PaddleWise by thread

From: <DMon707_at_aol.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 14:23:45 EST
My 1984 Volvo 240 Wagon holds two feathercrafts inside plus all the related 
gear and food for a month of paddling. I've driven with my partner from SF to 
Seattle, SF to Maine (via Lake Superior), SF to the Everglades, SF to Baja. 
As my mechanic said when I bought it (used) "You'll get bored with it before 
it starts to break down." I love boring cars. The Volvo is my best ever.

douglas
san francisco

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: AJ Mallory <amallory_at_Pawsable.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:55:59 -0800
<<Jennifer Pivovar wrote: > the 240 is quite straightforward, well laid out
and stuff easily accessible in the engine compartment>>

I have looked at other vehicles because I was told the Volvos were expensive
to maintain and that part were expensive for them. How do they compare with
a Honda of Toyota for cost of repairs? 

AJ Mallory
Portland, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jennifer Pivovar <kayak_at_headwinds.org>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:45:27 -0800 (PST)
> <<Jennifer Pivovar wrote: > the 240 is quite...>>

> AJ Mallory <amallory_at_Pawsable.com> wrote:
> I have looked at other vehicles because I was told
> the Volvos were expensive to maintain and that part 
> were expensive for them.  How do they compare with
> a Honda of Toyota for cost of repairs? 

AJ,

I can't really compare, never having had a Honda or
Toyota.  I can say that, except for oil & lubes, the
only parts I have ever put into this car are:
Front brake pads _at_ 75K
Front & rear brake pads & rotors _at_ 180K
Clutch _at_115K
Rebuilt waterpump, 100K (also added in a timing belt)
Rebuilt starter, 120K
1 battery after 6 years
1 full set of shocks, 135K

I think the total for all this service (parts &
labor)was less than 3,000 USD. For 12 years, that's an
ave of <$250 a year + tires, oil, plugs & wires. 
That's why I can't part with it! And still no visible
rust after the last 9 years in the snow belt.  I've
never had a lower TCO vehicle.  Although I should
mention that my '73 140 Wagon took me 243,000 miles
:).  I spent a lot more time and money in the shop
with my pickups (1 dodge, 1 chevy) and cars (1 dodge,
1 renault) - then went back to the Volvo-every-10-year
plan.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramersec_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:13 -0500
This doesn't meet quite all of Harley's requirements, but I do have a 
boat-carrying car available. I've gotten more compliments on this than 
any other car I've owned. It's a 1986 Ford Country Squire Woody Wagon. 
(OK, not real wood). "5.0" liter V-8, auto, room for 6 adults, tons of 
cargo space. 15-18 MPG. I haven't had more than 4 sea kayaks on the roof 
at once, so I won't make any claims about its capacity.

Steve Cramer
Athens, GA

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: AJ Mallory <amallory_at_Pawsable.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 08:40:12 -0800
Ronnie wrote:

<<Requirements;    Cheap.... Ease of repair (I try to do my own
repairs)....Great gas mileage (above 20 mpg)....Low roof line with the
ability to attach roof racks (so I can easily load my kayaks)....Enough room
to haul camping and paddling gear for two.... Stick shift and a reasonable
amount of power (needed for trips of six or seven hundred miles).>>

I'm not sure about the eases of repair, requirement, sense what I'm
suggesting is early 90's, but I'm also looking for a vehicle to haul a
kayak. I have owned a Honda CRX for over 10 years. It has been a great car
just to short to haul my 17foot 'yak. I'm leaning towards a Honda or Toyota
wagon (early to mid 90's). They stopped making them a couple of years back
in favor of SUV (yuk!). I done some checking and there doesn't seem to be a
great number of them in the used market, but I think it is the way to go.
They get very good gas mileage (my CRX gets great almost 50MPG!), They hare
a low roof line and plenty of space. Because they are wagons they have lots
of room and shouldn't have any trouble hauling a couple of boats.
	Thanks for posting the question it will be great to see what else
people suggest.

AJ Mallory
Portland, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: William Lloyd <lloyd_at_execpc.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:31:48 -0500
Toyota Camrys are nearly bulletproof; it has been suggested that they have
been the most reliable cars ever.  I had one of their wagons, loved it until
some woman totaled it....   :-(   They also got great mileage.

- Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "AJ Mallory" <amallory_at_Pawsable.com>
Subject: RE: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed


> Ronnie wrote:
>
> <<Requirements;    Cheap.... Ease of repair (I try to do my own
> repairs)....Great gas mileage (above 20 mpg)....Low roof line with the
> ability to attach roof racks (so I can easily load my kayaks)....Enough
room
> to haul camping and paddling gear for two.... Stick shift and a reasonable
> amount of power (needed for trips of six or seven hundred miles).>>
>
> I'm not sure about the eases of repair, requirement, sense what I'm
> suggesting is early 90's, but I'm also looking for a vehicle to haul a
> kayak. I have owned a Honda CRX for over 10 years. It has been a great car
> just to short to haul my 17foot 'yak. I'm leaning towards a Honda or
Toyota
> wagon (early to mid 90's). They stopped making them a couple of years back
> in favor of SUV (yuk!). I done some checking and there doesn't seem to be
a
> great number of them in the used market, but I think it is the way to go.
> They get very good gas mileage (my CRX gets great almost 50MPG!), They
hare
> a low roof line and plenty of space. Because they are wagons they have
lots
> of room and shouldn't have any trouble hauling a couple of boats.
> Thanks for posting the question it will be great to see what else
> people suggest.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Shawn Baker <shawnkayak_at_yahoo.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Transportation Input Needed
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:13:09 -0800 (PST)
Melissa Reese <melissa_at_bonnyweeboaty.net> wrote:
>I drive an old (1987) Subaru GL wagon (four door), and it works very
well for me. 

My wife drives a 94 Legacy Sedan, non-AWD, non-Turbo, and it's a great
car.

>For a car, it does have very good road clearance, 

And great skid plates and gravel guards, even on the non-AWD models.

>I'm not sure about "ease of repair", as I usually take it to my
trusted local mechanic for the greasy stuff, but the basic maintenance
things like checking fluids, changing tires, etc., is easy enough.

Subaru engineers are brilliant.  The oil drain plug and oil filter are
right up front, and I don't even use a jack/jackstand for changing
oil..heck, you don't even have to lay on your back and stick your head
under the car...I can do it on my knees from in front of the front
bumper.

> My car is in good shape, and it's very reliable, 

Subarus are very well-built vehicles.  Given regular oil changes and
decent maintenance, they'll run well forever.  Given no maintenance,
they'll run like cr*p forever.

I do have a serious gripe with Subaru, though.  Their ergonomics
engineers should all be shot.  Every one of them.  Controls for radios,
wipers, cruise control, rear defrost, heaters, A/C controls, power
locks, power mirrors, and power windows have asinine ergonomics. 
Nothing is where it should be, and nothing works the way you would
expect it to.  And it seems to change from year to year, for those who
upgrade cars biannually, but stay with the same make/model.  They got
too damn creative, and for no reason.  Why is the cup holder in front
of the radio?!  Some will say, "you get used to it", but when it's my
wife's car, and not _my_ daily driver, and we're on a long trip, and
driving through Portland on 4 lanes, and it's raining about a gazillion
inches per minute, and I can't find the controls for the defrost or
rear defog, nor the radio knob to turn it off to concentrate
(thankfully the wipers operate like most Japanese rigs), it's a
legitimate gripe.

Shawn

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:32 PDT