On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Doug Lloyd <douglloyd_at_shaw.ca> wrote: > Hey kayakers, > > Do folks prefer _short, concise_ safety articles outlining an incident > (either first or second hand) followed by a writer's economy of commentary, > or more in-depth, "turn over every stone" analysis (provided it is strictly > content related, of course)? > I think that, for me, it depends upon the incident. Some are more complicated than others. Almost all of them result from a combination of errors and would never have happened had the chain been broken at some point along the line. Lots are simply complacency whether by naivete or over-confidence. If the incident is complicated then I like to get all the info. Craig *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 18:42:22 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:29 PDT