PaddleWise by thread

From: Mattson, Timothy G <timothy.g.mattson_at_intel.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 20:55:03 -0700
Ahhh come on John, the desire by the ACA to define a Greenland-style
paddling certificate in no way denigrates the ACA.  

There is market driven demand for instruction in Greenland-style paddling.
Maybe you aren't the sort of person who likes to take kayaking classes, but
I for one find them quite valuable.  When I bought my greenland paddle a
couple years ago, I  would have loved some instruction with the paddle.  

There is demand in the market, and the ACA jumped in to provide some
consistency between instructors.  This is clearly in the scope of their
charter --- not some desire to validate their personnel preferences.  

I'm not saying they couldn't have handled this better. Maybe they've jumped
the gun and the style needs to gel more before a course can be defined.
Maybe they should have consulted with Greenlanders before defining the
course.  But to say the course denigrates the ACA is going  a bit too far.

--Tim


-----Original Message-----
From: John C. Winskill
To: Nick Schade
Cc: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Sent: 7/12/99 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific

Nick;

I agree with you.  If the ACA feels compelled to certify Greenland-style
paddling, let them call it something else.  
Another point:  I fail to understand why the ACA wants to do this at
all.  The ACA understood in the light of standing for paddling safety
and consistant standards in the United States makes sense to me.  Their
wanting to certify a technique that is outside of the safety/standards
issue is confusing and really serves in my view to denigrate the ACA. 
It's as though a group of people are wanting to validate their hobby and
thereby themselves.  OK, so they like thier skinny paddles.  It's a
personal preference thing.  There's no reason to build a whole official
certification process around it.  
Who BTW, is certifying the certifiers?  If they feel so passionate about
it why don't they get their training from the source?  Consult the
Greenlanders.  Its not an unreasonable request.

Then again, I'm thinking;  You know, I had the first Romany on the West
Coast, and I'm sure, one of the first in the country.  What say I create
a Romany paddling certification school.  The WSR (Winskill School of
Romany's).  What do you think?  We could begin classes for instructors
this fall.  Any takers?

John Winskill

John Winskill

Nick Schade wrote:
> 
> "Narrow Blade Style"  raises no objections from me. I do think most of
the
> techniques associated with narrow blades are very applicable to wide
> blades, so basing the name on one particular kind of paddle is
limiting.
> But it is a way to teach people who want to use a narrow blade how to
use
> it.
> 
> I am curious as to how Greenlanders paddle, but I would rather learn
it
> from a Greenlander or at the very least someone taught by a
Greenlander. I
> don't think instruction from someone who does not even have permission
from
> a Greenlander would really satisfy my curiosity. If the ACA wants to
> certify Greenland Technique, they should help a group in Greenland
start a
> school for instructors, and then require anyone who wants
certification to
> teach the style go to that school. This would make the instruction
more
> authentic and probably go a long way to releiving the concerns of
native
> Greenlanders.
> 
> Nick
>
************************************************************************
***
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
************************************************************************
***
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: John C. Winskill <johncw_at_narrows.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 11:38:26 -0700
Tim;

When I say 'denigrates the ACA' I mean that the ACA is now taking a
stance that it is wanting to certify aspects of seakayaking that have
little to do with the critical judgement and the skills necessary to be
safe on the water and instead is wanting to stand in a place of
authority over an area of seakayaking that has, in the past (and outside
of Greenland), been relegated to historical and ethno-kayaking buffs . I
also find it denigrating to the developing role of the ACA as the
national "benchmark" of kayaking safety in the US to develop a course
such as this (with certification as the goal) simply because there is a
demand in the market. It makes matters infinately worse that the culture
that created seakayaing and evolved with and because of seakakyaking for
well over a thousand years was not even consulted. 
It speaks at best to a gross insensitivity and at worse to an attempt at
control over an area to which it has no right other than
self-proclaimed. 
The crux of the contoversy is the ACA wanting to grant certification. 
Certification allows the ACA and its instructors to charge applicants
and students for instruction for which it is not qualified to provide. 
Who is certifying the certifiers?  What connection do they have to the
Greenland National Kayak League or to the elders that sanctioned them? 
You say that the need to provide consistancy between their instructors
is the compelling reason for the ACA wanting to establish a
certification process.  This sort of rational can be used to justify
anything.  
If the ACA is willing to compromise its standards in this instance for
the sake of market demands or any other non-compelling reason, it brings
the entire organization into question.

