PaddleWise by thread

From: Paul Montgomery <paul_at_paddleandoar.com>
subject: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:25:09 -0800
cnn.com has a little blurb on kayaks today:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/10/11/popsci.kayak/index.html

Paul Montgomery
paul_at_paddleandoar.com
http://paddleandoar.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:42:10 EST
In a message dated 12/6/2006 5:36:47 PM Pacific Standard Time,  
paul_at_paddleandoar.com writes:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/10/11/popsci.kayak/index.html



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
But they got this part right:
 
"That was then. Now I paddle sea kayaks. For a long time I thought kayaks  
were the purview of men and women who were probably also bird-watchers or  
nudists -- unsmiling folk who take the outdoors seriously. "
 
Cheers,
 
Rob G
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Kirk Olsen <kork4_at_cluemail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:15:40 -0500
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:42:10 EST, Rcgibbert_at_aol.com said:
> In a message dated 12/6/2006 5:36:47 PM Pacific Standard Time,  
> paul_at_paddleandoar.com writes:
> 
> http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/10/11/popsci.kayak/index.html
>
> But they got this part right:
>  
> "That was then. Now I paddle sea kayaks. For a long time I thought kayaks 
> were the purview of men and women who were probably also bird-watchers or 
> nudists -- unsmiling folk who take the outdoors seriously. "

As an avid splinter paddler (see CNN article).  He missed my current
preference, a self bailing splinter (aka surfski).  There's an
entertaining writeup on a surfski race by a sea kayaker (he comments on
the difference between the usual laid back sea kayakers and surfski
crowd) on:

http://www.surfski.info/content/view/323/89

-- 
  Kirk Olsen
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jackie Myers <jackie_at_muddypuppies.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 10:02:22 -0800
Kirk Olsen wrote:

>There's an
>entertaining writeup on a surfski race by a sea kayaker (he comments on
>the difference between the usual laid back sea kayakers and surfski
>crowd) on:
>
>http://www.surfski.info/content/view/323/89
>


Thanks for the link.  Very funny stuff. 

 From the report:

"Some twit (in a surfski) can't steer his boat at the start and almost 
takes me out. I hit him with my paddle and he disappears too. Posing 
time was over and the blondes were looking for new friends."
.....

"The first boat to go over is a Surfski driven by a blonde. I try to 
surf into her but I miss. At least it would have cheered me up."
......

"Will I take part again. Yes. Many thanks to the Surfski Fraternity for 
having us. The guys have got something. Regretfully I think it could be 
infectious."


That's what I would be afraid of.  Another costly habit.

Kirk, is your designer car color-coded with the "ski"?

Jackie
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Jim Farrelly <JFarrelly5_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:37:55 -0500
Jackie Myers wrote:

Thanks for the link. Very funny stuff.

> 
>
>  
>
My favorite tid bit, "There was no question of actually racing anyone. 
It was just survive and finish the race." 

It reminds me of a quote from the New South Wales Kayak Club site. "It 
was a good paddle. Nobody died."

There are days I love to just float.   And then there are days I wish 
the swell was bigger. And perhaps faster. A lot faster. With blondes...

Jim et al
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] there goes our sport!
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:36:24 -0500
On 12/6/06, Rcgibbert_at_aol.com <Rcgibbert_at_aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> But they got this part right:
>
> "That was then. Now I paddle sea kayaks. For a long time I thought kayaks
> were the purview of men and women who were probably also bird-watchers or
> nudists -- unsmiling folk who take the outdoors seriously. "
>
> One thing he didn't quite get right though. He mentioned the efficiency of
kayaks and bicycles but didn't mention (or didn't know) that a full 747 is
the most efficient machine in terms of BTUs burned per passenger moved. At
least according to a Scientific American issue of some years back.

The bicycle comes second but not by very much. I don't recall if the rider
had to be especially skilled or not but the gap between the bicycle and
whatever came in third was pretty big. Of course, in terms of
simplicity-per-passenger-mile I think he'd be right; a kayak has to be right
up there.

