PaddleWise by thread

From: Richard <rmagill9_at_netscape.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] 19ft Sea Lion Skeptics
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:35:22 -0400
I just have one last question reguarding all you Sea Lion Skeptics. . . 
 If I were going to make up something to tell the Paddlewise community, 
why in the hell would I not have come up with something much more 
interesting to lie about?  I promise you, if I ever try to "yank your 
chain" it will be about my  circumnavigation of Greenland, or  my solo 
crossing of the Pacific. . .  not about the existance of an old $150.00 
boat, that isn't even mine.

Thx  Rich.

P.S.  Just so you know , the mystery is solved.  I haven't inspected it 
myself, but my friend tells me that there are two seems across the width 
of the boat just fore and aft of the seat indicating a home made stretch 
job.  So yes, the 19ft Sea Lion does exist, and no it wasn't factory.


-- 
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. 
Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop_at_Netscape! 
http://shopnow.netscape.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gerald Foodman <klagjf_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:13:53 -0700
I have been thinking about the wing and wonder if the following makes sense.

First a note on efficiency, which by
definition is the amount of energy loss, between the place you put energy in
and the place you take it out.  If you imagine a perfectly vertical paddle,
drawn straight back parallel to the boat, then, BETWEEN THE BLADE AND THE
BOAT'S FORWARD MOTION, there is no energy loss at all, INDEPENDENT OF THE
SHAPE OF THE BLADE.  (100% efficiency.)  This is because all the work you do
on the paddle goes into moving the boat forward.  The paddle could be
square, or have holes in it and efficiency is still 100%.  The paddle is
just generating drag and changing the drag coefficient has no effect energy
loss between the blade and forward motion.

However, it can have a great effect on efficiency between the energy the
paddler expends and the energy transferred to the boat.  This distinction of
where the losses occur is crucial.

In practice the paddle is not vertical, nor does it move straight back.  The
wing stroke uses arms that are essentially locked through the power phase,
causing the paddle to naturally move outward as well as back, generating
both lift and drag in the same direction.  This reduces the energy loss
between the energy expended by the paddler and that received by the boat.

Changing the size of the wing blade, or length of the paddle changes the
gear ratio, just as for the conventional paddle, and should be chosen for
the best efficiency of the particular paddler and the particular
distance/speed he is racing.  The paddler is a motor, and like any motor, is
most efficient at a particular speed, which is generally not the speed for
maximum torque.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 13:40:24 -0400
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 11:13  AM, Gerald Foodman wrote:

> I have been thinking about the wing and wonder if the following makes 
> sense.
>
> First a note on efficiency, which by
> definition is the amount of energy loss, between the place you put 
> energy in
> and the place you take it out.  If you imagine a perfectly vertical 
> paddle,
> drawn straight back parallel to the boat, then, BETWEEN THE BLADE AND 
> THE
> BOAT'S FORWARD MOTION, there is no energy loss at all, INDEPENDENT OF 
> THE
> SHAPE OF THE BLADE.  (100% efficiency.)  This is because all the work 
> you do
> on the paddle goes into moving the boat forward.  The paddle could be
> square, or have holes in it and efficiency is still 100%.  The paddle 
> is
> just generating drag and changing the drag coefficient has no effect 
> energy
> loss between the blade and forward motion.

You are mistaking drag (a force) for energy. While it is true that for 
every Newton or pound of force generated by the paddler a equal and 
opposite unit of force is applied to the paddle by the water. All the 
force generated by the paddle is indeed transfer to the boat to make it 
move. This does not mean that all the energy is transferred without 
loss. The surest way to verify this is to look at the water. If there 
is any sign that the water moves at all due to the paddle, you must 
assume that there has been energy added water by the paddle. Moving 
water indicates kinetic energy in the water that could have been 
kinetic energy for the kayak. If there is energy in the water from the 
paddle that could have gone towards moving the boat, you must assume 
that the paddle is not 100% efficient. There is no such thing as a 100% 
efficient paddle. This is true regardless of the orientation of the 
blade or its direction of motion.
>
> Changing the size of the wing blade, or length of the paddle changes 
> the
> gear ratio, just as for the conventional paddle, and should be chosen 
> for
> the best efficiency of the particular paddler and the particular
> distance/speed he is racing.  The paddler is a motor, and like any 
> motor, is
> most efficient at a particular speed, which is generally not the speed 
> for
> maximum torque.
>

Changing the size of the blade does not change the gear ratio. The 
"gear ratio" is only related to the length of the paddle. Changing the 
size of the blade changes the speed at which it moves through the 
water, in other words it changes its efficiency. This is more analogous 
to having a bicycle chain skip or jump on the gears or having the gear 
rotate slightly relative to the peddle. Changing the blade size does 
effect the perceived gear ratio because for a given cadence it will 
take less force, and for a given force it will require a higher cadence.

