins near ferry docks that were available in the 1980's 
> have
> been eliminated so paddlers need to drive on the ferries rather than just
> wheel their boats on them (as we used to do) in order to get on the water
> from all the islands except San Juan Island. On San Juan Island (the last
> time I tried anyhow) one needed to wheel ones kayak a few blocks to a 
> marina
> to launch. This has been quite a disappointing experience for me When I
> started paddling most residents considered the few kayakers as interesting
> visitors. This probably has some parallels with the European invasion of
> Norht America and the changing attitude of the Natives as numbers of
> Europeans increased and began abusing the land and competing for 
> resourses.
> I recently saw a great poster of famous picture of Geronimo with a grim
> expression on his face and a rifle under the caption "Fighting Terrorism
> since 1492".
>
> Matt Broze
> www.marinerkayaks.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Matt Broze <marinerkayaks_at_msn.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: FW: Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 05:49:39 -0700
So what happened? Even if it was private land I think that the "Any port in
a storm" ethic should have applied in your case.

Matt Broze
www.marinerkayaks.com  

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford_Crain [mailto:crainb_at_pdx.edu] 

       I won't try to refute or agree with what Matt said, since I have 
never researched
  this topic and do not live in Washington. But I will relate an incident 
when a group
  of us form the Portland, Oregon area were paddling near Boston Harbor in 
Puget
  Sound, and were getting pounded by some nasty opposing tidal flows, 
surges, and wind.
  Our group was of mixed abilities, and we sought refuge on a nearby beach.
  Upon landing, a person came running down to the water's edge, yelling and
  screaming, demanding that we re-enter the maelstrom immediately and die. I

will never
  forget that day.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Mark Sanders <sandmarks_at_ca.rr.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] FW: FW: Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 19:14:06 -0700
Clearly, he must have percieved you to be one of those terrorists.

6/3  19:15
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net
> [mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_paddlewise.net]On Behalf Of Bradford_Crain

>   Upon landing, a person came running down to the water's edge,
> yelling and
>   screaming, demanding that we re-enter the maelstrom immediately
> and die. I
> will never
>   forget that day.
>
> BRC
> -----Original Message-----

> > I recently saw a great poster of famous picture of Geronimo with a grim
> > expression on his face and a rifle under the caption "Fighting Terrorism
> > since 1492".
> >
> > Matt Broze
> > www.marinerkayaks.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] FW: FW: Envisioning the Future of Coastal Management
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:51:16 -0400
On 6/1/07, Bradford_Crain <crainb_at_pdx.edu> wrote:
>
>
>   Our group was of mixed abilities, and we sought refuge on a nearby
> beach.
>   Upon landing, a person came running down to the water's edge, yelling
> and
>   screaming, demanding that we re-enter the maelstrom immediately and die.
> I
>   will never forget that day.
>
>
My standard reply in situations like this is to demand that they go ahead
and "call a cop". Most police officers have no clue about land use laws but
they can recognize a dangerous situation. It's much easier to reason with
cop than a storm front.

Many landowners either assume that they own all the land they can see or
they assume you don't know anyway. My next door neighbor has decided that a
stake marking the "meander line" of the lake is his corner marker and is
trying to say that we are on 20 feet of his property. I just smile at him.
I've looked at the plat maps (one of my clients is a land survey and
engineering firm) and I'm comfortable but every now and then I see him with
a tape measure in his hand clambering over the fence to double check what he
thinks are the measurements of his lot.

When I actually did surveys for a living many years ago (as a youth) I
watched landowners come down and move offsets for a right-of-way because
they "know" that isn't the edge of their land. (Offsets are placed 10 or 20
feet away from a surveyed point so surveyors can go back in and find it
after the point has been destroyed by equipment without resurveying the
entire line.)

The San Juan Islands are interesting in that about 80% of all the shoreline
homes are empty and 30% of thsoe are for sale at any given time. The chances
of anyone noticing your landing are, I suspect, very remote in that
particulare area.


Craig Jungers
Royal City, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:44 PDT