PaddleWise by thread

From: Ray Buch <raybuch_at_comcast.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:32:44 -0400
Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:

>>> Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided  
>>> groups?   It would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to  
>>> have the entire group  wet-exit into the frigid waters before you  
>>> could guide them around the  lovely scenery.   Nobody wants to  
>>> start the day out cold and  wet.  [big snip]
>  
>
During my first paddling instruction at camp (age 10) a wet exit was 
taught as part of the paddling curriculum. As a camp tripper, I had each 
group practice a wet exit before the trip left the camp. When I first 
married, I made my wife go through the exercise and then when my kids 
first got into our canoe (ages 3 &5) we went through the wet exit 
exercise again. Usually, these family practice sessions occurred in 
mid-May and in Michigan it's still pretty chilly.
I can't see an outfitter going through this at the start of each trip, 
so I guess a whopping insurance policy is the outcome.
Ray Buch
East Lansing, MI
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Goffma_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:00:39 EDT
Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided groups?   It 
would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to have the entire group  wet-exit 
into the frigid waters before you could guide them around the  lovely 
scenery.   Nobody wants to start the day out cold and  wet.  
 
Do they need to actually do a wet-exit before going paddling in case they  
flip?  I would say no - if the boats and skirts are selected properly so  that 
they release easily.  A roto-molded boat and a nylon skirt usually  part 
company pretty fast, with or without a lot of effort on the part of the  inverted 
paddler.  
 
I would say it's a different level of risk when you are talking about  
fiberglass boats and neoprene skirts , which I think was the case in the  fatality 
that lead to this law being constructed.  These materials can be  quite 
"sticky" and require a good execution of the wet-exit procedure to  separate.  You 
should require real water training if you are using  equipment like that.
 
Mark Goff
Hampden, Maine
Registered Maine Kayak Guide



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 19:16:34 -0700
Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:

>Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided groups?   
>
.....

>Do they need to actually do a wet-exit before going paddling in case they  
>flip?  
>


Have everyone sign a waiver that they understand the trip is not a 
training class.


Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:11:07 -0700
Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:
> Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided groups?   It 
> would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to have the entire group  wet-exit 
> into the frigid waters before you could guide them around the  lovely 
> scenery.   Nobody wants to start the day out cold and  wet.  [big snip]

I agree it is not customer friendly to start them out wet.  OTOH, they 
should understand and appreciate the nature of the boat/system they are 
about to use for transport.

Could be that some attention to a change of clothes, and some ample 
towelage would allow them to sample a wet exit or two, dry off and change 
into dry togs, and then go touring.  Probably make them a bit more cautious 
about capsizing, no?

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James Farrelly <JFarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:54:48 -0400
On Jun 8, 2007, at 1:11 AM, Dave Kruger wrote:

> Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:
>> Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided  
>> groups?   It would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to  
>> have the entire group  wet-exit into the frigid waters before you  
>> could guide them around the  lovely scenery.   Nobody wants to  
>> start the day out cold and  wet.  [big snip]
>
This outfitter seems to think its worth the trouble. With pictures  
and stuff of cold wet customers.

http://www.yachtforums.com/forums/general-yachting-discussion/7055- 
splash.html

Enjoy,

Jim
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:06:36 -0400
I think the prospect of swimming in less than 55 degree water would  
dissuade most people from signing up for the trip even if they were  
promised instant teleportation to a sauna. Many of these people don't  
even want to get their feet wet while getting into their boats - full  
submersion is out of the question. This is not to say that it  
wouldn't be beneficial and improve safety, but it is pretty tough as  
a business model: We will bring you out to see beautiful things, but  
we first want to attempt to drown you and bring you to the verge of  
hypothermia. The people who are willing to sign up despite the  
requirement of a dunking are probably at the lowest risk of panic in  
a capsize, and in least need of the actual dunking.

I suspect that businesses would instantly lose a significant  
percentage of their customers and as a result go out of business.

