On 11/8/07, Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com> wrote: > > > In terms a dumb chemist might understand, I think this means we don't know > what proportion of bodies found dead swam, and which proportion, instead, > held onto the hull until they passed out and could not hold on any longer. Nor does it quantify who might have drowned because they were incapacitated in other ways (drunk, for instance). A rather large proportion of people who fall out of boats have been drinking. But I think that there is some value in a study that tells us that a person might be better off making a judgement about whether to swim or stay based on the water temperature, the distance to shore, and their ability to swim (with or without a pfd). As opposed to sticking with a hard and fast rule. Someone observed here that there are swimmers who habitually spend an hour or more in water that experts tell us will have us dead in 30 to 40 minutes. It might be that the experts really don't know much about this after all. Craig Jungers Moses Lake, WA *************************************************************************** PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author. Submissions: PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net Subscriptions: PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net Website: http://www.paddlewise.net/ ***************************************************************************Received on Thu Nov 08 2007 - 20:54:28 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:31:27 PDT