There are good reasons why people don't use huge blades on their 
paddle, but everything else being equal, smaller blade area means lower 
efficiency. There are practical reasons like a paddle with 4' x 8' 
blades would be hard to fit in the car, would be heavy and would just 
be awkward to swing around. You need to be able to get a paddle in and 
out of the water fairly easily and the physical construction of humans 
place certain limits on what is practical and comfortable. And 
diminishing returns means that at some point the added efficiency just 
isn't worth the other problems which come with large size.  The right 
balance of overall efficiency of the paddle and comfort for a given 
paddler will effect the optimum size for the paddler.
Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Edelman <mje_at_spamcop.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 17:19:31 -0400
Nick wrote:

> Changing the size of the blade does not change the gear ratio. The 
> "gear ratio" is only related to the length of the paddle. Changing the 
> size of the blade changes the speed at which it moves through the 
> water, in other words it changes its efficiency. This is more analogous 
> to having a bicycle chain skip or jump on the gears or having the gear 
> rotate slightly relative to the peddle. Changing the blade size does 
> effect the perceived gear ratio because for a given cadence it will 
> take less force, and for a given force it will require a higher cadence.

Didn't we thrash this to death last year? ;-) There's a conceptual 
confusion between the notions of biomechanical efficiency (translating 
muscle power into propulsion), paddle "efficiency" (translating swept 
are into propulsion) and mechanical advantage (paddle as lever).

I think I noted back then that the "efficiency" of coupling the paddle 
to the water does *not* equate to efficiency in converting muscle power 
to propulsion (biomechanical efficiency). Two different things. A small 
blade doesn't move as much water with each stroke as does a large blade, 
but at the same time, it doesn't require as much energy input to move 
through the water.

So yes, enlarging the blade has the same end result as does lengthening 
the paddle: It increases *both* the energy in and propulsion out for a 
given swept area, even though it accomplishes it in a different way. And 
both are indeed similar to changing gears on the bike. Shrink the blade 
or shorten the arm, and you increase the rate to get the same propulsive 
force over time.

And that brings us to biomechanical efficiency. By experimenting with 
the tradeoff between blade size/paddle length and rate, you can find the 
optimum combination for you to transfer maximum power *over time*.

-- mike
  -------------------------
  Michael Edelman
  medelman_at_ameritech.net
  http://www.foldingkayaks.org
  http://www.findascope.com

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gordon Snapp <grsnapp_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:21:59 -0500
> And that brings us to biomechanical efficiency. By experimenting with
> the tradeoff between blade size/paddle length and rate, you can find the
> optimum combination for you to transfer maximum power *over time*.
>
> -- mike

This seems to be sound advice, except for those of us who don't have easy
access to a wide range of paddles with different lengths, blade size, shape,
etc.  In my household we have a) two short "recreational" paddles we bought
with our Scramblers - one piece, unfeathered, heavy as all get out; b) a
long (240cm?) $30 paddle from Campmor; and c) a long, large carbon fiber
paddle from Whetstone.  Based on that sample the Whetstone is wonderful and
I like it very much.

But now I want to buy a paddle for my wife.  I'm 6'4", she's 5'8".  I've
never had a problem with repetitive stress injuries; she has fibromyalgia
and often endures painful flareups of her hands, wrists, and forearms.

I want to buy her a light paddle that places minimal stress on her body.
However, she's also quite strong, and I don't want to buy her something too
"wimpy" and have her wish she had something a little more powerful.

I doubt if we'll be able to find a range of paddles to try; she's going to
have a hard time fitting paddling into her busy life.  I'm hoping we can
find the perfect paddle based on people's advice and the research I can do,
buy it, and go paddling.

Therefore, I'm interested in all of these theoretical discussions about
paddles, efficiency, etc., as well as their practical applications.  Keep
'em coming.

Anyone have any advice for my wife and I?


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dee Lutz <egb_at_dur.mindspring.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:12:23 -0400
> But now I want to buy a paddle for my wife.  I'm 6'4", she's 5'8".  I've
> never had a problem with repetitive stress injuries; she has fibromyalgia
> and often endures painful flareups of her hands, wrists, and forearms.
> 
> I want to buy her a light paddle that places minimal stress on her body.
> However, she's also quite strong, and I don't want to buy her something too
> "wimpy" and have her wish she had something a little more powerful.

