PaddleWise by thread

From: Steven Holtzman <waterdoc_at_earthlink.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Storm Whistle vs. Fox 40
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 1999 13:14:50 -0800
Dan,

Ok, now that the testing is in--which whistle do you think is better to
carry? I'm not looking for the legal waiver etc. cr_p--just your
opinion.
There's only so much room left on my pfd.

Steve Holtzman
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Bluecanoe2_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Storm Whistle vs. Fox 40
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 17:59:40 EST
In a message dated 11/6/1999 3:27:31 PM Central Standard Time, 
waterdoc_at_earthlink.net writes:

<< Ok, now that the testing is in--which whistle do you think is better to
 carry? I'm not looking for the legal waiver etc. cr_p--just your
 opinion.
 There's only so much room left on my pfd.
  >>


That is why I said the Storm is overated.  It is a big, bulky, easily broken 
piece of plastic and not any louder than smaller ones.

In MHO, one is better off with something bombproof like the Fox orAcme 
Thunderer that will be there after years of smashing it on decks, truck 
tailgates, etc, etc.

To think that a whistle will attract attention of a passing boat, stick your 
head inside the wheel house of a twin diesel vessel and tell me that again.

The two best signaling devises bar none are a mirror and the knowledge of how 
to use is and a STRONG flashlight ie one of the Pelican lights or  similaar 
ones.

Light travels much farther than sound in extinuating circumstances.

My whistle is tethered on a nylon cord and resides in my upper left pocket on 
my PFD along with an acrylic signal mirror.  A three C cell Pelican light is 
in the lower right pocket.  It has the tightest, most piercing beam of light 
short of a laser. Always, daylight or dark.

Other times when appropriate I carry more efficient electronic communications 
devises like a cell phone and/or VHF-FM marine radio.  So many of the places 
I go are not in range for cell or VHF.


      John LeBlanc
            O           
     (____/_______)
~~~~~~/~~~~~~~~~
Bluecanoe2_at_aol.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Storm Whistle vs. Fox 40
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 12:48:51 -0800
Dan Hagen wrote:
>Neither whistle has quite the range of an air horn, but when within
>range both whistles are very noticeable due to their high pitches. At
>most distances they are actually more noticable than the air horn that I
>tested. 
>
>Quite frankly I am surprised by how well these whistles work. I have
>always carried an air horn, and was skeptical about the efficacy of
>these wimpy little whistles, but that was before I tested them. 

My comments from using audiable signal devices at sea, last twenty years:

1. I've been told that the Canadian Coast Guard require a whistles to
produce 115 decibels in order for it to be compliant with regulations. Does
your pea less whistle measure up when you are in Canadian waters? And just
how do the authorities determine decibel levels: at one meter, ten, or what?

2. Tether your whistle (or air horn) against loss.

3. I've experienced the use of double-barrel whistles in gale fore
conditions on open water, and they do work at a good range above the
background noise of waves. The wind is the problem. At high wind speeds, if
your face is straight on to the wind, nature produces its own whistling
effect past the listeners ears, thereby negating your ability to hear. Your
paddling companions should be instructed to turn one ear to lee from time
to time, so as to permit hearing someone whistling for help behind you.

4. After the age of 50ish, hearing loss may occur at the high pitched
frequencies. On group paddles with our club, we bring along air horns which
are better heard by the graying crowd.

5. As far as setting up predetermined whistle signals, forget it. It just
gets too difficult, in my opinion and experience, and to confusing. Real
life use of whistles on the high seas has left an indelible impression with
me that there is only one universal signal that a whistle blast represents
: "SLOW DOWN YOU JERK, YOU ARE WAY TOO FAR AHEAD OF THE REST OF US !" Of
course, I will not tell fellow Paddlewisers whether I've been on the giving
or receiving end of that signal!

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd 	
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dan Hagen <dan_at_hagen.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Storm Whistle vs. Fox 40
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 1999 21:49:31 -0800
Steven Holtzman wrote:
 
> Dan,
> Ok, now that the testing is in--which whistle do you think is better to
> carry? I'm not looking for the legal waiver etc. cr_p--just your
> opinion.
> There's only so much room left on my pfd.

I am leaning towards the Fox 40 because of its tiny size, but I still
have some tests to run, including the obvious high-wind test. But I
doubt that any of the alternatives work well in high winds--my air horn
certainly does not. 

As I noted before, I will continue to carry my air horn in bear country.
I've seen a brown bear run so fast from the sudden blast of my air horn
that I felt sorry for the poor thing--all of those trees that it knocked
down must have hurt! I would have felt worse were it not for the fact
that the bear was only about 15 feet from me when I first noticed it.
Can you say "adrenaline rush"?

Given Doug Lloyd's point about the difficulty that some "elderly"
paddlers have hearing high frequencies, perhaps I will also carry the
air horn when paddling with the geriatric set. :-)

Dan Hagen
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:05 PDT