John Winskill

Mattson, Timothy G wrote:
> 
> Ahhh come on John, the desire by the ACA to define a Greenland-style
> paddling certificate in no way denigrates the ACA.
> 
> There is market driven demand for instruction in Greenland-style paddling.
> Maybe you aren't the sort of person who likes to take kayaking classes, but
> I for one find them quite valuable.  When I bought my greenland paddle a
> couple years ago, I  would have loved some instruction with the paddle.
> 
> There is demand in the market, and the ACA jumped in to provide some
> consistency between instructors.  This is clearly in the scope of their
> charter --- not some desire to validate their personnel preferences.
> 
> I'm not saying they couldn't have handled this better. Maybe they've jumped
> the gun and the style needs to gel more before a course can be defined.
> Maybe they should have consulted with Greenlanders before defining the
> course.  But to say the course denigrates the ACA is going  a bit too far.
> 
> --Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John C. Winskill
> To: Nick Schade
> Cc: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Sent: 7/12/99 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific
> 
> Nick;
> 
> I agree with you.  If the ACA feels compelled to certify Greenland-style
> paddling, let them call it something else.
> Another point:  I fail to understand why the ACA wants to do this at
> all.  The ACA understood in the light of standing for paddling safety
> and consistant standards in the United States makes sense to me.  Their
> wanting to certify a technique that is outside of the safety/standards
> issue is confusing and really serves in my view to denigrate the ACA.
> It's as though a group of people are wanting to validate their hobby and
> thereby themselves.  OK, so they like thier skinny paddles.  It's a
> personal preference thing.  There's no reason to build a whole official
> certification process around it.
> Who BTW, is certifying the certifiers?  If they feel so passionate about
> it why don't they get their training from the source?  Consult the
> Greenlanders.  Its not an unreasonable request.
> 
> Then again, I'm thinking;  You know, I had the first Romany on the West
> Coast, and I'm sure, one of the first in the country.  What say I create
> a Romany paddling certification school.  The WSR (Winskill School of
> Romany's).  What do you think?  We could begin classes for instructors
> this fall.  Any takers?
> 
> John Winskill
>
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: David K. Oshins <sedoshins_at_home.com>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] A different perspective on ACA Greenland certification
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 01:10:58 -0400
Hello Paddlewisers,

