PaddleWise by thread

From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 23:07:46 -0800
Hi gang again!

I had some private e-mail questions about wooden boat construction. This is
most likely due to my endorsement of heavier and stiffer and the fact that
I've said I would like to built myself a strong, wooden kayak.

To be quite frank, I have not researched the subject yet, nor have I read
any books on the process yet (such as Nick's). I don't know why people ask
my opinion about stuff - I'm an sea kayak enthusiast, not an expert.
_However_, I've never not been one to offer my opinions, wanted or not :-)

One of the questions was how stiff does a kayak need to be, and what is an
ideal weight for a strong, longer sea kayak. I would posit a position on
this, suggesting 45 to 55 lbs, depending on paint and hatch options. A skeg
box can also add a lot of weight. I also think a wooden boat should be
fairly stiff, as stated before. I can't buy into Alex's "lively" kayak
philosophy. I've never, never seen a race kayak that was lively. They are
all stiff, very stiff (and light due to limitless funding). If a kayak is
flexing, that is energy being expended, so its being wasted somewhere
simply from a physics point of view (please, no more flames...aaaahhhhh!
-well, at least no more minor candle burns). I try to buy into Ralph's
philosophy with folders - that a boat contouring with the waves is
performance enhanced, but I don't think I could prove it empirically.

The other question I was asked relates to the procedure for actually laying
up the fiberglass on the wood, and what cloth to use - 4 or 6 ounce. I
would suggest other listserver groups for that answer, but of course, I
will say what I think, now that I seem to have a seam reputation. 

One of the paddlewisers in question is building a CLC North Bay stitch
n'glue. He wants to fiberglass the deck , put extra tape on the chines and
beam, and recess the hatches which will require extra plywood layers for
reinforcement (none of which is specified in the plans for the 40 lb boat.
He is not too concerned with weight.

Another paddlewiser is a month or two away from fiberglassings his
Guillemot, but is wondering what to do about a glassing schedule for the
hull. Nick Schade's plans recommend 6 oz. inside and outside for a standard
layup. Our fellow PW'er wants it a bit stronger than that, but doesn't want
to go overboard.

I may modify my following advice when I'm actually ready to build my own
boat. But at the onset, this is the way _I_ would proceed (this is my
partial "top ten" list of items to consider):

1. At a minimum, from the back bulkhead to the front bulkhead, lay in 6 oz
cloth. You need that thickness for center rigidity and wear from in and out
paddler movement. 4 oz is not enough.

2. If the bow or stern are going to be difficult to get to because your
construction sequence is such that the two halves are already going to be
joined, and if you want more glass on the inside of the bow and stern, you
can glass the wood pieces in sections first, as this is much easier than
getting the glass in later.

3. Fiberglass wooden bulkheads in with glass (cut and glassed first, both
sides). To actually secure them in their positions, make up a putty of
epoxy resin to use as a fillet all around the perimeter, rather than glass
tape. Much easier, I would think.

4. As far as the big question of the outside, start by placing the kayak on
its side, not on its hull. Take 6 oz cloth and lay it out such that 2
inches overlaps the gunwale line, onto the deck, and then cut the cloth so
that 2 inches also overlap the keel line. Important - let this cure. Next
morning, do the same to the other side. You now have a double layer at the
keel line, and 2 inches is enough to fair out.

5. Once cured to a point, place kayak on hull, and lay cloth over deck. 4
oz will cut down on weight, but may actually be more expensive that 6oz,
depending upon supply and demand in your area. For the cutting allowances,
I would simply drape the cloth so that 2 inches overlaps the gunwales on
each side. You now have double layers along the seams after epoxy.

6. It is a good idea, and I usually do this with wood and epoxy things. Wet
out the wood and or plywood first by painting on the epoxy resin. Let it
dry. Do this for all your parts -everything. As you work with each piece of
wood or perhaps the entire deck or hull or whatever portion you are working
on, sand it out lightly at the point where it cures without "balling-up" on
the sandpaper. If you let it go for a few days, it gets too hard to sand.

7. Then, and only then, are you ready to wet the surface out again, add the
cloth, and wet it out too, buy pouring on the mixture and using a squeegee
(SP). I do not like rollers, personally. Regardless of how you apply and
spread-out the resin, if you have too many layers of cloth, like three 4 oz
layers, you will never get the right saturation - its just too hard to tell
how much resin is being soaked up or squeezed out.
 