So, the question becomes: is the opportunity to experience beautiful  
places worth the risk of a very small number of people dying in the  
attempt? I think that is up to a fully informed customer to decide.
Nick



On Jun 8, 2007, at 1:11 AM, Dave Kruger wrote:

> Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:
>> Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided  
>> groups?   It would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to  
>> have the entire group  wet-exit into the frigid waters before you  
>> could guide them around the  lovely scenery.   Nobody wants to  
>> start the day out cold and  wet.  [big snip]
>
> I agree it is not customer friendly to start them out wet.  OTOH,  
> they should understand and appreciate the nature of the boat/system  
> they are about to use for transport.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:26:08 -0700
Nick Schade wrote:

> So, the question becomes: is the opportunity to experience beautiful 
> places worth the risk of a very small number of people dying in the 
> attempt? I think that is up to a fully informed customer to decide.

I suppose, put in the context of scenic flights, roller coasters, and 
bungie jumping, etc. ... paddling on cold water, in the company of a 
competent guide able to avoid difficult conditions ... may be a reasonable 
risk.  Be good to lawyer up tight with a good consent form ahead of time. 
After all, life is full of risk.  And then, you die.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramersec_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:58:00 -0400
Lest you think this is restricted to Massachusetts, I once had a 
class in Charleston, SC in mid May in which one of the students 
got so chilled from the obligatory wet exit at the start of 
class that he did not continue the course. He was appropriately 
dressed and did the exit willingly when I explained why I 
thought it was needed. He was 70+ years old.

Steve

Nick Schade wrote:
> I think the prospect of swimming in less than 55 degree water would  
> dissuade most people from signing up for the trip even if they were  
> promised instant teleportation to a sauna. Many of these people don't  
> even want to get their feet wet while getting into their boats - full  
> submersion is out of the question. This is not to say that it  wouldn't 
> be beneficial and improve safety, but it is pretty tough as  a business 
> model: We will bring you out to see beautiful things, but  we first want 
> to attempt to drown you and bring you to the verge of  hypothermia.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Ralph Hoehn <FoldingBoats_at_aol.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 08:34:33 -0400
> Goffma_at_aol.com wrote:
>> Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided  
>> groups?   It would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to  
>> have the entire group  wet-exit into the frigid waters before you  
>> could guide them around the  lovely scenery.   Nobody wants to  
>> start the day out cold and  wet.  [big snip]

On Jun 8, 2007, at 1:11 AM, Dave Kruger wrote:
> I agree it is not customer friendly to start them out wet.  OTOH, they 
> should understand and appreciate the nature of the boat/system they 
> are about to use for transport.

On June 08, 2007 9:07 AM Nick Schade wrote:
I think the prospect of swimming in less than 55 degree water would dissuade
most people from signing up for the trip even if they were promised instant
teleportation to a sauna. Many of these people don't even want to get their
feet wet while getting into their boats - full submersion is out of the
question. This is not to say that it wouldn't be beneficial and improve
safety, but it is pretty tough as a business model: We will bring you out to
see beautiful things, but we first want to attempt to drown you and bring
you to the verge of hypothermia. The people who are willing to sign up
despite the requirement of a dunking are probably at the lowest risk of
panic in a capsize, and in least need of the actual dunking.

I suspect that businesses would instantly lose a significant percentage of
their customers and as a result go out of business.

So, the question becomes: is the opportunity to experience beautiful places
worth the risk of a very small number of people dying in the attempt? I
think that is up to a fully informed customer to decide.

On June 15 Ralph Hoehn writes:
That brings up an excellent point: in a business situation can the business
be expected to take on all responsibility or does the ultimate
responsibility for safety remain with the client? And to what extent is the
client even able to assess the risks?

A few days ago we met up with a gentleman who is planning to paddle the full
length of the Mississippi in up to 90 days, starting some time in July ...
after his scheduled prostrate biopsy, whatever the outcome of that. The
fully decked folding boat that he intends to use is so stable that he thinks
it highly unlikely to capsize during the entire trip. However, he readily
agreed that it would be wise to test his self-rescue equipment in any case.
There was a bit of a breeze out on the lake, so the testing even had a
slight element of realism ...

After receiving a brief explanation of how his deckbag-cum-paddlefloat is
best deployed, he held his nose and, with some difficulty, rolled the boat
over. He seemed to experience very little disorientation after his head
popped back up, kept his paddle between himself and the boat while
unbuckling one side of the deck bag, which he then flipped over with the
other side still buckled so that he could insert one paddle blade into the
bag's underside pouch. He then attached the other blade to the aft deck and
scrambled back into the boat. 