I'm pretty sure that kayaks weren't in that article but it would sure be
interesting to find out just where they would fit in this equation. Sounds
like something that Matt Broze would either know or be able to discover.


Craig Jungers
Royal City, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Robert Livingston <bearboat2_at_comcast.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:51:59 -0800
I am surprised it is not a converted oil tanker filled to the brim  
with tens of thousands of people moving leisurely through the water.

I remember an argument that a ship filled with CD's had the greatest  
bandwidth of any "system".



On Dec 8, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Craig Jungers wrote:

> that a full 747 is
> the most efficient machine in terms of BTUs burned per passenger  
> moved.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:27:49 -0800
On 12/9/06, Robert Livingston <bearboat2_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>
> I am surprised it is not a converted oil tanker filled to the brim
> with tens of thousands of people moving leisurely through the water.


Scientific American tends to make better comparisons than the purely
hypothetical, I think. Besides, I spent some considerable time on tankers
(Sun, Exxon and Chevron) and I don't think that they'd be very efficient
even if the tanks were filled to the brim with people stacked up like
cordwood.


> I remember an argument that a ship filled with CD's had the greatest
> bandwidth of any "system".


I've heard this argument and think that the proponents tend to ignore
"speed". That ship might move a lot of data but it wouldn't be very quick.
On an electrical network all packets move at the speed of light so,
technically, even your old 28kbps dial-up modem is as fast as the fastest
optical fiber system. It has the speed; it just doesn't have the bandwidth.

Alaska's Senator Stevens was widely laughed at when he said that the
Internet is a series of "tubes" but network engineers often use the term
"pipe" when they talk about bandwidth. Stevens, in what must surely be one
of the few times he was right (or almost right), probably heard someone
talking about getting a bigger "pipe" for a system and mis-remembered what
the term was. But networks, like water, work better if they have a wider
"pipe".

Our old trusty 747 can be used to illustrate this concept. If we compare two
jet planes; say the 747 and the 737, we know that they travel at pretty
similar speeds (about 500 mph). But the 747 carries more passengers so it
has a greater bandwidth. But a 737 is cheaper and if you only need to move
than bandwidth then it's the better bargain.


Craig Jungers
Royal City, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:09:58 -0500
Craig Jungers wrote:

> Scientific American tends to make better comparisons than the purely
> hypothetical, I think. Besides, I spent some considerable time on tankers
> (Sun, Exxon and Chevron) and I don't think that they'd be very efficient
> even if the tanks were filled to the brim with people stacked up like
> cordwood.

An old article in SA back in the '70s showed the relative efficiency of various 
means of transportation.  Rather than show the efficiency in terms of numbers of 
people, they showed the efficiency in terms of energy used per kilogram moved 
per kilometer traveled.  In those terms, the 747 was a relatively poor means of 
travel (lifting 750,000lb up 31,000 feet at the start doesn't contribute to 
efficiency).  The bicycle was number two on land (first was a unit train like 
those mile-long ore carriers).  Number one overall was a supertanker filled to 
the brim with oil.


The problem is of course that people are relatively light and demand a lot of 
room - that makes for bulk rather than efficiency.  This in spite of the fact 
that so many people appear to be so dense. :-)

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:00:52 +1100
G'day,

Did these articles include the cyclist's basal metabolic rate or were they
using only the energy consumed in exercise which would have been the more
valid comparison.

In comparing air transport its very important to state whether its a long
or short haul flight. 

The embodied eenrgy of the machine and the fuel also needs to be included
for each mode of transport.

I'd be very suprised given these parameters if kayaking with a high angle
racing stroke on a steady diet of baked beans didn't turn out to be the most
efficient form of transport there is and should be mandated by law for all
citizens travelling anywhere.

All the best, PeterO
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:22:36 -0500
rebyl_kayak_at_iprimus.com.au wrote:

> Did these articles include the cyclist's basal metabolic rate or were they
> using only the energy consumed in exercise which would have been the more
> valid comparison.