	I have been, as I have seen it called, a "lurker", for some time now.  In
fact, this is my first time actually getting involved in a discussion, since
I am very new to the awesome sport of Sea Kayaking.  From the first day I
wrapped my hands around that "narrow bladed paddle", I was hooked.  A large
part of what actually drew me into the sport was the vast levels of
so-called "difficulty".  I could take this sport from the lake to the sea.
Up a creek (no pun intended) or down the face a breaking wave.  It could be
a very safe sport or a very dangerous sport.  So, with all these different
levels of difficulty, it could be very easy to get in over your head,
literally.  As a way of gauging my skills and achieving a sense of
confidence, in the water, good, "established" instruction seemed to be the
smartest step for me to take, in my kayaking venture.  I say "established"
because I want to feel that I am learning from someone who knows his or her
stuff.  I don't want some Joe Schmoe (If there is a Joe Schmoe, on this
list, I am sorry for the use of your name) who took a couple of Intro to
Paddling classes one week and then is out there "Teaching" his/her newly
acquired skills to the public, the next week.  I needed to find someone with
credentials.  Anyone can try to teach.  Anyone can gain experience.  Not
everyone can instill confidence.  Fortunately, I was able to meet up with an
individual who possesses a great deal of knowledge about Sea Kayaking.  This
person, of whom I speak, is an ACA Certified Instructor.  In the few courses
I have taken with him, I have left with a wealth of knowledge that has given
me the drive and desire to learn more.  The ACA Fundamentals of Coastal
Kayaking Part One course was awesome and very thorough.  I feel confident
that I am learning the skills necessary to survive and truly enjoy Sea
Kayaking.
	Earlier, I mentioned the "narrow bladed paddle".  Yes, I prefer the
Traditional Greenland Style Paddle.  My interest in Greenland skills was
sparked by its use and the brief sampling of culture I either read about or
saw in videos (Amphibious Man).  The mere fact that the American Canoe
Association is "officially" providing instruction for anyone interested in
Greenland Skills, can and will only add to my need and desire to learn more.
I am not expecting to learn how to speak the native tongue of Greenland.  I
am not expecting to learn of the marriage rites of the Inuit tribe.  If I
wanted to learn that, I would go to the library and I just may as I start to
learn more.  What I am expecting to learn is how to paddle and roll with a
narrow blade, as close to the traditional multi-faceted Greenland Style as
possible.
	I understand that it appears, as stated by some people on this list, that
the very culture of Ancient Greenland is at the risk of exploitation.  I
understand that it appears that their chief export is being taken right from
under their noses.  I can truly sympathize with how they must feel.  On the
other hand, I understand that their culture was presented to this country in
the form of exhibitions.  I understand that the very respected and honored
John Heath, single-handedly, opened the eyes of people everywhere to this
new "Style" of Kayaking by bringing Champions of Greenland over here to show
their skills.  They had to have had the foresight to believe that people
would become interested and want to learn more.  I ask this.  Why didn't
they originally prepare for this possible outcome sooner by establishing
some kind of joint committee with an American organization capable of
reaching the masses?  Without this effort, it appears that smaller
interested groups have been formed by people wanting to mimic and learn
these skills.  As time passed, variations in these skills were developed by
people experimenting in a world that lacked "official" instruction.  The
once unique and sacred "culture" of Greenland has now been stretched and
changed beyond its original boundaries.  People are wanting to learn these
skills. They see a paddle at a show or on a trip and an interest is sparked.
But, where can one go to learn more?  Where can one acquire the instruction
necessary to adequately perform these skills?  Enter the ACA, an
organization of 35,000 members, like any college or school, as the next step
in the evolution of Greenland Skills in the United States.  The ACA saw the
need and met the demand.  I am confident that if I take a course in
Traditional Greenland Skills that is offered by the ACA, it will be thorough
and as complete as necessary.
	As for the Certification process, it would be awesome to learn from an
actual Greenlander who learned from his father, who learned from his father,
who learned from his father,...... . But, I can't afford to go to Greenland
and I certainly can't afford the cost of Instruction to have a Greenlander
flown here for every class I would like to take.  As I see it, the ACA and
its Certified Instructors are not claiming to be from Greenland.  They are
just meeting a need.
	I hope that I have not bored anyone with my opinions and observations.  I
just find it amazing how people can formulate opinions on basically any
topic whether they know anything about it or not.  Granted there is nothing
wrong with expressing one's opinion.  It’s a free country and a free list,
so go right ahead.  Now that I have gotten that of my chest, I think I will
go back into the depths and hang upside-down underwater as I read my e-mail.
Thank you.
	Oh and BTW, does anyone know where I could sign up for classes at the
Winskill School of Romany's?  I am curious about the Romany 16 and I wanted
to take a class before someone suggests that the school consult Nigel Dennis
Kayaks before proceeding.

Dave Oshins
sedoshins_at_home.com

"If one does not like the taste of apples, then one should eat oranges and
not speak badly of all the other apples."

-----Original Message-----
From:	owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
[mailto:owner-paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net] On Behalf Of John C. Winskill
Sent:	Tuesday, July 13, 1999 2:38 PM
To:	Johncw; 'paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net '
Subject:	Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific

Tim;