8. The reason for pre-wetting out the plywood, is the fact that this allows
a more consistent approach to absorption into the wood fibers - you can see
what is happening before the cloth goes on later. You will need to sand, as
mentioned, and possibly wash with detergent a bit because of the "blushing"
issue and wax residue. This method should help produce a better, stronger
boat.

9. I would use something like the West System fast cure 205 for all your
work. You need to work fast with it, and may need to use masking tape cloth
in place to keep organized, but the pay back is faster finishing, and more
importantly, you get a lot less pooling and run-down and drips and dry
spots near chines where gravity would pull sections dry with the slower
drying epoxy formulas.

10. You can use paint too. Then you are free to make a mess, fit pieces
with less precision, then back-fill a bit. Paint covers it all up, but as
paint is 50% solids, the boat will dry a bit heavy in the end - and you
don't get to show off your workmanship and the beauty of the wood.

So, that's my take on it. I probably can't answer any other questions at
this time, and I am not open to flames or abuse on this one. I'm just
trying to help out some PW friends, and let you in on the discussion.

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kolsen_at_imagelan.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:28:41 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Doug Lloyd wrote:

> I also think a wooden boat should be
> fairly stiff, as stated before. I can't buy into Alex's "lively" kayak
> philosophy.

What about the additional power you need to use to start or stop turning,
lots of unnecessary rotational energy.

I'm fully in favor of ultra stiff boats in flat conditions.
I don't buy the heavier is better argument, unless you need a battering ram.
I'm undecided on a stiff versus a flexible boat in rough conditions, 
I'm leaning toward flexible is better.

One day I paddled with a friend, your basic out and back paddle.  I was 
in my open jaw skin/frame baidarka.  He was in my VCP PinTail.  There was 
a brisk wind which generated 1 to 2 foot waves.  Going downwind, with 
following seas, we paddled at about the same speed.  Going into the waves 
the pintail did a lot of pounding, riding up over one wave and crashing down 
the back.  The baidarka cruised along like the conditions were flat.  I had
to stop regularly to let him catch up.  Anyone done any real tests - e.g.
timings on a fixed course comparing the speed differences in flat versus 
rough conditions for both rigid and flexible boats?  
 
> I've never, never seen a race kayak that was lively.

Quick someone find Doug a slalom whitewater race boat...

kirk
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Glenn Stauffer <stauffer_at_swarthmore.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:07:29 -0500
I'm preparing to build a skin/frame baidarka and everything I read holds the
sea worthiness of these relatively flexible boats in very high regard -
especially given that they were routinely used in some of the roughest and
most hazardous seas on the planet (according to the books; I've never been
there).  Is the stiffness argument as it relates to glass boats more a
matter of whether you  can make a lightweight, flexible 'glass boat and not
significantly sacrifice strength rather than whether stiffness is a highly
desireable trait for a general use sea kayak?  I buy the flexible argument
myself, but would have serious questions about the durability of a flexible
plastic or 'glass boat since neither has an internal framework.

Glenn Stauffer

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirk Olsen" <kolsen_at_imagelan.com>
To: "Doug Lloyd" <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
Cc: <paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)


> I'm undecided on a stiff versus a flexible boat in rough conditions,
> I'm leaning toward flexible is better.
>
> One day I paddled with a friend, your basic out and back paddle.  I was
> in my open jaw skin/frame baidarka.  He was in my VCP PinTail.  There was
> a brisk wind which generated 1 to 2 foot waves.  Going downwind, with
> following seas, we paddled at about the same speed.  Going into the waves
> the pintail did a lot of pounding, riding up over one wave and crashing
down
> the back.  The baidarka cruised along like the conditions were flat.  I
had
> to stop regularly to let him catch up.  Anyone done any real tests - e.g.
> timings on a fixed course comparing the speed differences in flat versus
> rough conditions for both rigid and flexible boats?