I can only comment on the older article I mentioned - it was consumed energy only.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Matt Broze <mkayaks_at_oz.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:48:16 -0800
If we limit this to locomotion for a single individual I think you would
find the bicycle way more efficient than the kayak given a level playing
field anyhow. And I do mean smooth level ground for the bicycle and calm
water for the kayak. The variable would be the drag at any given speed and
the efficiency of the transmission of the persons energy into motion. The
kayak mushing through the water would have lots more friction and the
mushiness of the water also effects the efficient transmission of the
paddlers energy. Thinking about that for awhile I might put my money on ice
skating. Of course, if you count the energy needed to freeze the ice on a
path from Seattle to NYC into the equation the bet is off.

I'm guessing the 747's efficiency was based on calculations just for level
flight in the thin air at somewhere around 35,000 feet and didn't count the
takeoff and climbing expenditures of energy. The bike calculations were
probably not for a fully faired multi-passenger record breaking model
either.

Matt Broze
www.marinerkayaks.com
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:40:55 -0500
Matt Broze wrote:

> Thinking about that for awhile I might put my money on ice
> skating. 

I've done about 17 kph on speedskates (without specific training) sustained over 
two hours (Calgary's Olympic oval - one of the fastest tracks in the world) and 
just over 20 kph on inline skates in races of about 1/2 hour (city roads - I 
don't remember my speed on a marathon course).  With training, I think that the 
ice skating would be somewhat faster (crossover strokes with those long blades 
take practice - and that's the only way to get speed in the turns).  Comparable 
energy output on a racing bike (not mountain) would be comfortably over 30 kph. 
  Cross-country skiing (classic, not free technique) would be about 12-14 kph. 
I'm obviously not fast compared to the pros.

Speed doesn't factor directly into energy/kg/km so the above doesn't tell much. 
  However, I know the bike is more efficient than XC skiing and I'd guess that 
it is also more efficient than skating - but not by a lot.

Horses can run more efficiently than people can walk - hence if you could get a 
horse on a bike, that would set the land energy record.  Back in the 19th 
century, someone tried this - a four wheel wagon with four pedals.  They gave up 
trying to teach the horse to use the correct motion before getting useful results.

Now a horse in a kayak...

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michel Charlebois <michelcharlebois_at_videotron.ca>
subject: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:59:01 -0500
If you calculate the energy necessary to construct the road a bicycle need
to roll on, a kayak could be more efficient.

Think of the first discoverers and settlers that came to populate North
America. They where able to cross the continent relying almost only on their
own effort. If they had to construct pathway for their bicycle they could
still be at it. 

Michel Charlebois


Le 06/12/12 07:48, + Matt Broze ; <mkayaks_at_oz.net> a icrit :

> If we limit this to locomotion for a single individual I think you would
> find the bicycle way more efficient than the kayak given a level playing
> field anyhow. 
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 12:05:15 -0500
Michel Charlebois wrote:

> Think of the first discoverers and settlers that came to populate North
> America. They where able to cross the continent relying almost only on their
> own effort. If they had to construct pathway for their bicycle they could
> still be at it. 

Those who crossed North America by canoe did construct their own pathways. 
There are still remnants of the original portage paths in many parts of Canada. 
  This past summer I had the great fortune to go paddling for a day with a local 
professor of botany who specializes in trees and forests.  We paddled over to 
examine a prairie - on examining it, he declared that it was most likely the 
result of many generations of prescribed burns by the local First Nations (it 
was on a local reserve).  He then told me that many of the other prairie areas 
here in Ontario (where boreal forest is the norm) are the result of a history of 
prescribed burns and that these prairies were used as portage routes.

It is a lot easier to burn off a part of a forest and let a prairie grow than to 
cut a swath through a forest and maintain a road.  The network of such prairie 
patches form a canoe pathway from the St. Laurence/Ottawa river valleys through 
the Great Lakes and on to the west past Lake Superior.