Gordon:  I'm very happy with my carbon fiber AT (Adventure Technology)
paddle.  It's bent shaft, which I think is the most important feature for
somebody with wrist or arm injuries.  It's great for bracing and rolling.
Very smooth in the water.  I really like a short paddle - mine is 218, and
I'd really prefer 216.  I'm shorter than your wife (5'5") but I think you
get more control with a shorter paddle.  There web page is:
http://www.atpaddle.com/
This ain't no "wimpy" paddle!

Good luck,

Dee

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Steve Cramer <cramersec_at_charter.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:46:01 -0400
Gordon Snapp wrote:
> 
> But now I want to buy a paddle for my wife.  I'm 6'4", she's 5'8".  I've
> never had a problem with repetitive stress injuries; she has fibromyalgia
> and often endures painful flareups of her hands, wrists, and forearms.
> 
> I want to buy her a light paddle that places minimal stress on her body.
> However, she's also quite strong, and I don't want to buy her something too
> "wimpy" and have her wish she had something a little more powerful.

There's a high tech organic matrix material you should look at. It's 
called "wood." Cricket makes paddles from it. I love mine.

-- 
Steve Cramer
Athens, GA

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: sluf <KMKenney_at_prodigy.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:53:18 -0400
"But now I want to buy a paddle for my wife.  she has fibromyalgia
and often endures painful flareups of her hands, wrists, and forearms.

I want to buy her a light paddle that places minimal stress on her body.
However, she's also quite strong, and I don't want to buy her something
too
"wimpy" and have her wish she had something a little more powerful."

Hi all,
 Lots of great paddles out there, but I can tell you that I find myself
coming back to my wooden Greenland paddle again and again. A couple of
points about it worth mentioning, especially in regards to your query:

1. Paddle is by design unfeathered, thus no chance of rotational
injuries from the necessary paddle twist of feathered ones.
2. Paddle is very light weight, and as there are no mass points on each
end, the throw weight is very easy to manage.
3. I found it extremely easy to learn to paddle using it, no real
learning curve to speak of.
4. I find it to be by far the easiest on my wrist and hands, yet if I
want to move out, I can accelerate and move quickly using it, with no
trouble (I hit 5.9 MPH today and held it for several minutes with no
problem).
5. Because of it's design (it's basically an uncambered, high aspect
ratio wing) how much effort you want to put into paddling it is up to
you-- paddle a bit harder and with higher RPM if you're in a hurry,
paddle with less force and lower RPM if you want to relax. (I know that
sounds like any other paddle, but anyone who's tried a Greenland paddle
will know what I mean by this.)

Mine is a wooden Feathercraft (not sure who really makes it) but I know
there are several good makers out there, as well as plenty of tutorials
on how to make your own. I'm just not handy enough with woodworking
tools, but it doesn't sound hard to make one for someone with a little
more skill than I.

OK, my 2 cents worth.
OBTW, many Kayak shops will let you try different paddles on a sort of
test drive basis, just ask around.

R/
Kevin


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 19:12:51 +1000
Kevin wrote: -
> 1. Paddle is by design unfeathered,
> thus no chance of rotational injuries
> from the necessary paddle twist of
> feathered ones.

G'Day Kevin and Paddlewise,

I'm grateful to a woman called Linda Lehman who showed us that it was
unnecessary to use the 'wrist cocking' (paddle twist) even with a feathered
paddle. Its awkward to start learning but well worth it. It would be good to
see the idea of NOT rotating your wrist when paddling more widely
advertised.

All the best, PeterO


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 22:28:40 -0400
On 6 Jun 2003 at 17:21, Gordon Snapp wrote:

> But now I want to buy a paddle for my wife.  I'm 6'4", she's 5'8". 
> I've never had a problem with repetitive stress injuries; she has
> fibromyalgia and often endures painful flareups of her hands, wrists,
> and forearms.

What little I know of fibromyalgia (based on a recent web search) 
suggests that a paddle design can neither cause nor reduce the pain.  
However, a good paddle can reduce the likelyhood of a problem that is 
unknown becoming a apparent, so getting a good one is probably a good 
idea.  

She'll want a short paddle, possibly shorter than many kayak shops 
would recommend.  Around here, they still recommend 230-240 cm for 
me, but I paddle with a 220 and wish I'd got a 215.  She'd want 
possibly a 210 or even 200 - kayak size will be a factor so try 
before you buy.   It's only too short if she can't get it into the 
water with all her favourite strokes.

A carbon fibre paddle is pricey, but she'd appreciate the light 
weight.  Similarly, a bent shaft will put less stress on her wrists.  
I'd recommend a variable feather so she can find a feather angle that 
doesn't require a lot of wrist flex, unless she has a prior 
preference for unfeathered.