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kolsen_at_imagelan.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] flexy boats (was Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...))
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:30:36 -0500 (EST)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Glenn Stauffer wrote:

> I'm preparing to build a skin/frame baidarka and everything I read holds the
> sea worthiness of these relatively flexible boats in very high regard -

In terms of building I'm assuming you picked up a copy of Wolfgang Brinck's
"Building an Aleutian Kayak" for building instructions and George Dyson's
"Baidarka" for inpiration.  http://robroy.totalsports.net/baidarka has a 
whole bunch of useful links along with a searchable archive of the baidarka
mailing list (subscription info is there too).

> Is the stiffness argument as it relates to glass boats more a
> matter of whether you  can make a lightweight, flexible 'glass boat and not
> significantly sacrifice strength rather than whether stiffness is a highly
> desireable trait for a general use sea kayak? 

I don't think you can build a properly flexible 'glass boat so I believe any 
flex, in a 'glass boat, is wasted energy.

Which leaves a separate flexibility argument.  Is there a benefit of having
a flexible boat over having a rigid boat.  Regardless of what the material
used was.

> I buy the flexible argument myself,

I need test numbers to be convinced.  One of these days I'll have to run
the tests, since I've got the desired boats - a super stiff boat, a 
british heavy and a flexy baidarka.  Sorry, Duane the only plastic boats 
I want are whitewater ones ;-)

> but would have serious questions about the durability of a flexible
> plastic or 'glass boat since neither has an internal framework.

agreed.

I've seen one greenland style kayak built with a frame and a single 
layer of epoxied kevlar as the skin.  It leaked, the instant the skin 
flexed the resin spider web cracked and started leaking.  I've heard 
rumblings of flexible epoxy but haven't seen any, much less tried it.
 
kirk

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_home.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 23:23:17 -0500
Kirk Olsen wrote:

>  Anyone done any real tests - e.g.
> timings on a fixed course comparing the speed differences in flat versus
> rough conditions for both rigid and flexible boats?

This is only valid for the identical hull in two different materials/layups
whatever.  That's not easy to do with off-the-shelf designs, since there
aren't many designs that are offered in both rigid and flexible models.

It's too bad that Matt couldn't test the glass and skin versions of the
baidarka - that would be interesting to hear about.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Richard Kemmer <rkemmer_at_home.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 10:55:04 -0600
----- Original Message -----

> I'm preparing to build a skin/frame baidarka and everything I read holds
the
> sea worthiness of these relatively flexible boats in very high regard -
Is the stiffness argument as it relates to glass boats more a
> matter of whether you  can make a lightweight, flexible 'glass boat and
not
> significantly sacrifice strength rather than whether stiffness is a highly
> desireable trait for a general use sea kayak?  >

Glen,
I'm no engineer, but I do have preferences.  One is for flexible
skin-on-frame boats.  Built a baidarka in a workshop and absolutely love it.
Before "modern" sea kayaks became the rage, built Folbot kits and loved them
too.  There's no experience like paddling a boat that lives with and works
with the sea.

The strength of a baidarka comes not from stiffness but from forces working
in tension.  For example, when the boat flexes to the right, more pressure
is exerted on the left to bring it back to center.  When a force is directed
outward, it is contained by the skin pressing inward.  The boat is unlikely
to be "broken" by flexure; its weakness is inability to withstand sharp
impact or slicing.  But even if an impact broke several ribs, the boat's
overall strenth would not be materially diminished; redundancy of ribs and
chines and the integrity of the skin leave sufficient forces under tension
to keep the boat in tact.

Held my tongue through the previous discussion, because I know nothing about
building glass boats.  Still, based on experience with skin-frame craft,
have a hard time understanding the preference for weight and stiffness.
Would think that a kayak, even without a frame, would be like a
skyscraper -- where appropriate flex actually adds strength to the design.
Stand to be corrected on this assumption if it's wrong.

