>>However, we did receive feedback that GPS could be quite badly in >>error when satellites were low on the horizon and cliffs affected the >>signal. I'ld be interested to know if anyone has experienced this? >> >> > >GPS normally displays its range of precision, which depends on the number of >satellites that can provide a good signal at given conditions, i.e. >geographical position, obstructions etc. I don't remember what is the >lowest precision of my Garmin Legend (when it still gives some location), >but must be better than 900m error of dead reckoning. I've heard of >possible fog-induced distortion of signal, but haven't had a chance to check >it personally, so don't know whether it is just "honest" weakening of signal >(= honest lower displayed precision), or really distortion of data beyond >stated range of precision (this would be much worse). > I've used my GPS receiver on a daily basis for the last 6 years and have had a chance to see a number of anomalous indications - none of which made themselves known through exceptionally high EPE (estimated position error) or accuracy indications. These included my all-time high indicated speed of 4032.3 mph achieved while pedaling my bike in a canyon area near a medical complex. The tracklog indicated a sudden jump in position shortly followed by a loss of signal lock. I believe the hills were blocking most of the satellites and I was probably getting a momentary multi-path reflection off the medical buildings which the unit interpreted as my having rapidly moved to a new position. There was also the 5-minute period when the GPS indicated that I was at an elevation of 1500' over the north Pacific approaching Seattle at 734 mph while my other navigational tools (eyes) indicated that I was on a residential bike path in the SF Bay area and heading south at about 15 mph. The satellite page showed a lock on just 3 satellites (i.e. a 2D lock) and I suspect that this was a case where with only 3 signals the unit couldn't properly resolve between possible solutions of the pvt equations and picked the wrong one. Turning it off and back on quickly resolved the problem. But despite these and a few other momentary glitches, I've found GPS to be a highly reliable tool, especially if care is taken to check the indications on the satellite page showing the number and positions of the satellites being tracked. I have never had a problem with reception due to weather conditions and that includes thick fog and intense thunderstorms. But there can be a problem due to any film of water forming over the antenna - so condensation on the unit as a result of fog should be wiped off. Although I always have my GPS turned on when kayaking, I rarely use it for navigation. The main uses are to keep a record of the trip, incl. speeds and distances traveled, give an immediate indication of actual speed and track including the effects of wind and currents, and to show me where on shore appropriate restaurants, parks, restrooms, etc. may be located to help in deciding on landing spots. It's rarely used for navigation since I normally know where I am just by looking around. But under unusual conditions, such as the fog coming in unexpectedly, the GPS can be a valuable addition to other navigational aids. *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Sat Aug 28 2004 - 22:34:43 PDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:16 PDT