The other option that I'd have to recommend is a Greenland style 
paddle.  You can make one for about $20 out of a premium quality 2x4. 
This will produce a paddle that's a tad less efficient but easy on 
the body.  When I go out for a long day's paddle with mine, I end up 
with sore muscles rather than sore joints.  You can buy one, but they 
tend to be quite pricey.  There's even a carbon fibre version from 
Superior Kayaks that's quite light ($$).

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: PeterO <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 08:09:34 +1000
Gerald Wrote: -
>In practice the paddle is not vertical,
>nor does it move straight back.  The
>wing stroke uses arms that are essentially
>locked through the power phase, causing
>the paddle to naturally move outward as
>well as back, generating both lift and
>drag in the same direction.  This reduces
>the energy loss between the energy expended
>by the paddler and that received by the boat.

Nick Shade wrote: -
>Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the
>water that could have been kinetic energy for
>the kayak.

G'Day Gerald,

I'm guessing that a wing stroke is one in which the paddle is at a low angle
to the water compared with the vertical or high angle often used when racing
kayaks.

When I paddle with a high angle, aiming to keep the paddle near the side of
the boat throughout the stroke, it feels much less exhausting than using a
low angle. This may have nothing to do with efficiency and be a
biomechanical effect, due to optimal matching of muscle, tendons and
skeleton to stroke. However, it might also be that the low angle stroke is
moving water at right angles to the boat and dissipatng energy, in the water
and in the human body, that is not associated with forward movement?

Arguably a low angle stroke is less efficient than using a high angle.

All the best, PeterO


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Edelman <mje_at_spamcop.net>
subject: RE: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 23:34:20 -0400
Nick Shade wrote: -

>Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the
>water that could have been kinetic energy for
>the kayak.

Not necessarily.  Water moving in the opposite direction of the movement 
of the kayak indicates that energy was transferred to the kayak. We had 
a lot of discussion some time ago about votex shedding off the blade and 
how that contributes to the lift generated by the paddle. And so on.

-- mike
  -------------------------
  Michael Edelman
  medelman_at_ameritech.net
  http://www.foldingkayaks.org
  http://www.findascope.com

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 19:56:21 -0400
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 11:34  PM, Michael Edelman wrote:

> Nick Shade wrote: -
>
>> Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the
>> water that could have been kinetic energy for
>> the kayak.
>
> Not necessarily.  Water moving in the opposite direction of the 
> movement of the kayak indicates that energy was transferred to the 
> kayak. We had a lot of discussion some time ago about votex shedding 
> off the blade and how that contributes to the lift generated by the 
> paddle. And so on.

Yes, absolutely. Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient 
system would have been kayak motion. In real life water motion is 
inevitable consequence of applying propulsive force against a fluid, 
but that does not mean it is not lost energy. Vortex shedding may add 
to lift, but the vortex is still lost energy. This not to say that a 
paddle that creates a vortex is not more efficient than one that 
somehow avoids making the vortex, but lost energy is lost energy 
regardless of the form it takes. 100% efficiency is only possible when 
pushing against an absolutely stiff object of infinite mass, for our 
purposes the solid ground of the earth is a reasonable approximation. 
Poling your kayak would be as close to 100% efficient as is possible.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gerald Foodman <klagjf_at_worldnet.att.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 19:05:59 -0700
Nick,
If the paddle were to be drawn straight back with the blade normal to the
velocity, then the force applied by the hand depends on CD, paddle area and
velocity.  The work done by the hand then also depends on CD, area and
velocity.  Now if you had two different paddles stroked identically, working
at the same velocity, with the same product of CD and area, would they
necessarily be equally efficient?  Even though the flow pattern around each
would be different.

Jerry

> > Nick Shade wrote: -
> Yes, absolutely. Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient
> system would have been kayak motion. In real life water motion is
> inevitable consequence of applying propulsive force against a fluid,
> but that does not mean it is not lost energy. Vortex shedding may add
> to lift, but the vortex is still lost energy. This not to say that a
> paddle that creates a vortex is not more efficient than one that
> somehow avoids making the vortex, but lost energy is lost energy
> regardless of the form it takes. 100% efficiency is only possible when
> pushing against an absolutely stiff object of infinite mass, for our
> purposes the solid ground of the earth is a reasonable approximation.
> Poling your kayak would be as close to 100% efficient as is possible.


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 10:12:33 -0400
Work is defined as a change in energy. If you measure the work done by 
your hand and you have all the parameters of your paddle matched such 
that they multiply together right it is absolutely possible to make the 
work done by your hand match with substantially different paddles. But 
remember that the work done by your hand is not the same thing as the 
work done on your boat.

