Re: [Paddlewise] Winter in a time of Climate Change

From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:00:22 -0800
The problem with science is that it doesn't pay much attention to politics.
If the earth is round, then it's round. No amount of public relations is
going to change that; although public relations can change the way people
think. Nevertheless, 99% of the people can believe the earth is flat but if
it's really round then it's round and that's that.

Unfortunately, for some reason the "climate change" issue has become
politicized with sides chosen up and weapons drawn. The political fight has
no bearing on whether or not man actually has made climate change worse. If
we have and don't change anything then we face some serious problems. If we
haven't and do change then nothing bad happens.

The debate has been exacerbated because there is no "proof" that humans have
had any part in climate change. People with a background in science
understand that there is precious little "proof" in anything scientific.
This, combined with the egos involved, often make non-scientists think that
the "eggheads" really have no idea what they are talking about. But as
Kruger mentions, most people with a background in science have come around
to the idea that, at the very least, humans are not helping. And if the data
are correct, we are a significant factor.

Do humans have some negative role to play in climate change? That seems
obvious. It's like the question, "Does smoking kill you?" Some think it does
and others think it doesn't. But no one thinks it's good for you.

The natural cycles of climate change are the background noise in the debate.
No one can deny that the earth has gone through many of these and perhaps
we're going through a natural one now. But chemically speaking the junk we
are putting into the environment cannot be doing anything but exacerbating
the problem. So far all of the physical evidence (ice cores, etc.) indicate
that this is an extremely serious situation. If your boat is sinking arguing
about whose fault it is doesn't make a lot of sense. Pick something up and
start bailing.

As for driving thousands of miles to kayak... there is no doubt that this is
not free from a significant carbon footprint. But it's not as significant as
driving a motorhome thousands of miles for a vacation piloting a 4wheel
Polaris around on the sand dunes. Driving to kayak - even in a kayak that is
fiberglass - is still less of an imprint than driving to Disneyland.

It's good that people are thinking about this issue. No one is without
imperfection but one can hope most can at least discern that there is a
problem.


Craig Jungers
Moses Lake, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Tue Dec 16 2008 - 12:01:19 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:31 PDT