PaddleWise by thread

From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] if not AL, how about wood?
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 21:13:00 -0800
Gordon Snapp" <grsnapp_at_charter.net> wrote [comparing the CLC style deck to
the Pygmy style deck]:

>> I looked at Pygmies.  I think they are also excellent boats.  I opted for
the Chesapeake for a couple of reasons.  1) Their kayaks come with
bulkheads.  Pygmies don't.  The standard method is to use a sea sock.  They
sell bulkheads as extras, which cost extra money.  Also Pygmies have
pointed, angular decks.  Chesapeakes have a nice arched deck.  I don't know
why, but the curved deck appeals to me more.  >>

I've paddled CLC boats a little and admired them a lot.  Very sexy-looking.

I've built a couple Pygmies, and paddled them extensively.  The
multi-paneled decks on Pygmies are stronger, I think, because of the chines.
Both CLC and Pygmy avoid glass on the underside of their decks.  I think
that is a weak point.  A guy who lives near me somehow crunched a hole
through the rear deck of his CLC boat.  Wish I knew what he had done, as
even without glass on either surface, the plywood is pretty strong.  All the
Pygmies are glassed on top, and the ones I own seem pretty strong.  I've
done a lot of self-rescue over the rear deck of my single, and the deck is
scratched, but shows no sign of failure.  Certainly stronger and more rigid
than my FG Eddyline boats over the rear deck.

I agree the added cost of bulkheads for a Pygmy is annoying.  On one boat, I
put 'em in (a double), and am happy with how they turned out.  On my small
single (Osprey Std), I did not put in bulkheads, because I wanted a lighter
boat.  I never use a sea sock in it -- just flotation fore and aft.  I own a
sea sock, but did not like the confining effect.  I don't think a sea sock
is mandatory with Pygmy boats, although they advocate their use.  If I
surfed my Osprey Std, I would use it, though.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <jfarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] if not AL, how about wood?
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 09:29:50 -0500
How much weight would a mini cell pillar add to a sea kayak?  Something
similar to what is in a WW kayak? Then again how much support would a pillar
add?  Why do men love to tweak things so much?

Jim et al

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Fereira" <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
> >> 2) as a 250 lb paddler, I'm concerned about the strength of the boats -
in
> >> particular the deck.  I once tried on someones wooden boat - and when I
> >> (gently) planted my backside on the deck just behind the coaming in
order
> >> to slide into the cockpit, there was a distinct creaking/crunching
sound
> >> from the deck...

> >I weigh around 205.  I was concerned about this as well.  As someone
already
> >mentioned, there's a strong bulkhead right behind the cockpit which will
> >take a lot of weight.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:33 PDT