  Imagine paddling one boat in free water, while paddling another which 
is tied to shore. You should be able to make two paddle, one for the 
free boat and one for the tied boat which when you paddle feel the 
same. The one for the tied boat will probably be very small, so it 
doesn't feel that hard to pull when the boat isn't moving. You will be 
able to pull this paddle and your hand will be doing work, but no work 
will be done on the kayak because it is tied in place such that its 
energy can not change. With no change in energy there is no work done 
to it. All the work you are doing with your hand is going into the 
water.

In an ideal system all the work you do with your hand would transfer 
directly into work done to the boat. In a real system some of the work 
is inevitably dumped into the water. The goal is to find a paddle and a 
technique which reduces the the amount of work done to the water so 
most of it can go to your boat.

On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:05  PM, Gerald Foodman wrote:

> Nick,
> If the paddle were to be drawn straight back with the blade normal to 
> the
> velocity, then the force applied by the hand depends on CD, paddle 
> area and
> velocity.  The work done by the hand then also depends on CD, area and
> velocity.  Now if you had two different paddles stroked identically, 
> working
> at the same velocity, with the same product of CD and area, would they
> necessarily be equally efficient?  Even though the flow pattern around 
> each
> would be different.
Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Edelman <mje_at_spamcop.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 21:50:32 -0400
Nick Shade wrote: -
>>> Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the
>>> water that could have been kinetic energy for
>>> the kayak.
> 
  I replied:
>> Not necessarily.  Water moving in the opposite direction of the 
>> movement of the kayak indicates that energy was transferred to the 
>> kayak. We had a lot of discussion some time ago about votex shedding 
>> off the blade and how that contributes to the lift generated by the 
>> paddle. And so on.
> 
  Nick replied:
> Yes, absolutely. Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient 
> system would have been kayak motion. In real life water motion is 
> inevitable consequence of applying propulsive force against a fluid, 
> but that does not mean it is not lost energy. Vortex shedding may add 
> to lift, but the vortex is still lost energy. This not to say that a 
> paddle that creates a vortex is not more efficient than one that 
> somehow avoids making the vortex, but lost energy is lost energy 
> regardless of the form it takes. 100% efficiency is only possible when 
> pushing against an absolutely stiff object of infinite mass, for our 
> purposes the solid ground of the earth is a reasonable approximation. 
> Poling your kayak would be as close to 100% efficient as is possible.

You say "Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient system 
would have been kayak motion", but as you note, water in not a perfectly 
rigid medium. The only way you can generate motion with a paddle is to 
move water backwards. Water moving in the opposite direction to the 
kayak's travel indicates energy that was transferred to the kayak. 
Newton's second law.

Vorticies don't necessarily indicate wasted energy either. We talk about 
vortices "shedding" but the vorticies indicate a low pressure zone 
behind the paddle which generates lift. If you had perfectly laminar 
flow around the paddle you'd have no lift, and hence no propulsion.

-- mike
  -------------------------
  Michael Edelman
  medelman_at_ameritech.net
  http://www.foldingkayaks.org
  http://www.findascope.com

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 09:52:07 -0400
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 09:50  PM, Michael Edelman wrote:

> Nick Shade wrote: -
>>>> Moving water indicates kinetic energy in the
>>>> water that could have been kinetic energy for
>>>> the kayak.
>  I replied:
>>> Not necessarily.  Water moving in the opposite direction of the 
>>> movement of the kayak indicates that energy was transferred to the 
>>> kayak. We had a lot of discussion some time ago about votex shedding 
>>> off the blade and how that contributes to the lift generated by the 
>>> paddle. And so on.
>  Nick replied:
>> Yes, absolutely. Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient 
>> system would have been kayak motion. In real life water motion is 
>> inevitable consequence of applying propulsive force against a fluid, 
>> but that does not mean it is not lost energy. Vortex shedding may add 
>> to lift, but the vortex is still lost energy. This not to say that a 
>> paddle that creates a vortex is not more efficient than one that 
>> somehow avoids making the vortex, but lost energy is lost energy 
>> regardless of the form it takes. 100% efficiency is only possible 
>> when pushing against an absolutely stiff object of infinite mass, for 
>> our purposes the solid ground of the earth is a reasonable 
>> approximation. Poling your kayak would be as close to 100% efficient 
>> as is possible.
>
> You say "Any water motion is energy that in a 100% efficient system 
> would have been kayak motion", but as you note, water in not a 
> perfectly rigid medium. The only way you can generate motion with a 
> paddle is to move water backwards. Water moving in the opposite 
> direction to the kayak's travel indicates energy that was transferred 
> to the kayak. Newton's second law.
>
> Vorticies don't necessarily indicate wasted energy either. We talk 
> about vortices "shedding" but the vorticies indicate a low pressure 
> zone behind the paddle which generates lift. If you had perfectly 
> laminar flow around the paddle you'd have no lift, and hence no 
> propulsion.


