Re: [Paddlewise] Hart: Open beaches ruling may sink high court careers - Houston Chronicle

From: Elias Ross <genman_at_noderunner.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:10:20 -0700
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Robert Livingston
<bearboat2_at_comcast.net> wrote:

> I have PDF copies of the three brochures
>
> I will be putting them on my Web site in the next few weeks.

Much appreciated. It would be great if somebody could put together a
comprehensive guide to this information.

I came across this interesting article from Google about a book called
"Getting to the Water's Edge" regarding public land access on Whidbey
Island: http://www.whidbeyexaminer.com/main.asp?SectionID=1&SubSectionID=1&ArticleID=1538&TM=47735.5

Here's an interesting excerpt:

"Another issue that has yet to have its day in court is the issue of
walking across private tidelands, Island County Planning Director Jeff
Tate said. The issue is whether property owners can legally keep
people from crossing private tidelands to reach public tidelands.
According to public trust doctrine, the answer is no, Tate said."

"However, the doctrine is an interpretation of state law and has yet
to be challenged in court."

This is also discussed here:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/sma/laws_rules/public_trust.html

"The Public Trust Doctrine does not allow the public to trespass over
privately owned uplands to access the tidelands. It does, however,
protect public use of navigable water bodies below the ordinary high
water mark."

Another paper makes this argument that you can walk on private land.
"ENJOYS LONG WALKS ON THE BEACH: WASHINGTONS PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE
AND THE RIGHT OF PEDESTRIAN PASSAGE OVER PRIVATE TIDELANDS"

From: http://digital.law.washington.edu/dspace-law/bitstream/handle/1773.1/280/81washlrev813.pdf

(Conclusion)
"Although the Supreme Court of Washington has yet to squarely address
a right of public pedestrian passage over private tidelands, the
Washington public trust doctrine logically encompasses such a right,
at least where necessary to effectuate those water-based activities
already judicially recognized as protected by the jus publicum."

My thoughts: Although walking may be allowed, what's not clear is
anything besides walking is allowed. Say sitting, picnicking or
throwing a Frisbee? Or if you were walking from public beach to public
beach over private tidelands but you could just as easily access your
destination another way, say by road. Or in the case of kayakers, why
shouldn't you be able to rest on a private beach on your way to your
destination?

Such matters would likely only be concluded by the legal process. But
who is inclined to spend their time (and money) fighting for these
rights?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
Received on Thu Apr 19 2012 - 15:10:27 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:46 PDT