Since he is very light and the boat fairly big, he did not at first realize
that scrambling around on top of the deck as if on dry land raises even his
light centre of gravity to a point where the total stability of the
paddler-plus-boat is compromised. On the first go around he got away with
it. The second time he did pitch over the other side -- should have put some
binoculars, water, etc. in that deckbag to act as a counterweight, I guess
-- that taught him a valuable lesson! He scrambled right back up though and
then went over a fourth time for a final confidence booster.

The water was not all that cold, but I was glad that I was wearing my
neoprene farmer john! By the time we got back into the car, our friend, in
light shirt and shorts, was shivering quite badly from the combined chilling
effect of the immersion and the subsequent drying in the breeze. I wonder
whether he would have been "fully informed" other than through this
experience -- mere words might not have got the message across.

I'm no friend of restrictive legislation, certainly not when it concerns
personal safety -- in general that's best left to personal responsibility in
my view. However, I wonder whether it is a good business model, whatever the
short term profit motive, to take paying clients "to experience beautiful
places" if those clients were to display a singular lack of personal
responsibility by being put off the proposed trip by going through an
exercise that is quite necessary to increase their safety and that of
would-be rescuers if things do go wrong?

Ralph Hoehn
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:49:57 -0400
"Fully informed" does not mean they need to be told how they will  
feel when they are actually in the water. It can be "You may die if  
you fall in this water. Chances are very low that you will, however  
if you do, there are a few things you can do that help your survival.  
We would like to help you practice them before we, but you will get  
wet and cold. You are not required to practice them, but we strongly  
recommend it."

  I don't think it is a bad business model to forego the wet exit  
training given how low the likelihood of the clients swimming really  
is. There are kayak tour groups going out somewhere in this country  
every day. How many deaths due to the inability to wet exit have  
there been? I can only think of one, and it has lead to this proposed  
law. How much effort should a business go through to reduce the death  
rate to zero? It is impossible to create that kind of safety, so a  
line must be drawn somewhere. I don't know where the proper point is.  
There are many businesses which operate with much more risk. Ski  
areas let their customers choose where on the mountain they will ski  
without the requirement to prove they can do it safely. Shouldn't  
they require everyone pass a test before they start down a double  
black diamond?
Nick


On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Ralph Hoehn wrote:

> The water was not all that cold, but I was glad that I was wearing my
> neoprene farmer john! By the time we got back into the car, our  
> friend, in
> light shirt and shorts, was shivering quite badly from the combined  
> chilling
> effect of the immersion and the subsequent drying in the breeze. I  
> wonder
> whether he would have been "fully informed" other than through this
> experience -- mere words might not have got the message across.
>
> I'm no friend of restrictive legislation, certainly not when it  
> concerns
> personal safety -- in general that's best left to personal  
> responsibility in
> my view. However, I wonder whether it is a good business model,  
> whatever the
> short term profit motive, to take paying clients "to experience  
> beautiful
> places" if those clients were to display a singular lack of personal
> responsibility by being put off the proposed trip by going through an
> exercise that is quite necessary to increase their safety and that of
> would-be rescuers if things do go wrong?

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Ralph Hoehn <FoldingBoats_at_aol.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 10:01:12 -0400
Fully agreed, Nick!

As I stated before, I do not support this type of legislation. I actually
feel that responsibility for personal safety must remain with the
individual, not with a business or even an instructor -- except for cases
where a business sets out to mislead the customer to gain their business.
That's certainly not the case here though.

As far as I'm concerned your approach, described below, covers it. But
people there are people out there who go boating (not just in kayaks either)
without giving any thought to the risks and then rush to sue when they face
the consequences of their own irresponsibility. 

Ralph

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Schade 

"Fully informed" does not mean they need to be told how they will feel when
they are actually in the water. It can be "You may die if you fall in this
water. Chances are very low that you will, however if you do, there are a
few things you can do that help your survival.  
We would like to help you practice them before we, but you will get wet and
cold. You are not required to practice them, but we strongly recommend it."