You are confusing a "necessary" process with an "efficient" process. 
Consider the internal combustion engine. When you car engine is cold it 
runs inefficiently. It needs to heat up before it really runs well. But 
the biggest source of inefficiency in a car engine is the fact that 
much of the energy that is contained in the gas is turn into heat. The 
engine creates so much heat that you actually need a radiator to get 
rid of the excess. That heat is energy that could have made your car go 
farther or faster. However, if you were successful in keeping the 
engine stone cold it would never run as efficiently as it could. It is 
necessary for the efficient running of the engine that it heat up, and 
it is also true that the most efficient source of that heat is from the 
prior combustion of fuel in the engine, but that by-no-means implies 
that the heat the engine produces is not lost energy and thus 
inefficient. A source of inefficiency may be harnessed to improve 
efficiency. But that doesn't eliminate the inefficiency, it just limits 
it.

It is inevitable and necessary that you move water to propel a boat. It 
is not a contradiction that the most efficient way to propel the boat 
has built in inefficiency. If you take a snap shot of the vortex system 
made by a paddle and analyze it you must see that there is energy in 
that vortex system due to the kinetic energy of the water. That energy 
had to come from somewhere. You and your breakfast of warm beer and 
cold pizza is the source of that energy. If you are creating energy 
systems outside of adding to the energy of the boat itself, those 
energy systems are inefficiencies.

The goal is to minimize the non-kayak-forward-motion-energy-systems. 
The vortex contributes to creating a forward force on the kayak, it 
does this by expending a small amount of energy into the water. You 
improve efficiency by reducing the amount of energy expended to create 
that force. Just because it is necessary that you expend this energy 
does not mean it is not lost energy and thus a source of inefficiency. 
Some inefficiency is necessary, the goal is to limit it.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 09:09:50 -0700
Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com> wrote:

>> Work is defined as a change in energy. If you measure the work done by
your hand and you have all the parameters of your paddle matched such
that they multiply together right it is absolutely possible to make the
work done by your hand match with substantially different paddles. But
remember that the work done by your hand is not the same thing as the
work done on your boat. >>

Nick, a small correction:  Classically, work is defined as the force applied
multiplied by the distance through which the force is applied ( W = f x d),
not a change in energy.  The change in energy in the paddler arm/back system
is not all directed at accomplishing work.  Some goes into generating
turbulence in the water ("vortices") which ultimately ends up heating up the
water a bit.  (The water at the bottom of Niagara Falls is warmer by a tiny
fraction of a degree because of the "stirring" achieved by the fall and
subsequent random mixing of the water.)

Consequently, if one is interested in determining efficiency in the
paddler/boat/water system, he/she has to be careful to delineate what is
doing work on what.  The paddler does work on the paddle (pushing it
rearward).  The paddle does work on the water (pushing it rearward).  And, in
turn, the paddler's body does work on the boat, pushing it forward.  How much
work gets done on the boat, from all the thrashing of the paddle, is the key.

I believe the original thesis was whether "wing" paddles were more efficient
than traditional Euro paddles (ones with an oval-shaped  blade on the end of
a shaft).  Whether a low pressure area is created behind the paddle as it
slices through the water may be moot if other features of paddle passage
through water are less efficient.

I think, to advance the cause, we need __data__ to sort out what's going on
in this system.  It is too complex to discuss piecemeal or to solve by
gedanken analysis.  Albeit, it has been fun to scan what you guys have been
writing.

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gordon Snapp <grsnapp_at_charter.net>
subject: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:12:16 -0500
Okay, I've been reading the thread on wing paddles.  I've found the
discussion very interesting regarding energy expended, work done,
efficiency, etc.  I guess that's what engineers and physicists deal with,
huh?  (and boat designers and paddlers.)

But I have to admit, I don't think I know exactly what a wing paddle is.
Could someone give a definition?  Thanks!


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kork4_at_cluemail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:42:09 -0500
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:12:16 -0500, "Gordon Snapp"
<grsnapp_at_charter.net> said:
> Okay, I've been reading the thread on wing paddles.  I've found the
> discussion very interesting regarding energy expended, work done,
> efficiency, etc.  I guess that's what engineers and physicists deal
> with, huh?  (and boat designers and paddlers.)
>
> But I have to admit, I don't think I know exactly what a wing paddle
> is. Could someone give a definition?  Thanks!

A wing or propeller paddle is shaped more like an airplane propeller.
The top of the blade is curved back and the blade itself is cupped and
has a twist in it.  The blade is also offset from shaft of the paddle.

