Doug asked: > Do folks prefer _short, concise_ safety articles outlining an incident > (either first or second hand) followed by a writer's economy of > commentary, > or more in-depth, "turn over every stone" analysis (provided it is > strictly > content related, of course)? > > Do kayakers generally like to read permutations of multiple safety > equipment/hard skill recommendations, or an emphasis on seamanship and > navigational imperatives? Doug, I prefer an in-depth analysis rather than a short, concise story. There are usually a number of different options that can be tried with possibly different options. It would be nice to read about them. When things go sour, it is usually not one thing, but a combination that provides all of the drama and/or tragedy. Our responses should also be a combination of things and IMHO, they should get spelled out. Just my 2 cents-----oops, I guess that should now be a quarter based on the strength of the US dollar. Steve Holtzman Southern California __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3084 (20080508) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 18:46:20 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:29 PDT