  I don't think it is a bad business model to forego the wet exit training
given how low the likelihood of the clients swimming really is. There are
kayak tour groups going out somewhere in this country every day. How many
deaths due to the inability to wet exit have there been? I can only think of
one, and it has lead to this proposed law. How much effort should a business
go through to reduce the death rate to zero? It is impossible to create that
kind of safety, so a line must be drawn somewhere. I don't know where the
proper point is.  
There are many businesses which operate with much more risk. Ski areas let
their customers choose where on the mountain they will ski without the
requirement to prove they can do it safely. Shouldn't they require everyone
pass a test before they start down a double black diamond?
Nick
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James Farrelly <JFarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:16:34 -0400
> Ski areas let their customers choose where on the mountain they  
> will ski without the requirement to prove they can do it safely.  
> Shouldn't they require everyone pass a test before they start down  
> a double black diamond?
> Nick
>
>

Agreed on your comparison Nick. But just how are we perceived? Skiing  
is very mainstream and well known. Kayaking is odd and unknown. Just  
look at the sticks some of them use to make the boat go. Those guys  
are nuts. Maybe we need to reel them in. A friend is a retired Army  
helicopter pilot with three stab wound scars from a bar fight gone  
bad. He once told me after a few beers that the fact that I take  
homemade boats out into the ocean was a very risky thing to do. It  
makes me laugh in a good way.

Jim et al
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramersec_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream...
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:35:41 -0400
I agree and don't with these analogies. I once had a ski instructor tell 
me to go ahead and fall down and get it over with, so i wouldn't worry 
about it. I got cold and wet, didn't enjoy it much. Also, selling you a 
lift ticket is in a different class of fish from taking you on a guided 
tour, perhaps.

I would also caution Jim about laughing at things that aren't jokes when 
uttered by guys who get in knife fights at bars.

Steve

James Farrelly wrote:
>> Ski areas let their customers choose where on the mountain they will 
>> ski without the requirement to prove they can do it safely. Shouldn't 
>> they require everyone pass a test before they start down a double 
>> black diamond?
>> Nick
> 
> Agreed on your comparison Nick. But just how are we perceived? Skiing is 
> very mainstream and well known. Kayaking is odd and unknown. Just look 
> at the sticks some of them use to make the boat go. Those guys are nuts. 
> Maybe we need to reel them in. A friend is a retired Army helicopter 
> pilot with three stab wound scars from a bar fight gone bad. He once 
> told me after a few beers that the fact that I take homemade boats out 
> into the ocean was a very risky thing to do. It makes me laugh in a good 
> way.



-- 
Steve Cramer
Athens, GA
http://www.savvypaddler.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jennifer Pivovar <jpivovar_at_headwinds.org>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 09:13:20 -0400
From: Goffma_at_aol.com

>  Does the wet-exit demonstration requirement apply to guided
>  groups?   It would be a real burden here in Maine if you had to have > the entire group wet-exit into the frigid waters before you could 
> guide them around the lovely scenery.
> Do they need to actually do a wet-exit before going paddling in case
> they flip?  I would say no - if the boats and skirts are selected
> properly so  that they release easily.

Mark,

I have to say that after 4 years of teaching beginners to kayak I am now
fully convinced that a preliminary wet-exit is necessary.  I have yet to
see _anyone_ (including swimmers) fail to get at minimum disoriented and
at worst panic when they capsize for the first time.  If it is an
unintentional capsize the reaction is almost always worse.  Spending 30
minutes on a pre-trip practice capsize is the only way to alleviate
this.  Once over is worth more than hours of lecturing and "practicing"
sitting on the ground.

The cold water should not deter the practice - it should make it more
necessary.  If someone were to unintentionally capsize for the first
time while you are all in your boats you are much less likely to give
them the same level of help as when you are standing next to them in the
water.  I think the cold water would enhance the panic response even if
it's not cold-shock level.  You could have a lender dry-suit for
practice so they can not be cold & wet when they begin the trip.

BTW - the water doesn't need to be challenging.  Most novice capsizes
seem to be in flat calm with a little trip over the paddle.

You may be lucky and never have the situation -- it's your call.