There are some good movies of olympic paddlers using wing paddles on Fred
Mechini's page http://pluto.njcc.com/~fmec  You can also get a decent
idea of what the paddles look like there.

The photos of the Bratcha IV give a decent view of the blade shape and
an inkling of how the blade is offset from the shaft - on the wing
paddles
page of http://www.venturesport.com or http://tinyurl.com/dwcp

There's an okay picture of the front side of the blade on the paper that
Nick referenced:
http://www.isbs98.uni-konstanz.de/fullpaper/FullRossSanders.pdf

There are pictures of the back of the blade at
http://www.oceanpaddlesports.com/paddles.html

I wasn't able to locate a picture of an end on view of a wing paddle.  If
you still want an end on picture let me know.

Kirk
-- 
  Kirk Olsen
  kork4_at_cluemail.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:04:59 -0400
On 9 Jun 2003 at 20:42, Kirk Olsen wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 16:12:16 -0500, "Gordon Snapp"
> <grsnapp_at_charter.net> said:

> > But I have to admit, I don't think I know exactly what a wing paddle
> > is. Could someone give a definition?  Thanks!
> 
> A wing or propeller paddle is shaped more like an airplane propeller.
> The top of the blade is curved back and the blade itself is cupped and
> has a twist in it.  The blade is also offset from shaft of the paddle.

Most wing paddles look like the ones in the pictures Kirk referred 
you to, however, there are a few around that are not twisted.  If I 
understand it correctly, the original designs were not twisted and 
the twist was added later.  IIRC, one is referred to as Swedish and 
the other Norwegian, but I don't remember which is which.

There's also one that looks significantly different than this and is 
not common in racing - the  Schleicher from Nimbus paddles.
It's not a thin, hollowed blade, but a thicker blade.  The photo at
http://www.nimbuspaddles.com/graphite.html
doesn't capture the shape - you have to see it; odd looking beast.  
I've played with one in the shop, but never on the water.  It 
supposedly has better handling for sculling and bracing.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Dave Kruger <kdruger_at_pacifier.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 20:43:17 -0700
Kirk Olsen" <kork4_at_cluemail.com> wrote:

>>A wing or propeller paddle is shaped more like an airplane propeller.
The top of the blade is curved back and the blade itself is cupped and
has a twist in it.  The blade is also offset from shaft of the paddle.

There are some good movies of olympic paddlers using wing paddles on Fred
Mechini's page http://pluto.njcc.com/~fmec  You can also get a decent
idea of what the paddles look like there. >>

Thanks for posting this URL, Kirk.  I have handled wing paddles in shops, and
done some air-stroking with them, but seeing a world-class paddler use one is
a revelation.  Well, actually a couple of revelations:

1. Until I get my muscle mass and leanness to where they are, I bet my
stroking with a wing would be pretty pitiful.

2. It seems plain to me they are using a lot more intentional paddle-slide to
the outside in the last half of the stroke than I do -- I assume this
exploits the airfoil character of the paddle shape.  And, with that image
firmly in my brain, I can believe Nick's data (repeated below my sig; thanks,
Nick!) on the greater efficiency of the wing over a conventional Euro paddle.

Now I want to see some movies of world-class users of Greenland sticks!
Anybody got some?  Or, a URL?

--
Dave Kruger
Astoria, OR
--

>From Nick Schade:

>> There is some good data about the relative efficiency. The wing paddle
is apparently about 89% efficient and the "conventional" paddle blade
is about 74% efficient. What is still an open question is why the wind
paddle is more efficient.
http://www.isbs98.uni-konstanz.de/fullpaper/FullRossSanders.pdf What
this means is that even with an efficient wing blade, 11% of all the
energy applied to the paddle goes to do things other than pushing the
boat forward. >>

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Gabriel Romeu <romeug_at_erols.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:43:22 -0400
> 
> Now I want to see some movies of world-class users of Greenland sticks!
> Anybody got some?  Or, a URL?

this is good Dave-
http://www.qajaqusa.org/Movies/movies.html
> 

-- 
http://studiofurniture.com  §  http://journalphoto.org
http://kayakoutfitting.org  §   http://furnituresociety.org
gabriel romeu

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <michaeldaly_at_rogers.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:04:59 -0400
On 9 Jun 2003 at 20:43, Dave Kruger wrote:

> Now I want to see some movies of world-class users of Greenland
> sticks! Anybody got some?  Or, a URL?

http://www.qajaqusa.org/Movies/movies.html

The QajaqUSA web site should be your first source for Greenland info.
What's not on the site is probably on their links page.