These routes were the highways of the past and were manmade.  The first 
Europeans who explored North America followed the routes already constructed by 
the First Nations.  If you look at the experiences of the fur traders, explorers 
  like Mackenzie or Lewis and Clark, they all relied on First Nations guides and 
knowledge of exiting routes.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Joseph Pylka <jpylka_at_earthlink.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:29:57 -0500
-- Now that's really interesting...   I wonder if it's possible to use
satellite imagery to locate historical portages and hence canoe routes
through that region.  I'll have to give it a try on earth.google if they
have good coverage of the area....
	Also, I'm particularly interested for another reason;   habitat for
grassland nesting birds.  Other than prairies, grasslands are the
fastest-disappearing habitat in the east.  NJ has only 3% of it still in
existence and what's left is in jeopardy.  Canada is still a major bulwark
for many neotropical species and I gather that grasslands are in short
supply in that area as well...

Joe Pylka

> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
>
> These routes were the highways of the past and were manmade.  The first 
> Europeans who explored North America followed the routes already
constructed by 
> the First Nations.  If you look at the experiences of the fur traders,
explorers 
>   like Mackenzie or Lewis and Clark, they all relied on First Nations
guides and 
> knowledge of exiting routes.
>
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Michael Daly <mikedaly_at_magma.ca>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 15:40:56 -0500
Joseph Pylka wrote:

> -- Now that's really interesting...   I wonder if it's possible to use
> satellite imagery to locate historical portages and hence canoe routes
> through that region.  I'll have to give it a try on earth.google if they
> have good coverage of the area....

I can't help you there with specifics.  However, there is a prairie remnant that 
connects Lake Simcoe to Georgian Bay in Ontario and was used as a trade route by 
early First Nations.  You should see that.  I don't know if you could tell the 
difference between a "natural" prairie (in the sense of being long established 
even though originally manmade) like this compared to farm land.  I studied a 
teensy bit of air photo interpretation about 34 years ago but not enough to say. 
  I suppose the prairie would lack linear features (fences, drainage trenches etc.)

I know that some of the significant fur trade routes followed the big rivers in 
the east.  From Montreal, they went up the Ottawa River to the Mattawa River, 
thence west to Lake Nipissing.  From there, the French River to Georgian Bay and 
then along the North Shore route to Sault Ste. Marie and then Lake Superior. 
Most of these portage trails are relatively short.  Many of these locations are 
good for sea kayaking or WW canoe and kayaking depending on your tastes.  I've 
done different bits in all three craft and ... wow, what can I say - some of the 
best places in the world to paddle.

The prairie type trails were used in places like Bruce Peninsula to allow them 
to take a shortcut across the peninsula from Georgian Bay to Lake Huron and 
thence to Michigan.  That portage trail is marked with a historical plaque on 
Hwy 6 that runs up the peninsula.  I think (can't remember exactly) that the 
eastern terminus is in the Lion's Head area where the peninsula is narrow - 
don't quote me.

Back in 1967, a group of paddlers used big North canoes to cross Canada 
following the old canoe routes as a Centennial project - they ended at Expo 67 
in Montreal.  This has been repeated several times since, so those routes are 
known and may be documented on the web.  Canadians see the canoe as integral to 
their cultural history; I don't think you'll find similar levels of knowledge of 
ancient canoe routes in the US.  OTOH, other routes, such as the wagon trains 
are well documented, of course.

Mike
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: James <jimtibensky_at_fastmail.fm>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:44:48 -0600
Mike said: 

Back in 1967, a group of paddlers used big North canoes to cross Canada
following the old canoe routes as a Centennial project - they ended at
Expo 67 in Montreal.  This has been repeated several times since, so
those routes
are known and may be documented on the web. 



I was one of the paddlers on that 1967 trip.  We wore voyageur outfits,
slept under the canoes and generally tried to live a voyageur life while
we paddled.  We carried no furs other than a pet raccon which we managed
to hand off to the Montreal Zoo. Unfortunately, I was too young to drink
like a voyageur, so the high wine went to other, older, guys.

