The problem with science is that it doesn't pay much attention to politics. If the earth is round, then it's round. No amount of public relations is going to change that; although public relations can change the way people think. Nevertheless, 99% of the people can believe the earth is flat but if it's really round then it's round and that's that. Unfortunately, for some reason the "climate change" issue has become politicized with sides chosen up and weapons drawn. The political fight has no bearing on whether or not man actually has made climate change worse. If we have and don't change anything then we face some serious problems. If we haven't and do change then nothing bad happens. The debate has been exacerbated because there is no "proof" that humans have had any part in climate change. People with a background in science understand that there is precious little "proof" in anything scientific. This, combined with the egos involved, often make non-scientists think that the "eggheads" really have no idea what they are talking about. But as Kruger mentions, most people with a background in science have come around to the idea that, at the very least, humans are not helping. And if the data are correct, we are a significant factor. Do humans have some negative role to play in climate change? That seems obvious. It's like the question, "Does smoking kill you?" Some think it does and others think it doesn't. But no one thinks it's good for you. The natural cycles of climate change are the background noise in the debate. No one can deny that the earth has gone through many of these and perhaps we're going through a natural one now. But chemically speaking the junk we are putting into the environment cannot be doing anything but exacerbating the problem. So far all of the physical evidence (ice cores, etc.) indicate that this is an extremely serious situation. If your boat is sinking arguing about whose fault it is doesn't make a lot of sense. Pick something up and start bailing. As for driving thousands of miles to kayak... there is no doubt that this is not free from a significant carbon footprint. But it's not as significant as driving a motorhome thousands of miles for a vacation piloting a 4wheel Polaris around on the sand dunes. Driving to kayak - even in a kayak that is fiberglass - is still less of an imprint than driving to Disneyland. It's good that people are thinking about this issue. No one is without imperfection but one can hope most can at least discern that there is a problem. Craig Jungers Moses Lake, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Dec 16 2008 - 12:01:19 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:31 PDT