PaddleWise by thread

From: PJ Rattenbury <ratten_at_uow.edu.au>
subject: [Paddlewise] Standard v Raytheon VHFs
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:50:40 +1000
	Hi Paddlewisers, from downunder....  I am intrigued by the good press
about the Standard handheld on PaddleWise.   Is there anyone on the list
who has used or owns the Raytheons?
	I ask the question because for the first time, to my knowledge, we have a
choice in 'water resistant' VHF handhelds, with Raytheon launching one of
their  models on the Australian, and I presume, the New Zealand market.
Until this month the ICOM was the only 'waterproof' HH on the market here. 
	Which leads me to the question.  Are there any Americans on the list who
can put a word in for the Raytheons?   On the face of it, the company has
the pedigree for quality gear [ just consider their defence contracts!] 
	I note Raytheon's 100 model is CFR 46, and the 106 is JR-7 which are the
two 'water resistant' standards in vogue. 
	BTW I have no commercial tie with either company,  but would be interested
in any user comments about the Raytheons.   
	Paddle on.....
	peterR

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: ralph diaz <rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Standard v Raytheon VHFs
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 21:28:13 -0700
Peter,

The Raytheon 102 and 106 are definitely waterproof.  We have a number of
the former that were donated to the Downtown Boathouse where they get
abused, i.e. no waterproof bag, no particular care beyond recharging. 
They are holding up well.  Other users of the previous Apelco 520 (which
Raytheon replaced, revamped and renamed the Raytheon 102) report no
water damage either.  All of this is with the Nicad pack; no alkaline
pack will be waterproof.

The 106 differs from the 102 in two respects.  It can broadcast at 6
watts and has a longer life battery.  The longer life battery can be
used on the 102.

ralph


> can put a word in for the Raytheons?   On the face of it, the company has
> the pedigree for quality gear [ just consider their defence contracts!]
>         I note Raytheon's 100 model is CFR 46, and the 106 is JR-7 which are the
> two 'water resistant' standards in vogue.
>         BTW I have no commercial tie with either company,  but would be interested
> in any user comments about the Raytheons.
>         Paddle on.....
>         peterR
> 
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Diaz . . . Folding Kayaker newsletter
PO Box 0754, New York, NY 10024
Tel: 212-724-5069; E-mail: rdiaz_at_ix.netcom.com
"Where's your sea kayak?"----"It's in the bag."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:15 PDT