Mike

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Kevin50110_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Duh, what is a wing paddle?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:17:11 EDT
Glad to see the Inuit technique response. So what is a wing paddle. Simply a 
design the Polar folk discarded 2000+ - years ago. 

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] wing theory
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 19:17:44 -0400
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 12:09  PM, Dave Kruger wrote:

> Nick Schade <nick_at_guillemot-kayaks.com> wrote:
>
>>> Work is defined as a change in energy. If you measure the work done 
>>> by
> your hand and you have all the parameters of your paddle matched such
> that they multiply together right it is absolutely possible to make the
> work done by your hand match with substantially different paddles. But
> remember that the work done by your hand is not the same thing as the
> work done on your boat. >>
>
> Nick, a small correction:  Classically, work is defined as the force 
> applied
> multiplied by the distance through which the force is applied ( W = f 
> x d),
> not a change in energy.  The change in energy in the paddler arm/back 
> system
> is not all directed at accomplishing work.  Some goes into generating
> turbulence in the water ("vortices") which ultimately ends up heating 
> up the
> water a bit.  (The water at the bottom of Niagara Falls is warmer by a 
> tiny
> fraction of a degree because of the "stirring" achieved by the fall and
> subsequent random mixing of the water.)

W=F x D is just one form for determining the work. In the most 
generalized form this can be expressed as Work = [delta] Energy. I've 
double checked this in my physics book.

All the change of energy of the paddler arm/back system does perform 
work, it is just that some of it doesn't do anything we really find 
useful. Work is done even when all you produce is heat.

>
> Consequently, if one is interested in determining efficiency in the
> paddler/boat/water system, he/she has to be careful to delineate what 
> is
> doing work on what.  The paddler does work on the paddle (pushing it
> rearward).  The paddle does work on the water (pushing it rearward).  
> And, in
> turn, the paddler's body does work on the boat, pushing it forward.  
> How much
> work gets done on the boat, from all the thrashing of the paddle, is 
> the key.

I agree. Often the problem when trying to analyze paddling efficiency 
people is choosing an appropriate frame of reference.

>
> I believe the original thesis was whether "wing" paddles were more 
> efficient
> than traditional Euro paddles (ones with an oval-shaped  blade on the 
> end of
> a shaft).  Whether a low pressure area is created behind the paddle as 
> it
> slices through the water may be moot if other features of paddle 
> passage
> through water are less efficient.

The original thesis as I understood it included the idea that a paddle 
could be 100% efficient. My goal has been to disabuse that notion.
>
> I think, to advance the cause, we need __data__ to sort out what's 
> going on
> in this system.  It is too complex to discuss piecemeal or to solve by
> gedanken analysis.  Albeit, it has been fun to scan what you guys have 
> been
> writing.

There is some good data about the relative efficiency. The wing paddle 
is apparently about 89% efficient and the "conventional" paddle blade 
is about 74% efficient. What is still an open question is why the wind 
paddle is more efficient. 
http://www.isbs98.uni-konstanz.de/fullpaper/FullRossSanders.pdf What 
this means is that even with an efficient wing blade, 11% of all the 
energy applied to the paddle goes to do things other than pushing the 
boat forward.

Nick Schade

Guillemot Kayaks
824 Thompson St
Glastonbury, CT 06033
USA
Ph/Fx: (860) 659-8847
http://www.guillemot-kayaks.com/

***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Bob Myers <bob_at_intelenet.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] 19ft Sea Lion Skeptics
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 11:32:47 -0700
Sorry Rich, but just because we were skeptical doesn't mean we think you 
were lying.

Sorry you got that impression, but really that's not what I for one was 
thinking - and as it turns out, we *were* right - it's not a Sea Lion, 
but a new boat modified from a Sea Lion - and since you asked about 
reviews of the boat originally, this is relevant because with a hull 
modified this much, I wouldn't think any reviews of the stock boat would 
have much relevance.


Richard wrote:

> I just have one last question reguarding all you Sea Lion Skeptics. . 
> . If I were going to make up something to tell the Paddlewise 
> community, why in the hell would I not have come up with something 
> much more interesting to lie about?  I promise you, if I ever try to 
> "yank your chain" it will be about my  circumnavigation of Greenland, 
> or  my solo crossing of the Pacific. . .  not about the existance of 
> an old $150.00 boat, that isn't even mine.
>
> Thx  Rich.
>
> P.S.  Just so you know , the mystery is solved.  I haven't inspected 
> it myself, but my friend tells me that there are two seems across the 
> width of the boat just fore and aft of the seat indicating a home made 
> stretch job.  So yes, the 19ft Sea Lion does exist, and no it wasn't 
> factory.
>
>


***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:34 PDT