When I say 'denigrates the ACA' I mean that the ACA is now taking a
stance that it is wanting to certify aspects of seakayaking that have
little to do with the critical judgement and the skills necessary to be
safe on the water and instead is wanting to stand in a place of
authority over an area of seakayaking that has, in the past (and outside
of Greenland), been relegated to historical and ethno-kayaking buffs . I
also find it denigrating to the developing role of the ACA as the
national "benchmark" of kayaking safety in the US to develop a course
such as this (with certification as the goal) simply because there is a
demand in the market. It makes matters infinately worse that the culture
that created seakayaing and evolved with and because of seakakyaking for
well over a thousand years was not even consulted.
It speaks at best to a gross insensitivity and at worse to an attempt at
control over an area to which it has no right other than
self-proclaimed.
The crux of the contoversy is the ACA wanting to grant certification.
Certification allows the ACA and its instructors to charge applicants
and students for instruction for which it is not qualified to provide.
Who is certifying the certifiers?  What connection do they have to the
Greenland National Kayak League or to the elders that sanctioned them?
You say that the need to provide consistancy between their instructors
is the compelling reason for the ACA wanting to establish a
certification process.  This sort of rational can be used to justify
anything.
If the ACA is willing to compromise its standards in this instance for
the sake of market demands or any other non-compelling reason, it brings
the entire organization into question.

John Winskill

Mattson, Timothy G wrote:
>
> Ahhh come on John, the desire by the ACA to define a Greenland-style
> paddling certificate in no way denigrates the ACA.
>
> There is market driven demand for instruction in Greenland-style paddling.
> Maybe you aren't the sort of person who likes to take kayaking classes,
but
> I for one find them quite valuable.  When I bought my greenland paddle a
> couple years ago, I  would have loved some instruction with the paddle.
>
> There is demand in the market, and the ACA jumped in to provide some
> consistency between instructors.  This is clearly in the scope of their
> charter --- not some desire to validate their personnel preferences.
>
> I'm not saying they couldn't have handled this better. Maybe they've
jumped
> the gun and the style needs to gel more before a course can be defined.
> Maybe they should have consulted with Greenlanders before defining the
> course.  But to say the course denigrates the ACA is going  a bit too far.
>
> --Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John C. Winskill
> To: Nick Schade
> Cc: paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
> Sent: 7/12/99 12:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certific
>
> Nick;
>
> I agree with you.  If the ACA feels compelled to certify Greenland-style
> paddling, let them call it something else.
> Another point:  I fail to understand why the ACA wants to do this at
> all.  The ACA understood in the light of standing for paddling safety
> and consistant standards in the United States makes sense to me.  Their
> wanting to certify a technique that is outside of the safety/standards
> issue is confusing and really serves in my view to denigrate the ACA.
> It's as though a group of people are wanting to validate their hobby and
> thereby themselves.  OK, so they like thier skinny paddles.  It's a
> personal preference thing.  There's no reason to build a whole official
> certification process around it.
> Who BTW, is certifying the certifiers?  If they feel so passionate about
> it why don't they get their training from the source?  Consult the
> Greenlanders.  Its not an unreasonable request.
>
> Then again, I'm thinking;  You know, I had the first Romany on the West
> Coast, and I'm sure, one of the first in the country.  What say I create
> a Romany paddling certification school.  The WSR (Winskill School of
> Romany's).  What do you think?  We could begin classes for instructors
> this fall.  Any takers?
>
> John Winskill
>
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] ACA Greenland certification
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 02:14:33 -0700
Winters wrote:

> Tim:
> 
> When I say 'denigrates the ACA' I mean that the ACA is now taking a
> stance that it is wanting to certify aspects of seakayaking that have
> little to do with the critical judgement and the skills necessary to be
> safe on the water and instead is wanting to stand in a place of
> authority over an area of seakayaking that has, in the past (and outside
> of Greenland), been relegated to historical and ethno-kayaking buffs.  I
> also find it denigrating to the developing role of the ACA as the
> national "benchmark" of kayaking safety in the US to develop a course
> such as this (with certification as the goal) simply because there is a
> demand in the market. It makes matters infinitely worse that the culture
> that created seakayaking and evolved with and because of seakayaking for
> well over a thousand years was not even consulted.
>
> It speaks at best to a gross insensitivity and at worst to an attempt at
> control over an area to which it has no right other than self-proclaimed.
>
> The crux of the contoversy is the ACA wanting to grant certification.
> Certification allows the ACA and its instructors to charge applicants
> and students for instruction for which it is not qualified to provide.
> Who is certifying the certifiers?  What connection do they have to the
> Greenland National Kayak League or to the elders that sanctioned them?
> You say that the need to provide consistency between their instructors
> is the compelling reason for the ACA wanting to establish a certification
> process.  This sort of rationale can be used to justify anything.
>
> If the ACA is willing to compromise its standards in this instance for
> the sake of market demands or any other non-compelling reason, it brings
> the entire organization into question.

