It seems a broader consideration of 'situational' might be worth considering. Some people, and I would include myself, think that balancing a 'wild creature's' safety against a human's need or desire to 'experience wilderness' is already a disjunctive bit of reasoning. Clearly, paddling up close or next to a creature is NOT the moral or physical equiv. of harpooning them for commercial or recreational hunting purposes. The ramifications and consequences of ALL encroachment are not so easily separated or delineated. Habitat is not so clearly marked by 'wild creatures' as it is by property plats and civil law. Respect for a wild creature may well entail leaving it alone. I would guess that most everyone who contributes to this list considers themselves to be more aware and sensitive to the harmful consequence of human interaction with the environment, and likely more experienced in navigating these places with as little impact as possible. I'm not convinced that this qualifies us for any sort of special consideration where whales (or bears, or cougars, or snail darters) are concerned. One critical distinction is that at the end of our experience we pack up the boat and drive 'home'. It's a problem when a backpacker allows a squirrell to feast on his GORP, because GORP doesn't grow wild in the Blue Ridge. But because squirrells don't maul people as bears might, you're not likely to see "A Fed Squirrell is a Dead Squirrell" posters at the Ranger Station. Leave No Trace means just that. It's a difficult proposition and it requires an ongoing committment to learning how one's specific, individual actions and behaviors interact with the larger ecology. When we choose to label people as Nazis, or wave the bloody shirt of Politcal Correctness, we're trying to identify ourselves as being victims of some unreasonable, illogical, and hyperbolic force that we suspect is as self-serving as it is self-destructive. In the debate over the use of Native American and Indigenous Peoples names and images for commercial and sports team use/abuse, Glenn T. Morris of Colorado AIM responded to the issue of what constituted an 'honor': "People should remember that an honor isn't born when it parts the honorer's lips, it is born when it is accepted in the honoree's ear." I offer this here because I think it goes to the heart of this notion of situational ethics. Just because I'm the creature who is aware of the ethical crux, doesn't mean I'm the creature who gets to define the 'situation'. -Will Jennings *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not to be reproduced/forwarded outside PaddleWise without author's permission Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Tue Oct 24 2000 - 11:16:31 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:30:33 PDT