PaddleWise by thread

From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:57:02 -0400
The people I paddle with are all talking about getting the latest 4- 
piece paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable blades. I can  
understand the use of a take-apart for an on-deck spare or if you  
have a tiny little car and can't carry a 1-piece, but 4-piece???

The other big thing in paddles these days is an adjustable ferrule  
that lets you change the length or feather.

What is the appeal of these things? Do people really swap out blades  
all the time? Are they really changing the length and feather? I can  
understand if you are a new paddler and don't know what you like, but  
are these features really useful for an experienced paddler?

I personally make my own paddles, but have always felt that a 1-piece  
will be lighter and stronger as well as being immune to jamming and  
loosening. But it is almost impossible to find a 1-piece paddle  
intended for sea kayaks these days. Stores don't stock them and  
catalogs don't list them. They are typically a special order item.  I  
did special order a wing paddle recently. I got a 1-piece with  
heavier glass blades. It was much cheaper than the full carbon take- 
apart and only barely heavier. One-piece paddles are still easily  
available for whitewater.

My first impression is that manufacturers and dealers are just trying  
to save oversized shipping charges, or maybe it is a way to giving  
the appearance of higher value to support higher retail prices. The  
replaceable blade system is probably a good way to sell more blades  
as people lose or break one and have to buy two to replace it.

Why are people buying these things and why can't you find a good 1- 
piece any more?


Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James <jimtibensky_at_fastmail.fm>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:22:14 -0500
Nick Schade said: The people I paddle with are all talking about getting
the latest 4- piece paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable blades. 
Why are people buying these things and why can't you find a good 1-
piece any more?



Nick,

I only use 1 piece paddles for normal paddling.  But when I ship my
folder on a plane, a four piecer is nice.  The shaft pieces pack into
the roll of my sleeping pad, which a 2 piecer can't, having the blades
attached and all. And a 2 piecer is good on the back deck as a spare,
although I much prefer a single blade canoe paddle for myself.

I love the Mitchell Sea Blade one piece.  Heavy as it is it feels nice
to me.

I don't care much about the feather angle on my paddles - I can switch
from Inuit paddle to 90 degree whitewater or sea kayak paddle to 70
degree sea kayak paddle to canoe paddle with never a missed beat.  I
wouldn't pay for the adjustable ferrule.  But, just as an example of how
some folks think:  The great Danish sprint racer Erik Hansen had a bag
full of paddles for racing.  Each was feathered differently, from 90
degrees to almost zero.  He used a paddle based on wind conditions. 
Tail wind = no feather.  Head wind = 90 degrees.  I wasn't sure what the
in betweens were for.

And, of course, there is the tech weenie that loves new stuff no matter
what the value of it.  I knew a number of whitewater paddlers who had to
have the newest design of paddle and boat as soon as they came out.  But
they couldn't use either boat or paddle to the fullest capabilities
because they spent money on stuff instead of time on technique.


I love a good jeremiad now and then.  Keep up the good work!

Jim Tibensky
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Darryl <Darryl.Johnson_at_sympatico.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:43:41 -0400
> The people I paddle with are all talking about getting the latest 4-
> piece paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable blades. I can 
> understand the use of a take-apart for an on-deck spare or if you 
> have a tiny little car and can't carry a 1-piece, but 4-piece???
> 
> The other big thing in paddles these days is an adjustable ferrule 
> that lets you change the length or feather.
> 
> What is the appeal of these things? Do people really swap out blades 
> all the time? Are they really changing the length and feather? I can 
> understand if you are a new paddler and don't know what you like, but 
> are these features really useful for an experienced paddler?
> 
> I personally make my own paddles, but have always felt that a 1-piece 
> will be lighter and stronger as well as being immune to jamming and 
> loosening. But it is almost impossible to find a 1-piece paddle 
> intended for sea kayaks these days. Stores don't stock them and 
> catalogs don't list them. They are typically a special order item.  I 
> did special order a wing paddle recently. I got a 1-piece with 
> heavier glass blades. It was much cheaper than the full carbon take-
> apart and only barely heavier. One-piece paddles are still easily 
> available for whitewater.
> 
> My first impression is that manufacturers and dealers are just trying 
> to save oversized shipping charges, or maybe it is a way to giving 
> the appearance of higher value to support higher retail prices. The 
> replaceable blade system is probably a good way to sell more blades 
> as people lose or break one and have to buy two to replace it.
> 
> Why are people buying these things and why can't you find a good 1-
> piece any more?
> 
> 
> Nick Schade
> 

I was looking at one of the Lendel 4-piece paddles a while back. All 
broken down, it fit into a rolled bag that looked more like what 
you'd carry a pool cue in. Very slick! As I'm currently planning for 
an extended trip to New Zealand for some paddling this coming winter, 
I was interested in the idea of more conveniently bringing my own 
paddle.