I think Winters has the high ground on this one, though I understand where Tim
Mattson is coming from.

If the ACA put up a certification process for "surf kayaking" it would not
bother me in the slightest.  As a former board/body surfer, I would not feel
my huarache sandel culture to be threatened. <grin>  

How would I decide the certification was valid?  By whether or not the
instructors could themselves handle surf, and whether or not they were
effective in getting their students to learn safe techniques for kayak
surfing.

Surf kayakers do not have an "indigenous people status" to confuse the issues.

Greenlanders (an oxymoron we use to refer to the indigenous peoples of the
subcontinent) do have that status, and deserve respect for their culture, in
the same way the Hopi, Navajo, Tlingit (etc.) do.

That's the part of this that bothers me.

If the ACA wanted to offer instruction on use of skinny paddles *and called it
that,* I'd have no problem with it.  I'd evaluate the effectiveness of the
certification, just as I would for surf kayaking, and be done with it.  It is
the obvious exploitation of traditional aspects of an indigenous people's
culture that is out of place.

Would we endorse certification in Hopi sand painting if taught by
nontraditional folks in a Club Med setting?  Hope not.  Perhaps the ACA's
foray into ethnic paddling will die for lack of interest.

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
A pollyanna tonight.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Julio MacWilliams <juliom_at_cisco.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 12:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Wrong John, that was John C. Winskill, not John Winters, please...
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Winters wrote:
> 
> > Tim:
> > 
> > When I say 'denigrates the ACA' I mean that the ACA is now taking a
> 
> -- 
> Dave Kruger
> Astoria, OR
> A pollyanna tonight.

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: 735769 <735769_at_ican.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 15:43:36 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: Julio MacWilliams <juliom_at_cisco.com>
To: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
Cc: PaddleWise_at_lists.intelenet.net <PaddleWise_at_lists.intelenet.net>
Date: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 3:31 PM
Subject: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE


>Wrong John, that was John C. Winskill, not John Winters, please...
>                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Thanks Julio. I thought maybe there was some other Winters on the list. I
would never denigrate the ACA.

Cheers,
John Winters
Redwing Designs
Web site address, http://home.ican.net/~735769

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <dkruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 14:45:07 -0700
-----Original Message-----
> From: Julio MacWilliams 

> Subject: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE
> 
> >Wrong John, that was John C. Winskill, not John Winters, please...
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
My error, Julio.  My apologies to all.  

-- 
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Please DO NOT MISQUOTE
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:29:01 -0700
John Winters wrote:>
>Thanks Julio. I thought maybe there was some other Winters on the list. I
>would never denigrate the ACA.


I don't blame you. I denigrated them once and they were writing letters to
the press  labeling me a "Fascist" and a "West Coast paddler" for years
afterward. ANorAK which claimed to not edit submissions even knuckled under
and refused to print my reply to several ACA attacks I had ignored earlier
and at the same time forwarded my letters to the ACA for immediate rebutal
while not informing me of ACA letters attaking me until they were in print.
Maybe it was my pointing out that there can be Fascist organizations but no
individual like myself is a Fascist unless he belongs to one of them and by
impuning my motives they were only revealing their own through projection.
One ACA certifier even told one friend lately that she had to get a shorter
paddle before they would certify her. I suppose I should encourage this
nonsense as I'd sell more paddles. I get the feeling they are really trying
to promote kayaks racing technique to train future Olympians under the guise
of "Sea Kayaking" instruction. My advice is to look for an instructor with a
good reputaion as a teacher and while ACA certification is certainly a
negative it doesn't automatically mean that the instructor is just a boy
scout with a new merit badge it should be taken as a warning to look into
that instructors reputation more closely. What with what they put me
through, I'll certainly think twice before denigrating them again.;~{}

Matt Broze
http://www.marinerkayaks.com



***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List
Submissions:     paddlewise_at_lists.intelenet.net
Subscriptions:   paddlewise-request_at_lists.intelenet.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:00 PDT