Pam and I thought that, given the nature of Paddlewise to digest safety incidents and because there are so many well-qualified paddlers on the list, we should put this out for discussion. There is something to learn from it, I think. The Seattle/Tacoma area remains ice free all year around (except for some harbors and marinas) and boating can be done at any time. In fact, we used to go to a nice cove every December 31st and spend New Year's Eve in a quiet anchorage around a warm heater. Close to the heater, as I recall. Anyway, despite this factoid the area has an official "opening day" of the boating season which falls some time around the first of May. They have boat parades and everything. Then they all motor to the same slip they keep their boats in year around. Don't ask. This incident involves currents around an area (Point Defiance) near the Tacoma Narrows. Most of you have heard of the Tacoma Narrows and the bridge that thrashed itself to death there. Well Point Defiance juts out into the current stream north of Tacoma and offers some eddy protection either north or south of the point; depending upon which way the current is flowing. The entire point is a park operated by the City of Tacoma (with a zoo and everything) where kayaks are rented and both canoes and kayaks are commonly launched. Water temperatures in the area range from the low 40s (F) in to the low 50s (F) depending upon the season and the current flow. Currents in the Narrows itself can reach 7kts and tables show current speeds commonly reach 4kts north of the Narrows. The weekend of May 5th was the first nice weekend of the "boating season" and several Puget Sound paddlers were taking rescue lessons at the beach right next to the point (south) when they watched a canoe with two people float around the Point and past on the flood and then turn into the eddy south of the Point to paddle back to their launch site. But the way the Point lays to the current the eddy ends with a strong eddy-line which has to be crossed; at which time you're in the full flow of the current and have to paddle at 4kts (or more) to get around the point itself. As the canoe approached the eddy line one of the rescue students on shore, a USCG officer, got his VHF ready to call for help should the people in the canoe overturn and end up in the water. Reports indicated that as the canoe crossed the eddy line into the main current they were hit by a large boat wake and the occupants were thrown into the water wearing only street clothing. The USCG officer involved in the paddling class immediately keyed his VHF and put out a Mayday for help. Three of the rescue instructors were already on the water in their kayaks and headed right out to the swimmers. The rest of the class also piled into their kayaks and likewise headed to the swimmers. The USCG officer remained on shore with his radio. The co-instructors got to the swimmers and the canoe, emptied the canoe of water and then braced it so that the swimmers could re-enter their boat. Then the 3 co-instructors took the canoe in tow with one left to steady the canoe as they towed it and its occupants to shore. When the students arrive they take up positions nearby. One approached the canoe and asked the occupants questions designed to determine their mental state. He reported that they had been in the water about 5 minutes and didn't seem impaired but might have been slightly disoriented. Three boats arrived before the canoe got to the shoreline; two USCG boats and one patrol boat from Tacoma Police Department but by this time the canoe and its occupants were almost ashore but the two former swimmers opt to clamber into one of the USCG boats. The female says "thanks" to the kayakers and the male also says "thanks" but they claim that they could have swam to shore unassisted. The implication (or maybe just my inference) is that the male swimmer might have been somewhat irked. Shortly after that incident a rental SOT kayak with a guy and girl (dressed in street attire) managed to get into the main flood current and decided, after about five minutes, that they weren't going to get around the Point and managed to get to the beach. The girl was apparently not a happy camper and the guy was embarassed. The students at the rescue practice towed their kayak around the Point for them while the guy and girl trudged back to return their rental kayak. This seems somewhat straightforward but there has been some Monday-morning quarterbacking (now *there* is a surprise) around the first (canoe) incident. 1. Several people felt that calling Mayday when two swimmers were in the water only a short distance from shore was unnecessary since the swimmers were not really at risk with 4 instructors and several experienced kayakers as students close by. The actual distance wasn't mentioned but I estimate it at less than 50 feet. Others felt that since it was a USCG officer (off duty) who made the call then everyone else should shut up. Or words to that effect. 2. I tend to think that launching 7 or 8 kayakers to rescue two swimmers less than 50 feet from shore was overkill. The three co-instructors obviously had all the skills needed to cope with the situation (and did) and the rest of the class should have either stayed on the beach or, at most, stayed well clear. Too many cooks, etc. 3. There were several remarks about the kayak rental place not requiring customers to be dressed for immersion; especially given the dangerous nature of the area with strong currents and associated eddy lines and the cold water. 4. Someone had remarked that their use of a cell phone to call 911 during a previous incident at that same location had resulted in a 30 minute wait for assistance. The USCG and Tacoma PD boats were there lots faster than that and indicates that, at elast in a well populated area, a VHF call on channel 16 is effective in getting help. 5. The two canoists seemed somewhat angry that they were "rescued" from a situation in which they could have easily swam to shore. One of the students thought that, given the water temperature and the speed of the current, they didn't know how close they came to death. 6. Boat wakes from large power vessels can be, in my opinion, worse than the currents and wave trains one finds around Puget Sound. If there is one good thing to be said about high gasoline prices, it's that maybe there won't be quite so many 40-foot (and over) boats trying to get a semi-displacement hull up onto a plane with sheer horsepower. Ok... maybe this isn't a discussion point but it's one of my pet peeves. I might add as an afterthought that a few years ago, while paddling near the University of Washington I witnessed a power boat, apparently driven by people involved with the UW canoe rental program, swamp a canoe with two girls aboard about 200 yards off the rental docks. The power boat was running off-plane but fast and leaving a large wake which tipped the girls over. I sat by and watched these twits spend 25 minutes (with the girls in the water) trying to get the canoe up onto their boat and empty it. The water temp was in the 70s so no one was in danger and I eventually got bored and paddled away. The last I saw they were still trying to get the canoe empty. The stupidity of people who can just turn a key and drive a boat away from a dock should never be underestimated. Any comments? Craig Jungers Moses Lake, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Mon May 12 2008 - 14:33:25 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:29 PDT