The length adjustment is something I've thought about. Shorter for 
when I'm powering along with a more vertical stroke; longer for when 
I'm just sliding along, looking for wildlife, using a more horizontal 
stroke. On the other hand, I've been getting along relatively well 
with the single paddle that I use now, so...

Feathered paddles seem to bother my wrist, mainly my right one (I'm 
right-handed), so I go unfeathered all the time. I've only tried a 90 
and a 60-degree feather, so perhaps one of the other angles might be 
a compromise I could live with. I don't know that I'd pay extra just 
to be able to try it out though.

I'm a long way from needing different blades. Or at least from 
_knowing_ that I need different blades. Other than the rare short-
distance race to beat someone back to the dock, or a sprint for 
exercise, my paddling is much the same from day to day. I don't know 
what I'd do with different blades, to tell the truth.

But then, I don't know what I'd do with a cell phone or a GPS either. 
Traces of Luddite blood run through my veins, obviously.

-- 
  Darryl
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Derrick A. Mayoleth <derrick_at_kayakwisconsin.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:09:54 -0500
Hi,

I have had a lendal for a couple years now and
have had great luck with it.  The fact that you
can use their key-lock to tighten the shaft gives
you pretty solid feel much like a one piece. (just
don't lose the key)

Mine are carbon fibre. I thought when I bought it
that there would be an advantage in being able to
swap out my beat up blades over time without
buying a new paddle. But they seem to be holding
out pretty well against my abuse and the cost
savings is not really all that much.  I do like
being able to break them down though.  It was sure
convenient when we flew out to California last
year.  I couldn't take my boat, but at least I had
my own paddle.  (yes. . It is a security blanket
thing. . .)

Derrick 
KayakWisconsin.net



> The people I paddle with are all talking about
getting the latest 4- 
> piece paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable
blades... 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:53:37 EDT
Nick,
 
A one piece paddle is a relic! Right up there with my grandpappy's  
muzzleloader over the mantle. ; )
 
Actually, I agree with you that a one piece is a very strong paddle and  once 
a blade design is found that suits ones primary uses, it will arguably last  
longer than a take apart. I thought the Lendal crank was interesting so I  
bought it. I bought the Lendal 4 piece with nylon carbon blades and a full 5 cm  
shorter than my other EP's. I wanted a good rock garden and sea boat surfing  
paddle and chose the Nordkapp blades. A 4 piece paddle such as Lendal's are 
well  made. I need a 4 piece because I fly with paddles at least twice a year. 
The  joint you use an allen wrench on is replaceable.  I had an Aquabound 4  
piece WW paddle that sat under my WW boats float bags as a spare. Before I  
destroyed it, it's joints were loosening up and I was not all that high on it  
after a while.
 
A 2 piece paddle is subject to greater potential damage than a 4 piece in  
the airline's hands. I do not want to start a trip with a hastily purchased  
aluminum Carlysle on my deck and my spare as a primary. I also do not want to  
deal with all the packaging at my destination that protects my equipment.
 
Aside from Lendal's nice blade designs, their interchangability is key.  
Werner's blades are just as good, but AFAIK not interchangeable. My second crank  
purchase was a 210cm (I know, I know, a slave to fashion) with the kinetic  
blades. I do switch them around a bit. I like the Nordkapp blades for their bite 
 and I like the 210cm length. I switched things around and it was my primary 
for  a trip I took a couple months ago where we launched and landed in surf 
every  day. I normally use the kinetic blade with the 210 length, otherwise.
 
Last year I actually broke a tube doing something oafish and when I got  home 
it was a $57 replacement section and not another broken paddle going up on  
the wall.
 
I prefer a 210 now to a 215 so length and feather variability don't matter  
so much to me. However, my buddy bought that feature, for an extra $25 bucks,  
and the 5 cm variability was better for him when the kayak he was in was 3.5  
inches wider and had more freeboard than his home boat.
 