Jennifer

-- 
  Jennifer Pivovar
  jpivovar_at_headwinds.org
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Scott Hilliard <kiayker_at_sbcglobal.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:29:18 -0700
   Some strong arguments can certainly be made in favor of doing wet exits, 
and teaching bracing for that matter, at the beginning of a class. This is 
an issue that the company I work for has struggled with for years. However 
we have found the reality of it is that it's just not practical. I have been 
teaching sea kayaking commercially for over fifteen years, and I can state 
for a fact that when the class becomes wet and cold you will lose their 
attention. Once that happens you might as well pack it in - nobody's going 
to learn anything more. The solutions to this dilemma are generally too 
prohibitive in time, money and student comfort, which in turn drives away 
potential customers. While some of the holly rollers on this list might 
think that a good thing, I doubt any of them are trying to make a living at 
this sport.
   I have to wonder just how important an issue this really is anyway? OK, 
so one guy had a problem in a class and his survivor, who has probably never 
been in a kayak before, appealed to some law maker who also has probably 
never been in a kayak before but thought he would try to fix a problem of 
which he really has no understanding. Yeah, I know I feel safer with people 
like that looking over me. Heck, several years ago a kayak instructor in 
Alaska demo'ed a roll and hit his head on the bottom and died. Perhaps we 
should pass a law requiring helmets be worn before rolling! These cases are 
tragic, but hardly representative of the dangers of our sport.
   Of the hundreds of classes I have taught over the years I have not had 
one single incident of someone's life being threatened as the result of a 
capsize. That's not to say it can never happen, but if it does it will be a 
very rare exception of the kind that is difficult to predict or prepare for. 
We take whatever precautions we can, but the incident in question was a 
fluke, plain and simple. It does not require a new law be passed to prevent 
future episodes, and I do not see a real problem with saving the intentional 
wet exits until the end of the class.

Scott
So.Cal. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James <jimtibensky_at_fastmail.fm>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:17:49 -0500
Scott Hilliard said: I can state for a fact that when the class becomes
wet and cold you will lose their 
attention. Once that happens you might as well pack it in - nobody's
going to learn anything more. 



My two cents' worth -   I lead trips for a youth counseling service.  We
take eight teens to Maine every August and do a Spring Break trip
somewhere, usually the Everglades lately.  Especially in Maine, where
the water is cold, we have determined that a wet exit is not a good idea
before sarting on the trip.  Same reasons Scott gives - the wet, cold
kids are not in a frame of mind to paddle safely.  Our solution is to
explain what they should do if they tip and to make sure before we go
that everyone is comfortable swimming.  The kids are always, without
exception, in doubles, so the risk of tipping is greatly reduced.  We
don't paddle in rough conditions.  And, most importantly, the spray
skirts are nylon and pass the "knee test" before we paddle.  That is,
each kid sits in the cockpit, puts the skirt on, and then lifts his or
her knee.  If the skirt pops off, which it always does, then we know the
kid will be out of the boat if it tips.  The doubles have large
cockpits, no concern about being stuck.

If we get a warm day and are in camp early, we have the youth do wet
exits before they go swimming, but the cold water keeps most of them
from wanting to swim.

This isn't ideal, but we have had doubles tip over only twice in all the
trips we have done and no one has panicked or got hurt.

I have always wanted to have a pre-trip wet exit session in a pool at
home, but we feel nylon skirts is a safe and prudent compromise.  The
one time we went to Glacier Bay and had real skirts we did a half day
pre-trip session that included wet exit and paddling practice.


Jim Tibensky
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Tord Eriksson <tord_at_tord.nu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Backers of kayak bill may be paddling upstream - Framingham,...
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 17:18:47 +0200
On Saturday 09 June 2007 02:35, Jennifer wrote:

> I have to say that after 4 years of teaching beginners to kayak I am now
> fully convinced that a preliminary wet-exit is necessary.  I have yet to
> see _anyone_ (including swimmers) fail to get at minimum disoriented and
> at worst panic when they capsize for the first time.  If it is an
> unintentional capsize the reaction is almost always worse.  Spending 30
> minutes on a pre-trip practice capsize is the only way to alleviate
> this.  Once over is worth more than hours of lecturing and "practicing"
> sitting on the ground.

I agree fully! To make it less of a scare, submit watertight head-gear,
as immersing your head can provoke the gasp reaction - been there,
done that - and getting cold water into your ears can be dangerous,
the experts tell me.

When the wife and I accidentally rolled we both wore very water-repellent
thick fleece caps from Musto (seem to be out of production - a pity!), and
neither had any gasp reaction - thank God, as we were surrounded by
a very cold sea - 38 F (3 C)! 

Tord
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:44 PDT