Rick



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 19:11:17 -0800
At 11:07 AM 1/14/00 -0500, you wrote:
>I'm preparing to build a skin/frame baidarka and everything I read holds the
>sea worthiness of these relatively flexible boats in very high regard -
>especially given that they were routinely used in some of the roughest and
>most hazardous seas on the planet (according to the books; I've never been
>there).  Is the stiffness argument as it relates to glass boats more a
>matter of whether you  can make a lightweight, flexible 'glass boat and not
>significantly sacrifice strength rather than whether stiffness is a highly
>desireable trait for a general use sea kayak?  I buy the flexible argument
>myself, but would have serious questions about the durability of a flexible
>plastic or 'glass boat since neither has an internal framework.
<snip>

My take on this is that the stiffness vs flexible debate is a matter of
personal taste. Certainly, for a _long_ sea boat in glass, I much prefer
stiff. Shorter VCP Pintail type kayaks are a little less important. There
are certain wave dynamics where a skin-on-frame kayak may excel, depending
upon the hull shape and paddlers style. The issue to me isn't one of
performance and energy return, but ultimately of seaworthiness, and I would
rather have a stiffer kayak, _if_ its a long fiberglass kayak I am
paddling. Do also remember that I'm the guy who folded a lightweight river
kayak in half in the surf at Longbeach, was part of a huge rescue where a
fiberglass boat's seams let go. I'm a little sensitive about the whole
structrural integrity issue. I also have got my Nordkapp "hung-up" high in
a surge channel along the west coast, end-to-end between walls of the chasm
when a rogue swell rose then receded - this with full expedition gear
aboard. My parameters are a lot different than most paddlers, so I should
just bow out of this whole conversation, though it has been fun and I've
learn't a lot over the last week from everyone on this list. Most of you
are so mature and kind with your opinions and views - it is a privilege to
exchange e-mails via paddlewise with you.

BC'in Ya
Doug Lloyd 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Alex Ferguson <a.ferguson_at_chem.canterbury.ac.nz>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:52:59 +1300
[DL]
>I also think a wooden boat should be
>fairly stiff, as stated before. I can't buy into Alex's "lively" kayak
>philosophy.

Semantics - I mean livley as in bouncing on the sea, not the hull flexing.

>The other question I was asked relates to the procedure for actually laying
>up the fiberglass on the wood, and what cloth to use - 4 or 6 ounce.

I don't glass the surface of the wood, just the joins. Saves all that extra
weight of glass and resin plus all the extra work. A 3mm hull is stiffer
than my glass boat (which isn't all that light) and most I build are 4 mm ply.

Alex
.
.
Alex (Sandy) Ferguson
Chemistry Department
University of Canterbury
New Zealand
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Doug Lloyd <dlloyd_at_bc.sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Dear Dougie (My wooden boat...)
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:24:55 -0800
At 01:52 PM 1/17/00 +1300, you wrote:
>[DL]
>>I also think a wooden boat should be
>>fairly stiff, as stated before. I can't buy into Alex's "lively" kayak
>>philosophy.
>
>Semantics - I mean livley as in bouncing on the sea, not the hull flexing.
>
>>The other question I was asked relates to the procedure for actually laying
>>up the fiberglass on the wood, and what cloth to use - 4 or 6 ounce.
>
>I don't glass the surface of the wood, just the joins. Saves all that extra
>weight of glass and resin plus all the extra work. A 3mm hull is stiffer
>than my glass boat (which isn't all that light) and most I build are 4 mm
ply.
>
>Alex
 
Alex, et al:
The "lively" thing is a bit subjective admittedly, as is apparently the
definition too. 
As far as 3mm  or 4mm ply hull, yes, it is fairly tuff stuff if you go with
the marine grade version without voids and seal it well with a finish - and
no extra weight. But, I have seen punctured plywood, and it is not a pretty
sight. I'm far too clumsy not too glass my ply hull when I finally build.

I would also think that glassing the outside as a minimum would give the
hull a lot more wearability for routine up and down beach dragging. I also
think that glassing inside and also outside the hull must bring about
unequivocal and multitudinous levels of superior strength to a hull, and
not just because of a thicker rendition of the hull. I would think a piece
of plywood with a layer of glass on each side must be incredibly strong and
rigid due to the fact that if flex pressure is brought to bear on the
plywood, the glass on one side prevents the glass on the other side from
elongating or shortening. This must be even more true for curved surfaces
with a cedar-strip built boat. My terminology needs some help here, but
surely this is the reason glassed wooden boats have such a strong
reputation for being strong.

Enjoying the conversation,

BC'in Ya
Doug lloyd

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - All postings copyright the author and not
to be reproduced outside PaddleWise without author's permission
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:07 PDT