There are 2 issues with the Lendal. You have to shoot freshwater on the  
joint to keep it clean. That's not as maintenance free as a 1 piece. The second  
issue is, *where'd I put that damn key*. I have it lashed permanently in a pfd  
pocket, now.
 
I'm actually surprised you are not making a woodstrip version of your own  
wing blade design. When you turn one of your boats into a sectional and paddle  
someplace you've always wanted to paddle you may find it easier to leave the 
one  piece behind and bring along a 4 piece. 
 
Cheers,
 
Rob G
 
In a message dated 5/19/2005 5:58:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,  
nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com writes:

The  people I paddle with are all talking about getting the latest 4- 
piece  paddle: take-apart shaft with replaceable blades. I can  
understand  the use of a take-apart for an on-deck spare or if you  
have a tiny  little car and can't carry a 1-piece, but 4-piece???

The other big  thing in paddles these days is an adjustable ferrule  
that lets you  change the length or feather.

What is the appeal of these things? Do  people really swap out blades  
all the time? Are they really changing  the length and feather? I can  
understand if you are a new paddler  and don't know what you like, but  
are these features really useful  for an experienced paddler?

I personally make my own paddles, but have  always felt that a 1-piece  
will be lighter and stronger as well as  being immune to jamming and  
loosening. But it is almost impossible  to find a 1-piece paddle  
intended for sea kayaks these days. Stores  don't stock them and  
catalogs don't list them. They are typically a  special order item.  I  
did special order a wing paddle  recently. I got a 1-piece with  
heavier glass blades. It was much  cheaper than the full carbon take- 
apart and only barely heavier.  One-piece paddles are still easily  
available for  whitewater.

My first impression is that manufacturers and dealers are  just trying  
to save oversized shipping charges, or maybe it is a way  to giving  
the appearance of higher value to support higher retail  prices. The  
replaceable blade system is probably a good way to sell  more blades  
as people lose or break one and have to buy two to  replace it.

Why are people buying these things and why can't you find a  good 1- 
piece any more?
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:56:07 -0400
On 19 May 2005 at 8:57, Nick Schade wrote:

> What is the appeal of these things? Do people really swap out blades 
> all the time? Are they really changing the length and feather? I can 
> understand if you are a new paddler and don't know what you like, but 
> are these features really useful for an experienced paddler?

The four piece is good for a spare paddle, since it can be stored 
inside compactly - especially for WW paddlers.  I know of one person 
that actually does have two sets of blades for their Lendal 4 piece.  
Having both big blades and small blades for a long trip is a good 
thing. 

I have a variable feather, variable length paddle.  I do use two 
different feather angles depending on conditions.  I couldn't have it 
pre-drilled for those positions, since the holes would touch.

I originally thought that the variable length would be useful with 
two different width boats, but ended up selling the wider kayak, so I 
only use one length.  It is useful when I loan it, since I can make 
it longer.  However, it is no longer my main paddle - that one is a 
one piece, unfeathered Greenland-style paddle.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Eric M. Winslow <ericwinslow_at_yahoo.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 05:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
How about a  5-piece paddle? I've a Werner with a 10 cm middle section
so that I can go from  215 for the relatively narrow CD Squamish to 225
for the Feathercraft Java. And it breaks down for travelling. No need
for 2 paddles!

Eric Winslow
Wash DC


		
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jim Farrelly <JFarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:13:03 -0400
Eric M. Winslow wrote:

>How about a  5-piece paddle? 
>  
>
Lego should design a paddle out of, like, a few hundred blocks.  You 
could make it into a Euro paddle or Greenland paddle depending on mood.  
And the colors!  Think of the colors! How to make it stay together is 
another issue.

Jim (waiting for the weekend) et al
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John Fereira <jaf30_at_cornell.edu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] What happened to 1-piece paddles?
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 07:42:51 -0400
At 05:13 PM 5/20/2005 -0400, Jim Farrelly wrote:
>Eric M. Winslow wrote:
>
> >How about a  5-piece paddle?
> >
> >
>Lego should design a paddle out of, like, a few hundred blocks.  You
>could make it into a Euro paddle or Greenland paddle depending on mood.
>And the colors!  Think of the colors! How to make it stay together is
>another issue.

With Canadian Naval Duct Tape, of course.
John Fereira
jaf30_at_cornell.edu
Ithaca, NY
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:41 PDT