We had three canoes, one of which was a birchbark North canoe.  It now
resides, as far as I know, in the Northwest Fur Company museum in
Williamstown, Ontario.  We 'officially' ended the trip at Expo 67, even
carrying the canoes up into the Ontario pavillion.  But the real end was
Williamstown where we carried the birchbark, which we called "Reluctant
Rosie" because it was not the easiest thing to paddle, into the museum,
never to touch the water again.  It was made by First Nations people
with the understanding that it would be put in a museum but, it seems,
no one told them it was going to be paddled to the museum.  It leaked,
it had a permanent left turn and it weighed a ton after soaking up a lot
of water.  But we had fun.  The other two canoes were fibreglas, one was
a North and the other was a 35 foot Canot du Maitre made by Ralph Frese,
who also captained it.  Hugh McMillan was one of the organizers of, and
a paddler on, the trip.  He authored a book called Adventures of a Paper
Sleuth which tells of his historical research.

Memories. . .


Jim Tibensky

Our longest portage, to get back to the original topic, was nine miles!
(Canada was still on the English system of measurement in those days.) 
So not all the Voyageur Highway portages are easy.
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Craig Jungers <crjungers_at_gmail.com>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 11:03:45 -0500
On 12/14/06, James <jimtibensky_at_fastmail.fm> wrote:

"It was made by First Nations people with the understanding that it would be
put in a museum but, it seems,
no one told them it was going to be paddled to the museum."

That's a great line. It helped me imagine your frustrations with that boat
all those years ago. Thanks for my first laugh of the morning. :)


Craig Jungers
Royal City, WA
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: <cholst_at_bitstream.net>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] Re : BTU per passenger moved
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:22:42 -0600 (CST)
  Jim Tibensky:

> Our longest portage, to get back to the original topic, was nine miles!
> (Canada was still on the English system of measurement in those days.)
> So not all the Voyageur Highway portages are easy.

Nine miles is the length of the Grand Portage trail from the fur trading
post at Grand Portage, Minnesota, to the Pigeon River. I skied it once
many years ago, but I have never hiked or portaged it.

I think all the portages in Minnesota are at least documented, if not
widely known. Those on the border between Minnesota and Ontario are
mostly, if not entirely, still in use, as they are part of the Boundary
Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota and Quetico Provincial Park in
Ontario. I have myself carried a canoe over many of them.

Such was the importance in the 19th century of the waterway along the
border that the Webster-Ashburton treaty, which confirmed the border in
its present location, specifically granted to the citizens of Canada and
the USA the right to use the customary portages along the border
regardless of which side of the border the portages happened to be.

(The Treaty of Paris in 1783 established the border along the primary fur
trade route west of Lake Superior. On that basis, some Canadians tried to
claim all of Minnesota north of the St. Louis River, which is just south
of Duluth. The Americans counterclaimed that the Kaministikwia River just
southwest of Thunder Bay was the true border. Hence the need for the
Webster-Ashburton treaty of the mid-1800s.)

Chuck Holst
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************
From: Tord Eriksson <tord_at_tord.nu>
subject: Re: [Paddlewise] BTU per passenger moved
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:46:25 +0100
On Thursday 14 December 2006 17:06, Craig wrote:

> "It was made by First Nations people with the understanding that it
> would be put in a museum but, it seems,
> no one told them it was going to be paddled to the museum."
>
> That's a great line. It helped me imagine your frustrations with that
> boat all those years ago. Thanks for my first laugh of the morning. :)

Agree fully with Craig! 

Tord

PS Once I owned a kayak that seems to have been
related to that canoe, as it preferred turning to port  ...
***************************************************************************
PaddleWise Paddling Mailing List - Any opinions or suggestions expressed
here are solely those of the writer(s). You must assume the entire
responsibility for reliance upon them. All postings copyright the author.
Submissions:     PaddleWise_at_PaddleWise.net
Subscriptions:   PaddleWise-request_at_PaddleWise.net
Website:         http://www.paddlewise.net/
***************************************************************************

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Aug 21 2025 - 16:33:43 PDT